Cargando…

A Systematic Review and Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis of fMRI Studies on Sweet Taste in Humans

BACKGROUND: The reward value of palatable foods is often cited as an important influence on eating behaviors, including intake of sugars. However, human neuroimaging studies have generated conflicting evidence on the basic neural representation of taste and reward responses to caloric sweeteners (su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Carl A, Giesbrecht, Timo, Fallon, Nicholas, Thomas, Anna, Mela, David J, Kirkham, Tim C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7269728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32271923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxaa071
_version_ 1783541809437212672
author Roberts, Carl A
Giesbrecht, Timo
Fallon, Nicholas
Thomas, Anna
Mela, David J
Kirkham, Tim C
author_facet Roberts, Carl A
Giesbrecht, Timo
Fallon, Nicholas
Thomas, Anna
Mela, David J
Kirkham, Tim C
author_sort Roberts, Carl A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The reward value of palatable foods is often cited as an important influence on eating behaviors, including intake of sugars. However, human neuroimaging studies have generated conflicting evidence on the basic neural representation of taste and reward responses to caloric sweeteners (sucrose and glucose), and most relevant studies have used small subject numbers. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review and a coordinate-based meta-analysis of studies reporting brain responses to oral sugar solutions. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and PsycINFO through October 2019 identified fMRI studies (in healthy human adults, including those with overweight or obesity) assessing differences in responses to purified sweet and nonsweet taste stimuli. Data were extracted with the primary objective of quantifying evidence for the activation of brain regions associated with caloric sweet taste sensation. We used activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis methods. We also performed multiple sensitivity analyses to assess the generality of effects. RESULTS: Of 455 unique articles, 15 met the criteria for inclusion. These contributed to 2 primary meta-analyses: 1) sucrose (13 experiments, 179 coordinates, n = 241) and 2) sucrose + glucose (16 experiments, 209 coordinates, n = 262). Consistent activation was apparent in primary taste areas: insula (69.2% of studies) and opercular cortex (76.9% of studies), precentral gyri (53.9% of studies), and globus pallidus and postcentral gyrus (30.8% of studies for each). Evidence of reward activity (caudate) was seen in the primary analyses (30.8% of studies) but not in sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the importance of primary taste areas for gustatory processing in human adults. We also provide tentative evidence for reward-related caudate activity in relation to the sweet taste of caloric sugars. A number of factors affect the observation and interpretation of brain responses, including reward-related activity. Firm conclusions require confirmation with large data set studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7269728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72697282020-06-09 A Systematic Review and Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis of fMRI Studies on Sweet Taste in Humans Roberts, Carl A Giesbrecht, Timo Fallon, Nicholas Thomas, Anna Mela, David J Kirkham, Tim C J Nutr Ingestive Behavior and Neurosciences BACKGROUND: The reward value of palatable foods is often cited as an important influence on eating behaviors, including intake of sugars. However, human neuroimaging studies have generated conflicting evidence on the basic neural representation of taste and reward responses to caloric sweeteners (sucrose and glucose), and most relevant studies have used small subject numbers. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review and a coordinate-based meta-analysis of studies reporting brain responses to oral sugar solutions. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and PsycINFO through October 2019 identified fMRI studies (in healthy human adults, including those with overweight or obesity) assessing differences in responses to purified sweet and nonsweet taste stimuli. Data were extracted with the primary objective of quantifying evidence for the activation of brain regions associated with caloric sweet taste sensation. We used activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis methods. We also performed multiple sensitivity analyses to assess the generality of effects. RESULTS: Of 455 unique articles, 15 met the criteria for inclusion. These contributed to 2 primary meta-analyses: 1) sucrose (13 experiments, 179 coordinates, n = 241) and 2) sucrose + glucose (16 experiments, 209 coordinates, n = 262). Consistent activation was apparent in primary taste areas: insula (69.2% of studies) and opercular cortex (76.9% of studies), precentral gyri (53.9% of studies), and globus pallidus and postcentral gyrus (30.8% of studies for each). Evidence of reward activity (caudate) was seen in the primary analyses (30.8% of studies) but not in sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the importance of primary taste areas for gustatory processing in human adults. We also provide tentative evidence for reward-related caudate activity in relation to the sweet taste of caloric sugars. A number of factors affect the observation and interpretation of brain responses, including reward-related activity. Firm conclusions require confirmation with large data set studies. Oxford University Press 2020-06 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7269728/ /pubmed/32271923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxaa071 Text en Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ingestive Behavior and Neurosciences
Roberts, Carl A
Giesbrecht, Timo
Fallon, Nicholas
Thomas, Anna
Mela, David J
Kirkham, Tim C
A Systematic Review and Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis of fMRI Studies on Sweet Taste in Humans
title A Systematic Review and Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis of fMRI Studies on Sweet Taste in Humans
title_full A Systematic Review and Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis of fMRI Studies on Sweet Taste in Humans
title_fullStr A Systematic Review and Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis of fMRI Studies on Sweet Taste in Humans
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review and Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis of fMRI Studies on Sweet Taste in Humans
title_short A Systematic Review and Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis of fMRI Studies on Sweet Taste in Humans
title_sort systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of fmri studies on sweet taste in humans
topic Ingestive Behavior and Neurosciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7269728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32271923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxaa071
work_keys_str_mv AT robertscarla asystematicreviewandactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisoffmristudiesonsweettasteinhumans
AT giesbrechttimo asystematicreviewandactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisoffmristudiesonsweettasteinhumans
AT fallonnicholas asystematicreviewandactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisoffmristudiesonsweettasteinhumans
AT thomasanna asystematicreviewandactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisoffmristudiesonsweettasteinhumans
AT meladavidj asystematicreviewandactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisoffmristudiesonsweettasteinhumans
AT kirkhamtimc asystematicreviewandactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisoffmristudiesonsweettasteinhumans
AT robertscarla systematicreviewandactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisoffmristudiesonsweettasteinhumans
AT giesbrechttimo systematicreviewandactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisoffmristudiesonsweettasteinhumans
AT fallonnicholas systematicreviewandactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisoffmristudiesonsweettasteinhumans
AT thomasanna systematicreviewandactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisoffmristudiesonsweettasteinhumans
AT meladavidj systematicreviewandactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisoffmristudiesonsweettasteinhumans
AT kirkhamtimc systematicreviewandactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisoffmristudiesonsweettasteinhumans