Cargando…

Erenumab in Chronic Migraine Patients Who Previously Failed Five First-Line Oral Prophylactics and OnabotulinumtoxinA: A Dual-Center Retrospective Observational Study

Background: German authorities reimburse migraine prevention with erenumab only in patients who previously did not have therapeutic success with at least five oral prophylactics or have contraindications to such. In this real-world analysis, we assessed treatment response to erenumab in patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raffaelli, Bianca, Kalantzis, Rea, Mecklenburg, Jasper, Overeem, Lucas Hendrik, Neeb, Lars, Gendolla, Astrid, Reuter, Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7270347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00417
_version_ 1783541888406519808
author Raffaelli, Bianca
Kalantzis, Rea
Mecklenburg, Jasper
Overeem, Lucas Hendrik
Neeb, Lars
Gendolla, Astrid
Reuter, Uwe
author_facet Raffaelli, Bianca
Kalantzis, Rea
Mecklenburg, Jasper
Overeem, Lucas Hendrik
Neeb, Lars
Gendolla, Astrid
Reuter, Uwe
author_sort Raffaelli, Bianca
collection PubMed
description Background: German authorities reimburse migraine prevention with erenumab only in patients who previously did not have therapeutic success with at least five oral prophylactics or have contraindications to such. In this real-world analysis, we assessed treatment response to erenumab in patients with chronic migraine (CM) who failed five oral prophylactics and, in addition, onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA). Methods: We analyzed retrospective data of 139 CM patients with at least one injection of erenumab from two German headache centers. Patients previously did not respond sufficiently or had contraindications to β-blockers, flunarizine, topiramate, amitriptyline, valproate, and BoNTA. Primary endpoint of this analysis was the mean change in monthly headache days from the 4-weeks baseline period over the course of a 12-weeks erenumab therapy. Secondary endpoints were changes in monthly migraine days, days with severe headache, days with acute headache medication, and triptan intake in the treatment period. Results: Erenumab (starting dose 70 mg) led to a reduction of −3.7 (95% CI 2.4–5.1) monthly headache days after the first treatment and −4.7 (95% CI 2.9–6.5) after three treatment cycles (p < 0.001 for both). All secondary endpoint parameters were reduced over time. Half of patients (51.11%) had a >30% reduction of monthly headache days in weeks 9–12. Only 4.3% of the patients terminated erenumab treatment due to side effects. Conclusion: In this treatment-refractory CM population, erenumab showed efficacy in a real-world setting similar to data from clinical trials. Tolerability was good, and no safety issues emerged. Erenumabis is a treatment option for CM patients who failed all first-line preventives in addition to BoNTA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7270347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72703472020-06-15 Erenumab in Chronic Migraine Patients Who Previously Failed Five First-Line Oral Prophylactics and OnabotulinumtoxinA: A Dual-Center Retrospective Observational Study Raffaelli, Bianca Kalantzis, Rea Mecklenburg, Jasper Overeem, Lucas Hendrik Neeb, Lars Gendolla, Astrid Reuter, Uwe Front Neurol Neurology Background: German authorities reimburse migraine prevention with erenumab only in patients who previously did not have therapeutic success with at least five oral prophylactics or have contraindications to such. In this real-world analysis, we assessed treatment response to erenumab in patients with chronic migraine (CM) who failed five oral prophylactics and, in addition, onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA). Methods: We analyzed retrospective data of 139 CM patients with at least one injection of erenumab from two German headache centers. Patients previously did not respond sufficiently or had contraindications to β-blockers, flunarizine, topiramate, amitriptyline, valproate, and BoNTA. Primary endpoint of this analysis was the mean change in monthly headache days from the 4-weeks baseline period over the course of a 12-weeks erenumab therapy. Secondary endpoints were changes in monthly migraine days, days with severe headache, days with acute headache medication, and triptan intake in the treatment period. Results: Erenumab (starting dose 70 mg) led to a reduction of −3.7 (95% CI 2.4–5.1) monthly headache days after the first treatment and −4.7 (95% CI 2.9–6.5) after three treatment cycles (p < 0.001 for both). All secondary endpoint parameters were reduced over time. Half of patients (51.11%) had a >30% reduction of monthly headache days in weeks 9–12. Only 4.3% of the patients terminated erenumab treatment due to side effects. Conclusion: In this treatment-refractory CM population, erenumab showed efficacy in a real-world setting similar to data from clinical trials. Tolerability was good, and no safety issues emerged. Erenumabis is a treatment option for CM patients who failed all first-line preventives in addition to BoNTA. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7270347/ /pubmed/32547474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00417 Text en Copyright © 2020 Raffaelli, Kalantzis, Mecklenburg, Overeem, Neeb, Gendolla and Reuter. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Raffaelli, Bianca
Kalantzis, Rea
Mecklenburg, Jasper
Overeem, Lucas Hendrik
Neeb, Lars
Gendolla, Astrid
Reuter, Uwe
Erenumab in Chronic Migraine Patients Who Previously Failed Five First-Line Oral Prophylactics and OnabotulinumtoxinA: A Dual-Center Retrospective Observational Study
title Erenumab in Chronic Migraine Patients Who Previously Failed Five First-Line Oral Prophylactics and OnabotulinumtoxinA: A Dual-Center Retrospective Observational Study
title_full Erenumab in Chronic Migraine Patients Who Previously Failed Five First-Line Oral Prophylactics and OnabotulinumtoxinA: A Dual-Center Retrospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Erenumab in Chronic Migraine Patients Who Previously Failed Five First-Line Oral Prophylactics and OnabotulinumtoxinA: A Dual-Center Retrospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Erenumab in Chronic Migraine Patients Who Previously Failed Five First-Line Oral Prophylactics and OnabotulinumtoxinA: A Dual-Center Retrospective Observational Study
title_short Erenumab in Chronic Migraine Patients Who Previously Failed Five First-Line Oral Prophylactics and OnabotulinumtoxinA: A Dual-Center Retrospective Observational Study
title_sort erenumab in chronic migraine patients who previously failed five first-line oral prophylactics and onabotulinumtoxina: a dual-center retrospective observational study
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7270347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00417
work_keys_str_mv AT raffaellibianca erenumabinchronicmigrainepatientswhopreviouslyfailedfivefirstlineoralprophylacticsandonabotulinumtoxinaadualcenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kalantzisrea erenumabinchronicmigrainepatientswhopreviouslyfailedfivefirstlineoralprophylacticsandonabotulinumtoxinaadualcenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT mecklenburgjasper erenumabinchronicmigrainepatientswhopreviouslyfailedfivefirstlineoralprophylacticsandonabotulinumtoxinaadualcenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT overeemlucashendrik erenumabinchronicmigrainepatientswhopreviouslyfailedfivefirstlineoralprophylacticsandonabotulinumtoxinaadualcenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT neeblars erenumabinchronicmigrainepatientswhopreviouslyfailedfivefirstlineoralprophylacticsandonabotulinumtoxinaadualcenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT gendollaastrid erenumabinchronicmigrainepatientswhopreviouslyfailedfivefirstlineoralprophylacticsandonabotulinumtoxinaadualcenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT reuteruwe erenumabinchronicmigrainepatientswhopreviouslyfailedfivefirstlineoralprophylacticsandonabotulinumtoxinaadualcenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy