Cargando…

Competency assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing: development and reliability evaluation

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic suturing can be technically challenging and requires extensive training to achieve competency. To date no specific and objective assessment method for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying is available that can guide training and monitor performance in these complex surgical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: IJgosse, Wouter M., Leijte, Erik, Ganni, Sandeep, Luursema, Jan-Maarten, Francis, Nader K., Jakimowicz, Jack J., Botden, Sanne M. B. I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31451918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07077-2
_version_ 1783542008376197120
author IJgosse, Wouter M.
Leijte, Erik
Ganni, Sandeep
Luursema, Jan-Maarten
Francis, Nader K.
Jakimowicz, Jack J.
Botden, Sanne M. B. I.
author_facet IJgosse, Wouter M.
Leijte, Erik
Ganni, Sandeep
Luursema, Jan-Maarten
Francis, Nader K.
Jakimowicz, Jack J.
Botden, Sanne M. B. I.
author_sort IJgosse, Wouter M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic suturing can be technically challenging and requires extensive training to achieve competency. To date no specific and objective assessment method for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying is available that can guide training and monitor performance in these complex surgical skills. In this study we aimed to develop a laparoscopic suturing competency assessment tool (LS-CAT) and assess its inter-observer reliability. METHODS: We developed a bespoke CAT tool for laparoscopic suturing through a structured, mixed methodology approach, overseen by a steering committee with experience in developing surgical assessment tools. A wide Delphi consultation with over twelve experts in laparoscopic surgery guided the development stages of the tool. Following, subjects with different levels of laparoscopic expertise were included to evaluate this tool, using a simulated laparoscopic suturing task which involved placing of two surgical knots. A research assistant video recorded and anonymised each performance. Two blinded expert surgeons assessed the anonymised videos using the developed LS-CAT. The LS-CAT scores of the two experts were compared to assess the inter-observer reliability. Lastly, we compared the subjects’ LS-CAT performance scores at the beginning and end of their learning curve. RESULTS: This study evaluated a novel LS-CAT performance tool, comprising of four tasks. Thirty-six complete videos were analysed and evaluated with the LS-CAT, of which the scores demonstrated excellent inter-observer reliability. Cohen’s Kappa analysis revealed good to excellent levels of agreement for almost all tasks of both instrument handling and tissue handling (0.87; 0.77; 0.75; 0.86; 0.85, all with p < 0.001). Subjects performed significantly better at the end of their learning curve compared to their first attempt for all LS-CAT items (all with p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We developed the LS-CAT, which is a laparoscopic suturing grading matrix, with excellent inter-rater reliability and to discriminate between experience levels. This LS-CAT has a potential for wider use to objectively assess laparoscopic suturing skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7271015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72710152020-06-15 Competency assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing: development and reliability evaluation IJgosse, Wouter M. Leijte, Erik Ganni, Sandeep Luursema, Jan-Maarten Francis, Nader K. Jakimowicz, Jack J. Botden, Sanne M. B. I. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic suturing can be technically challenging and requires extensive training to achieve competency. To date no specific and objective assessment method for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying is available that can guide training and monitor performance in these complex surgical skills. In this study we aimed to develop a laparoscopic suturing competency assessment tool (LS-CAT) and assess its inter-observer reliability. METHODS: We developed a bespoke CAT tool for laparoscopic suturing through a structured, mixed methodology approach, overseen by a steering committee with experience in developing surgical assessment tools. A wide Delphi consultation with over twelve experts in laparoscopic surgery guided the development stages of the tool. Following, subjects with different levels of laparoscopic expertise were included to evaluate this tool, using a simulated laparoscopic suturing task which involved placing of two surgical knots. A research assistant video recorded and anonymised each performance. Two blinded expert surgeons assessed the anonymised videos using the developed LS-CAT. The LS-CAT scores of the two experts were compared to assess the inter-observer reliability. Lastly, we compared the subjects’ LS-CAT performance scores at the beginning and end of their learning curve. RESULTS: This study evaluated a novel LS-CAT performance tool, comprising of four tasks. Thirty-six complete videos were analysed and evaluated with the LS-CAT, of which the scores demonstrated excellent inter-observer reliability. Cohen’s Kappa analysis revealed good to excellent levels of agreement for almost all tasks of both instrument handling and tissue handling (0.87; 0.77; 0.75; 0.86; 0.85, all with p < 0.001). Subjects performed significantly better at the end of their learning curve compared to their first attempt for all LS-CAT items (all with p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We developed the LS-CAT, which is a laparoscopic suturing grading matrix, with excellent inter-rater reliability and to discriminate between experience levels. This LS-CAT has a potential for wider use to objectively assess laparoscopic suturing skills. Springer US 2019-08-26 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7271015/ /pubmed/31451918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07077-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
IJgosse, Wouter M.
Leijte, Erik
Ganni, Sandeep
Luursema, Jan-Maarten
Francis, Nader K.
Jakimowicz, Jack J.
Botden, Sanne M. B. I.
Competency assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing: development and reliability evaluation
title Competency assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing: development and reliability evaluation
title_full Competency assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing: development and reliability evaluation
title_fullStr Competency assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing: development and reliability evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Competency assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing: development and reliability evaluation
title_short Competency assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing: development and reliability evaluation
title_sort competency assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing: development and reliability evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31451918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07077-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ijgossewouterm competencyassessmenttoolforlaparoscopicsuturingdevelopmentandreliabilityevaluation
AT leijteerik competencyassessmenttoolforlaparoscopicsuturingdevelopmentandreliabilityevaluation
AT gannisandeep competencyassessmenttoolforlaparoscopicsuturingdevelopmentandreliabilityevaluation
AT luursemajanmaarten competencyassessmenttoolforlaparoscopicsuturingdevelopmentandreliabilityevaluation
AT francisnaderk competencyassessmenttoolforlaparoscopicsuturingdevelopmentandreliabilityevaluation
AT jakimowiczjackj competencyassessmenttoolforlaparoscopicsuturingdevelopmentandreliabilityevaluation
AT botdensannembi competencyassessmenttoolforlaparoscopicsuturingdevelopmentandreliabilityevaluation