Cargando…

Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: a useful clinical tool

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The perineal body is a fibromuscular pyramidal structure located between the vagina and the anus. It has been difficult to image because of its small size and anatomical location. This study used 2D transperineal ultrasound to measure the perineal body and assess whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asfour, Victoria, Digesu, Giuseppe Alessandro, Fernando, Ruwan, Khullar, Vik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7270988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04166-7
_version_ 1783542002553454592
author Asfour, Victoria
Digesu, Giuseppe Alessandro
Fernando, Ruwan
Khullar, Vik
author_facet Asfour, Victoria
Digesu, Giuseppe Alessandro
Fernando, Ruwan
Khullar, Vik
author_sort Asfour, Victoria
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The perineal body is a fibromuscular pyramidal structure located between the vagina and the anus. It has been difficult to image because of its small size and anatomical location. This study used 2D transperineal ultrasound to measure the perineal body and assess whether there is an association with prolapse. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study was carried out in a tertiary level Urogynaecology department and included prolapse patients and healthy nulliparous volunteers (control group). This was a clinical assessment, including POP-Q and trans-perineal 2D ultrasound measurement of the perineal body height, length, perimeter, and area. Parametric tests were used, as the data were normally distributed. Results are reported as mean and 95% confidence interval (±95% CI). RESULTS: A total of 101 participants were recruited of which 22 were nulliparous healthy volunteers. Mean perineal body measurements in controls were height 22.5 ± 3.3 mm, length 17.4 ± 2.7 mm, perimeter 7.5 ± 0.9 mm, and area 2.8 ± 0.38 cm(2). Perineal body measurements in 79 prolapse patients: height 16.9 ± 1.7 mm, length 16.0 ± 1.4 mm, perimeter 6.5 ± 0.5 mm and area 2.1 ± 0.5 cm(2). A small perineal body was strongly associated with posterior compartment prolapse (paired t test, p < 0.0001) and wider POP-Q GH (paired t test, p = 0.0003). Surprisingly, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Perineal Body (POP-Q PB) of the two groups was not significantly different. A perineal body mid-sagittal area of less than 2.4 cm(2) has been shown to be associated strongly with posterior compartment prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to measure the perineal body on 2D ultrasound. This technique facilitates the objective diagnosis of perineal deficiency. POP-Q PB does not predict the length or area of the perineal body.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7270988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72709882020-06-15 Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: a useful clinical tool Asfour, Victoria Digesu, Giuseppe Alessandro Fernando, Ruwan Khullar, Vik Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The perineal body is a fibromuscular pyramidal structure located between the vagina and the anus. It has been difficult to image because of its small size and anatomical location. This study used 2D transperineal ultrasound to measure the perineal body and assess whether there is an association with prolapse. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study was carried out in a tertiary level Urogynaecology department and included prolapse patients and healthy nulliparous volunteers (control group). This was a clinical assessment, including POP-Q and trans-perineal 2D ultrasound measurement of the perineal body height, length, perimeter, and area. Parametric tests were used, as the data were normally distributed. Results are reported as mean and 95% confidence interval (±95% CI). RESULTS: A total of 101 participants were recruited of which 22 were nulliparous healthy volunteers. Mean perineal body measurements in controls were height 22.5 ± 3.3 mm, length 17.4 ± 2.7 mm, perimeter 7.5 ± 0.9 mm, and area 2.8 ± 0.38 cm(2). Perineal body measurements in 79 prolapse patients: height 16.9 ± 1.7 mm, length 16.0 ± 1.4 mm, perimeter 6.5 ± 0.5 mm and area 2.1 ± 0.5 cm(2). A small perineal body was strongly associated with posterior compartment prolapse (paired t test, p < 0.0001) and wider POP-Q GH (paired t test, p = 0.0003). Surprisingly, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Perineal Body (POP-Q PB) of the two groups was not significantly different. A perineal body mid-sagittal area of less than 2.4 cm(2) has been shown to be associated strongly with posterior compartment prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to measure the perineal body on 2D ultrasound. This technique facilitates the objective diagnosis of perineal deficiency. POP-Q PB does not predict the length or area of the perineal body. Springer International Publishing 2019-12-11 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7270988/ /pubmed/31828399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04166-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Asfour, Victoria
Digesu, Giuseppe Alessandro
Fernando, Ruwan
Khullar, Vik
Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: a useful clinical tool
title Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: a useful clinical tool
title_full Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: a useful clinical tool
title_fullStr Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: a useful clinical tool
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: a useful clinical tool
title_short Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: a useful clinical tool
title_sort ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: a useful clinical tool
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7270988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04166-7
work_keys_str_mv AT asfourvictoria ultrasoundimagingoftheperinealbodyausefulclinicaltool
AT digesugiuseppealessandro ultrasoundimagingoftheperinealbodyausefulclinicaltool
AT fernandoruwan ultrasoundimagingoftheperinealbodyausefulclinicaltool
AT khullarvik ultrasoundimagingoftheperinealbodyausefulclinicaltool