Cargando…
What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music?
BACKGROUND: This study concerns the perception of musical segmentation during listening to live contemporary classical music. Little is known about how listeners form judgments of musical segments, particularly when typical section markers, such as cadences and fermatas, are absent [e.g., Sears et a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7270279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01001 |
_version_ | 1783541879564926976 |
---|---|
author | Phillips, Michelle Stewart, Andrew J. Wilcoxson, J. Matthew Jones, Luke A. Howard, Emily Willcox, Pip du Sautoy, Marcus De Roure, David |
author_facet | Phillips, Michelle Stewart, Andrew J. Wilcoxson, J. Matthew Jones, Luke A. Howard, Emily Willcox, Pip du Sautoy, Marcus De Roure, David |
author_sort | Phillips, Michelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study concerns the perception of musical segmentation during listening to live contemporary classical music. Little is known about how listeners form judgments of musical segments, particularly when typical section markers, such as cadences and fermatas, are absent [e.g., Sears et al. (2014)] or when the music is non-tonal (e.g., in much contemporary classical music). AIMS: The current study aimed to examine the listeners’ segmentation decisions in a piece of contemporary music, Ligeti’s “Fanfares”? METHODS: Data were gathered using a smartphone application [Practice & Research in Science & Music (PRiSM) Perception App] designed for this study by the Royal Northern College of Music (RNCM) Centre for PRiSM and the Oxford e-Research Centre. A total of 259 audience participants were asked to “tap” when they felt that a section had ended. Subjective responses were captured, as well as contextual data about the participants. RESULTS: The audience members demonstrated high levels of agreement regarding segmentation, mostly at places in the music involving breaks in the musical texture (one piano hand resting), changes in dynamic (volume), and changes in register/pitch. A sense of familiarity with contemporary repertoire did seem to influence the responses—the participants who self-reported being familiar with contemporary music used a wider range of cues to make their segmentation decisions. The self-report data analysis suggested that the listeners were not always aware of how they made decisions regarding segmentation. The factors which may influence their judgment of musical segmentation are, to some extent, similar to those identified by music analysis (Steinitz, 2011) but different in other ways. The effect of musical training was found to be quite small. CONCLUSION: Whether musically trained and/or familiar with contemporary classical music or not, the listeners demonstrate commonalities in segmentation, which they are not always aware of. This study has implications for contemporary composers, performers, and audiences and how they engage with new music in particular. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7270279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72702792020-06-15 What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music? Phillips, Michelle Stewart, Andrew J. Wilcoxson, J. Matthew Jones, Luke A. Howard, Emily Willcox, Pip du Sautoy, Marcus De Roure, David Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND: This study concerns the perception of musical segmentation during listening to live contemporary classical music. Little is known about how listeners form judgments of musical segments, particularly when typical section markers, such as cadences and fermatas, are absent [e.g., Sears et al. (2014)] or when the music is non-tonal (e.g., in much contemporary classical music). AIMS: The current study aimed to examine the listeners’ segmentation decisions in a piece of contemporary music, Ligeti’s “Fanfares”? METHODS: Data were gathered using a smartphone application [Practice & Research in Science & Music (PRiSM) Perception App] designed for this study by the Royal Northern College of Music (RNCM) Centre for PRiSM and the Oxford e-Research Centre. A total of 259 audience participants were asked to “tap” when they felt that a section had ended. Subjective responses were captured, as well as contextual data about the participants. RESULTS: The audience members demonstrated high levels of agreement regarding segmentation, mostly at places in the music involving breaks in the musical texture (one piano hand resting), changes in dynamic (volume), and changes in register/pitch. A sense of familiarity with contemporary repertoire did seem to influence the responses—the participants who self-reported being familiar with contemporary music used a wider range of cues to make their segmentation decisions. The self-report data analysis suggested that the listeners were not always aware of how they made decisions regarding segmentation. The factors which may influence their judgment of musical segmentation are, to some extent, similar to those identified by music analysis (Steinitz, 2011) but different in other ways. The effect of musical training was found to be quite small. CONCLUSION: Whether musically trained and/or familiar with contemporary classical music or not, the listeners demonstrate commonalities in segmentation, which they are not always aware of. This study has implications for contemporary composers, performers, and audiences and how they engage with new music in particular. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7270279/ /pubmed/32547450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01001 Text en Copyright © 2020 Phillips, Stewart, Wilcoxson, Jones, Howard, Willcox, du Sautoy and De Roure. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Phillips, Michelle Stewart, Andrew J. Wilcoxson, J. Matthew Jones, Luke A. Howard, Emily Willcox, Pip du Sautoy, Marcus De Roure, David What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music? |
title | What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music? |
title_full | What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music? |
title_fullStr | What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music? |
title_full_unstemmed | What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music? |
title_short | What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music? |
title_sort | what determines the perception of segmentation in contemporary music? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7270279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phillipsmichelle whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic AT stewartandrewj whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic AT wilcoxsonjmatthew whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic AT joneslukea whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic AT howardemily whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic AT willcoxpip whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic AT dusautoymarcus whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic AT derouredavid whatdeterminestheperceptionofsegmentationincontemporarymusic |