Cargando…

What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music?

BACKGROUND: This study concerns the perception of musical segmentation during listening to live contemporary classical music. Little is known about how listeners form judgments of musical segments, particularly when typical section markers, such as cadences and fermatas, are absent [e.g., Sears et a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Michelle, Stewart, Andrew J., Wilcoxson, J. Matthew, Jones, Luke A., Howard, Emily, Willcox, Pip, du Sautoy, Marcus, De Roure, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7270279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01001
_version_ 1783541879564926976
author Phillips, Michelle
Stewart, Andrew J.
Wilcoxson, J. Matthew
Jones, Luke A.
Howard, Emily
Willcox, Pip
du Sautoy, Marcus
De Roure, David
author_facet Phillips, Michelle
Stewart, Andrew J.
Wilcoxson, J. Matthew
Jones, Luke A.
Howard, Emily
Willcox, Pip
du Sautoy, Marcus
De Roure, David
author_sort Phillips, Michelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study concerns the perception of musical segmentation during listening to live contemporary classical music. Little is known about how listeners form judgments of musical segments, particularly when typical section markers, such as cadences and fermatas, are absent [e.g., Sears et al. (2014)] or when the music is non-tonal (e.g., in much contemporary classical music). AIMS: The current study aimed to examine the listeners’ segmentation decisions in a piece of contemporary music, Ligeti’s “Fanfares”? METHODS: Data were gathered using a smartphone application [Practice & Research in Science & Music (PRiSM) Perception App] designed for this study by the Royal Northern College of Music (RNCM) Centre for PRiSM and the Oxford e-Research Centre. A total of 259 audience participants were asked to “tap” when they felt that a section had ended. Subjective responses were captured, as well as contextual data about the participants. RESULTS: The audience members demonstrated high levels of agreement regarding segmentation, mostly at places in the music involving breaks in the musical texture (one piano hand resting), changes in dynamic (volume), and changes in register/pitch. A sense of familiarity with contemporary repertoire did seem to influence the responses—the participants who self-reported being familiar with contemporary music used a wider range of cues to make their segmentation decisions. The self-report data analysis suggested that the listeners were not always aware of how they made decisions regarding segmentation. The factors which may influence their judgment of musical segmentation are, to some extent, similar to those identified by music analysis (Steinitz, 2011) but different in other ways. The effect of musical training was found to be quite small. CONCLUSION: Whether musically trained and/or familiar with contemporary classical music or not, the listeners demonstrate commonalities in segmentation, which they are not always aware of. This study has implications for contemporary composers, performers, and audiences and how they engage with new music in particular.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7270279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72702792020-06-15 What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music? Phillips, Michelle Stewart, Andrew J. Wilcoxson, J. Matthew Jones, Luke A. Howard, Emily Willcox, Pip du Sautoy, Marcus De Roure, David Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND: This study concerns the perception of musical segmentation during listening to live contemporary classical music. Little is known about how listeners form judgments of musical segments, particularly when typical section markers, such as cadences and fermatas, are absent [e.g., Sears et al. (2014)] or when the music is non-tonal (e.g., in much contemporary classical music). AIMS: The current study aimed to examine the listeners’ segmentation decisions in a piece of contemporary music, Ligeti’s “Fanfares”? METHODS: Data were gathered using a smartphone application [Practice & Research in Science & Music (PRiSM) Perception App] designed for this study by the Royal Northern College of Music (RNCM) Centre for PRiSM and the Oxford e-Research Centre. A total of 259 audience participants were asked to “tap” when they felt that a section had ended. Subjective responses were captured, as well as contextual data about the participants. RESULTS: The audience members demonstrated high levels of agreement regarding segmentation, mostly at places in the music involving breaks in the musical texture (one piano hand resting), changes in dynamic (volume), and changes in register/pitch. A sense of familiarity with contemporary repertoire did seem to influence the responses—the participants who self-reported being familiar with contemporary music used a wider range of cues to make their segmentation decisions. The self-report data analysis suggested that the listeners were not always aware of how they made decisions regarding segmentation. The factors which may influence their judgment of musical segmentation are, to some extent, similar to those identified by music analysis (Steinitz, 2011) but different in other ways. The effect of musical training was found to be quite small. CONCLUSION: Whether musically trained and/or familiar with contemporary classical music or not, the listeners demonstrate commonalities in segmentation, which they are not always aware of. This study has implications for contemporary composers, performers, and audiences and how they engage with new music in particular. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7270279/ /pubmed/32547450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01001 Text en Copyright © 2020 Phillips, Stewart, Wilcoxson, Jones, Howard, Willcox, du Sautoy and De Roure. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Phillips, Michelle
Stewart, Andrew J.
Wilcoxson, J. Matthew
Jones, Luke A.
Howard, Emily
Willcox, Pip
du Sautoy, Marcus
De Roure, David
What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music?
title What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music?
title_full What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music?
title_fullStr What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music?
title_full_unstemmed What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music?
title_short What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music?
title_sort what determines the perception of segmentation in contemporary music?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7270279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01001
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsmichelle whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic
AT stewartandrewj whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic
AT wilcoxsonjmatthew whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic
AT joneslukea whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic
AT howardemily whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic
AT willcoxpip whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic
AT dusautoymarcus whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic
AT derouredavid whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic