Cargando…
Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Performance Benchmarks Lead to High Expected Efficacy
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Participation goals for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the USA have not been met. Non-invasive screening strategies may improve CRC screening participation. We highlight recent literature on stool-based screening performance and expectations for emerging non-invasive screeni...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32494878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11894-020-00770-6 |
_version_ | 1783542014245076992 |
---|---|
author | Ebner, Derek W. Kisiel, John B. |
author_facet | Ebner, Derek W. Kisiel, John B. |
author_sort | Ebner, Derek W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Participation goals for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the USA have not been met. Non-invasive screening strategies may improve CRC screening participation. We highlight recent literature on stool-based screening performance and expectations for emerging non-invasive screening tests. RECENT FINDINGS: Stool-based CRC screening detects screen-relevant colorectal neoplasia and outperforms a currently available plasma assay. Though modestly sensitive for CRC, adherence to annual fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is sub-optimal. Multi-target stool DNA (MT-sDNA) has greater adherence, superior sensitivity for screen-relevant lesions (including those in the proximal colon and sessile serrated architecture), and equivalent specificity to FIT over a 3-year period. SUMMARY: Stool-based CRC screening tests are anticipated to reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC through detection of early-stage cancers and high-risk polyps. These endpoints in performance will need to be met by emerging blood sample–based tests in order have meaningful impact in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7271040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72710402020-06-15 Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Performance Benchmarks Lead to High Expected Efficacy Ebner, Derek W. Kisiel, John B. Curr Gastroenterol Rep GI Oncology (R Bresalier, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Participation goals for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the USA have not been met. Non-invasive screening strategies may improve CRC screening participation. We highlight recent literature on stool-based screening performance and expectations for emerging non-invasive screening tests. RECENT FINDINGS: Stool-based CRC screening detects screen-relevant colorectal neoplasia and outperforms a currently available plasma assay. Though modestly sensitive for CRC, adherence to annual fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is sub-optimal. Multi-target stool DNA (MT-sDNA) has greater adherence, superior sensitivity for screen-relevant lesions (including those in the proximal colon and sessile serrated architecture), and equivalent specificity to FIT over a 3-year period. SUMMARY: Stool-based CRC screening tests are anticipated to reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC through detection of early-stage cancers and high-risk polyps. These endpoints in performance will need to be met by emerging blood sample–based tests in order have meaningful impact in clinical practice. Springer US 2020-06-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7271040/ /pubmed/32494878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11894-020-00770-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | GI Oncology (R Bresalier, Section Editor) Ebner, Derek W. Kisiel, John B. Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Performance Benchmarks Lead to High Expected Efficacy |
title | Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Performance Benchmarks Lead to High Expected Efficacy |
title_full | Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Performance Benchmarks Lead to High Expected Efficacy |
title_fullStr | Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Performance Benchmarks Lead to High Expected Efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Performance Benchmarks Lead to High Expected Efficacy |
title_short | Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Performance Benchmarks Lead to High Expected Efficacy |
title_sort | stool-based tests for colorectal cancer screening: performance benchmarks lead to high expected efficacy |
topic | GI Oncology (R Bresalier, Section Editor) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32494878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11894-020-00770-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ebnerderekw stoolbasedtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningperformancebenchmarksleadtohighexpectedefficacy AT kisieljohnb stoolbasedtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningperformancebenchmarksleadtohighexpectedefficacy |