Cargando…
Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review
BACKGROUND: More people living into old age with dementia. The complexity of treatment and care, particularly those with multiple health problems, can be experienced as disjointed. As part of an evaluation of a ‘healthcare passport’ for people living with dementia we undertook a realist review of co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05366-4 |
_version_ | 1783542090142056448 |
---|---|
author | Leavey, Gerard Curran, Emma Fullerton, Deirdre Todd, Steven McIlfatrick, Sonja Coates, Vivien Watson, Max Abbott, Aine Corry, Dagmar |
author_facet | Leavey, Gerard Curran, Emma Fullerton, Deirdre Todd, Steven McIlfatrick, Sonja Coates, Vivien Watson, Max Abbott, Aine Corry, Dagmar |
author_sort | Leavey, Gerard |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: More people living into old age with dementia. The complexity of treatment and care, particularly those with multiple health problems, can be experienced as disjointed. As part of an evaluation of a ‘healthcare passport’ for people living with dementia we undertook a realist review of communication tools within health and social care for people living with dementia. AIMS: To explore how a ‘healthcare passport’ might work in the ‘real world’ of people living with dementia through a better understanding of the theoretical issues related to, and the contextual issues that facilitate, successful communication. METHODS: A realist review was considered the most appropriate methodology to inform the further development and evaluation of the healthcare passport. We undertook a purposive literature search related to communication tools to identify (a) underlying programme theories; (b) published reports and papers on their use in various healthcare settings; (c) evidence on barriers and facliitators of their use. RESULTS: Communication tools were noted as a way of improving communication and outcomes through: (1) improvement of service user autonomy; (2) strengthening the therapeutic alliance; and (3) building integrated care. However, while intuitively perceived to of benefit, evidence on their use is limited and key barriers to their acceptance and use include: (1) difficulties in clearly defining purpose, content, ownership and usage; (2) understanding the role of family caregivers; and (3) preparation among healthcare professionsals. CONCLUSION: Patient-held communication tools may be helpful to some people living with dementia but will require considerable preparation and engagement with key stakeholders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7271433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72714332020-06-08 Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review Leavey, Gerard Curran, Emma Fullerton, Deirdre Todd, Steven McIlfatrick, Sonja Coates, Vivien Watson, Max Abbott, Aine Corry, Dagmar BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: More people living into old age with dementia. The complexity of treatment and care, particularly those with multiple health problems, can be experienced as disjointed. As part of an evaluation of a ‘healthcare passport’ for people living with dementia we undertook a realist review of communication tools within health and social care for people living with dementia. AIMS: To explore how a ‘healthcare passport’ might work in the ‘real world’ of people living with dementia through a better understanding of the theoretical issues related to, and the contextual issues that facilitate, successful communication. METHODS: A realist review was considered the most appropriate methodology to inform the further development and evaluation of the healthcare passport. We undertook a purposive literature search related to communication tools to identify (a) underlying programme theories; (b) published reports and papers on their use in various healthcare settings; (c) evidence on barriers and facliitators of their use. RESULTS: Communication tools were noted as a way of improving communication and outcomes through: (1) improvement of service user autonomy; (2) strengthening the therapeutic alliance; and (3) building integrated care. However, while intuitively perceived to of benefit, evidence on their use is limited and key barriers to their acceptance and use include: (1) difficulties in clearly defining purpose, content, ownership and usage; (2) understanding the role of family caregivers; and (3) preparation among healthcare professionsals. CONCLUSION: Patient-held communication tools may be helpful to some people living with dementia but will require considerable preparation and engagement with key stakeholders. BioMed Central 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7271433/ /pubmed/32498684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05366-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Leavey, Gerard Curran, Emma Fullerton, Deirdre Todd, Steven McIlfatrick, Sonja Coates, Vivien Watson, Max Abbott, Aine Corry, Dagmar Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review |
title | Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review |
title_full | Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review |
title_fullStr | Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review |
title_short | Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review |
title_sort | patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05366-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leaveygerard patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview AT curranemma patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview AT fullertondeirdre patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview AT toddsteven patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview AT mcilfatricksonja patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview AT coatesvivien patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview AT watsonmax patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview AT abbottaine patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview AT corrydagmar patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview |