Cargando…

Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review

BACKGROUND: More people living into old age with dementia. The complexity of treatment and care, particularly those with multiple health problems, can be experienced as disjointed. As part of an evaluation of a ‘healthcare passport’ for people living with dementia we undertook a realist review of co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leavey, Gerard, Curran, Emma, Fullerton, Deirdre, Todd, Steven, McIlfatrick, Sonja, Coates, Vivien, Watson, Max, Abbott, Aine, Corry, Dagmar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05366-4
_version_ 1783542090142056448
author Leavey, Gerard
Curran, Emma
Fullerton, Deirdre
Todd, Steven
McIlfatrick, Sonja
Coates, Vivien
Watson, Max
Abbott, Aine
Corry, Dagmar
author_facet Leavey, Gerard
Curran, Emma
Fullerton, Deirdre
Todd, Steven
McIlfatrick, Sonja
Coates, Vivien
Watson, Max
Abbott, Aine
Corry, Dagmar
author_sort Leavey, Gerard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: More people living into old age with dementia. The complexity of treatment and care, particularly those with multiple health problems, can be experienced as disjointed. As part of an evaluation of a ‘healthcare passport’ for people living with dementia we undertook a realist review of communication tools within health and social care for people living with dementia. AIMS: To explore how a ‘healthcare passport’ might work in the ‘real world’ of people living with dementia through a better understanding of the theoretical issues related to, and the contextual issues that facilitate, successful communication. METHODS: A realist review was considered the most appropriate methodology to inform the further development and evaluation of the healthcare passport. We undertook a purposive literature search related to communication tools to identify (a) underlying programme theories; (b) published reports and papers on their use in various healthcare settings; (c) evidence on barriers and facliitators of their use. RESULTS: Communication tools were noted as a way of improving communication and outcomes through: (1) improvement of service user autonomy; (2) strengthening the therapeutic alliance; and (3) building integrated care. However, while intuitively perceived to of benefit, evidence on their use is limited and key barriers to their acceptance and use include: (1) difficulties in clearly defining purpose, content, ownership and usage; (2) understanding the role of family caregivers; and (3) preparation among healthcare professionsals. CONCLUSION: Patient-held communication tools may be helpful to some people living with dementia but will require considerable preparation and engagement with key stakeholders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7271433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72714332020-06-08 Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review Leavey, Gerard Curran, Emma Fullerton, Deirdre Todd, Steven McIlfatrick, Sonja Coates, Vivien Watson, Max Abbott, Aine Corry, Dagmar BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: More people living into old age with dementia. The complexity of treatment and care, particularly those with multiple health problems, can be experienced as disjointed. As part of an evaluation of a ‘healthcare passport’ for people living with dementia we undertook a realist review of communication tools within health and social care for people living with dementia. AIMS: To explore how a ‘healthcare passport’ might work in the ‘real world’ of people living with dementia through a better understanding of the theoretical issues related to, and the contextual issues that facilitate, successful communication. METHODS: A realist review was considered the most appropriate methodology to inform the further development and evaluation of the healthcare passport. We undertook a purposive literature search related to communication tools to identify (a) underlying programme theories; (b) published reports and papers on their use in various healthcare settings; (c) evidence on barriers and facliitators of their use. RESULTS: Communication tools were noted as a way of improving communication and outcomes through: (1) improvement of service user autonomy; (2) strengthening the therapeutic alliance; and (3) building integrated care. However, while intuitively perceived to of benefit, evidence on their use is limited and key barriers to their acceptance and use include: (1) difficulties in clearly defining purpose, content, ownership and usage; (2) understanding the role of family caregivers; and (3) preparation among healthcare professionsals. CONCLUSION: Patient-held communication tools may be helpful to some people living with dementia but will require considerable preparation and engagement with key stakeholders. BioMed Central 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7271433/ /pubmed/32498684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05366-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leavey, Gerard
Curran, Emma
Fullerton, Deirdre
Todd, Steven
McIlfatrick, Sonja
Coates, Vivien
Watson, Max
Abbott, Aine
Corry, Dagmar
Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review
title Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review
title_full Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review
title_fullStr Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review
title_full_unstemmed Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review
title_short Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review
title_sort patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05366-4
work_keys_str_mv AT leaveygerard patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview
AT curranemma patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview
AT fullertondeirdre patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview
AT toddsteven patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview
AT mcilfatricksonja patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview
AT coatesvivien patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview
AT watsonmax patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview
AT abbottaine patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview
AT corrydagmar patientandservicerelatedbarriersandfacitatorstotheacceptanceanduseofinterventionstopromotecommunicationinhealthandsocialcarearealistreview