Cargando…

Variation in surgical treatment advice for women with stress urinary incontinence: a study using clinical case vignettes

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine how recommendations of gynaecologists on surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were influenced by patient characteristics. METHODS: Two hundred forty-five gynaecologists in the UK fully responded to an online questionnaire inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mamza, Jil Billy, Geary, Rebecca, El-Hamamsy, Dina, Gurol, Ipek, Duckett, Jonathan, Mahmood, Tahir, Monga, Ash, Toozs-Hobson, Philip, Wilson, Andrew, Tincello, Douglas, Van der Meulen, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7270981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32253488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04295-4
_version_ 1783542001167237120
author Mamza, Jil Billy
Geary, Rebecca
El-Hamamsy, Dina
Gurol, Ipek
Duckett, Jonathan
Mahmood, Tahir
Monga, Ash
Toozs-Hobson, Philip
Wilson, Andrew
Tincello, Douglas
Van der Meulen, Jan
author_facet Mamza, Jil Billy
Geary, Rebecca
El-Hamamsy, Dina
Gurol, Ipek
Duckett, Jonathan
Mahmood, Tahir
Monga, Ash
Toozs-Hobson, Philip
Wilson, Andrew
Tincello, Douglas
Van der Meulen, Jan
author_sort Mamza, Jil Billy
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine how recommendations of gynaecologists on surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were influenced by patient characteristics. METHODS: Two hundred forty-five gynaecologists in the UK fully responded to an online questionnaire including 18 vignettes describing 7 clinical characteristics of women with SUI (age, body mass index, SUI type, previous SUI surgery, frequency of leakage, bother, physical status). The gynaecologists scored recommendations for surgery ranging from 1 ‘certainly not’ to 5 ‘certainly yes’. Mean scores were used to calculate the relative impact (‘weight’) of each clinical characteristic. Latent class analysis was used to distinguish groups of gynaecologists with a particular practice style because they responded to the patient characteristics captured in the case vignettes in a similar way. RESULTS: The gynaecologists’ overall average recommendation score was 2.9 (interquartile range 2 to 4). All patient characteristics significantly influenced the recommendation scores (p always < 0.001) but their impact was relatively small. SUI type was most important (weight 23%), followed by previous SUI surgery (weight 21%). Latent class analysis identified five groups of gynaecologists with practice styles that differed mainly with respect to their mean recommendation score, ranging from 1.3 to 4.0. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment advice in response to case vignettes was only minimally influenced by patient characteristics. There were five groups of gynaecologists whose inclination to recommend surgical treatment varied. This suggests that there is lack of consensus on the role of surgery as a treatment for SUI. A considerable number of gynaecologists were reluctant to recommend surgery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-020-04295-4) contains supplementary material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7270981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72709812020-06-15 Variation in surgical treatment advice for women with stress urinary incontinence: a study using clinical case vignettes Mamza, Jil Billy Geary, Rebecca El-Hamamsy, Dina Gurol, Ipek Duckett, Jonathan Mahmood, Tahir Monga, Ash Toozs-Hobson, Philip Wilson, Andrew Tincello, Douglas Van der Meulen, Jan Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine how recommendations of gynaecologists on surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were influenced by patient characteristics. METHODS: Two hundred forty-five gynaecologists in the UK fully responded to an online questionnaire including 18 vignettes describing 7 clinical characteristics of women with SUI (age, body mass index, SUI type, previous SUI surgery, frequency of leakage, bother, physical status). The gynaecologists scored recommendations for surgery ranging from 1 ‘certainly not’ to 5 ‘certainly yes’. Mean scores were used to calculate the relative impact (‘weight’) of each clinical characteristic. Latent class analysis was used to distinguish groups of gynaecologists with a particular practice style because they responded to the patient characteristics captured in the case vignettes in a similar way. RESULTS: The gynaecologists’ overall average recommendation score was 2.9 (interquartile range 2 to 4). All patient characteristics significantly influenced the recommendation scores (p always < 0.001) but their impact was relatively small. SUI type was most important (weight 23%), followed by previous SUI surgery (weight 21%). Latent class analysis identified five groups of gynaecologists with practice styles that differed mainly with respect to their mean recommendation score, ranging from 1.3 to 4.0. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment advice in response to case vignettes was only minimally influenced by patient characteristics. There were five groups of gynaecologists whose inclination to recommend surgical treatment varied. This suggests that there is lack of consensus on the role of surgery as a treatment for SUI. A considerable number of gynaecologists were reluctant to recommend surgery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-020-04295-4) contains supplementary material. Springer International Publishing 2020-04-06 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7270981/ /pubmed/32253488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04295-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mamza, Jil Billy
Geary, Rebecca
El-Hamamsy, Dina
Gurol, Ipek
Duckett, Jonathan
Mahmood, Tahir
Monga, Ash
Toozs-Hobson, Philip
Wilson, Andrew
Tincello, Douglas
Van der Meulen, Jan
Variation in surgical treatment advice for women with stress urinary incontinence: a study using clinical case vignettes
title Variation in surgical treatment advice for women with stress urinary incontinence: a study using clinical case vignettes
title_full Variation in surgical treatment advice for women with stress urinary incontinence: a study using clinical case vignettes
title_fullStr Variation in surgical treatment advice for women with stress urinary incontinence: a study using clinical case vignettes
title_full_unstemmed Variation in surgical treatment advice for women with stress urinary incontinence: a study using clinical case vignettes
title_short Variation in surgical treatment advice for women with stress urinary incontinence: a study using clinical case vignettes
title_sort variation in surgical treatment advice for women with stress urinary incontinence: a study using clinical case vignettes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7270981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32253488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04295-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mamzajilbilly variationinsurgicaltreatmentadviceforwomenwithstressurinaryincontinenceastudyusingclinicalcasevignettes
AT gearyrebecca variationinsurgicaltreatmentadviceforwomenwithstressurinaryincontinenceastudyusingclinicalcasevignettes
AT elhamamsydina variationinsurgicaltreatmentadviceforwomenwithstressurinaryincontinenceastudyusingclinicalcasevignettes
AT gurolipek variationinsurgicaltreatmentadviceforwomenwithstressurinaryincontinenceastudyusingclinicalcasevignettes
AT duckettjonathan variationinsurgicaltreatmentadviceforwomenwithstressurinaryincontinenceastudyusingclinicalcasevignettes
AT mahmoodtahir variationinsurgicaltreatmentadviceforwomenwithstressurinaryincontinenceastudyusingclinicalcasevignettes
AT mongaash variationinsurgicaltreatmentadviceforwomenwithstressurinaryincontinenceastudyusingclinicalcasevignettes
AT toozshobsonphilip variationinsurgicaltreatmentadviceforwomenwithstressurinaryincontinenceastudyusingclinicalcasevignettes
AT wilsonandrew variationinsurgicaltreatmentadviceforwomenwithstressurinaryincontinenceastudyusingclinicalcasevignettes
AT tincellodouglas variationinsurgicaltreatmentadviceforwomenwithstressurinaryincontinenceastudyusingclinicalcasevignettes
AT vandermeulenjan variationinsurgicaltreatmentadviceforwomenwithstressurinaryincontinenceastudyusingclinicalcasevignettes