Cargando…

Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort

BACKGROUND: Mobile intensive care units frequently manage unplanned out-of-hospital births (UOHB). Rewarming methods during pre-hospital management of UOHB have not yet been compared. The aim was to compare rewarming methods used during pre-hospital management in a large prospective cohort of UOHB i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Javaudin, François, Roche, Mélodie, Trutt, Lucile, Bunker, Isabelle, Hamel, Valérie, Goddet, Sybille, Templier, François, Potiron, Christine, Le Bastard, Quentin, Pes, Philippe, Bagou, Gilles, Chabernaud, Jean-Louis, Montassier, Emmanuel, Leclère, Brice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00750-9
_version_ 1783542090859282432
author Javaudin, François
Roche, Mélodie
Trutt, Lucile
Bunker, Isabelle
Hamel, Valérie
Goddet, Sybille
Templier, François
Potiron, Christine
Le Bastard, Quentin
Pes, Philippe
Bagou, Gilles
Chabernaud, Jean-Louis
Montassier, Emmanuel
Leclère, Brice
author_facet Javaudin, François
Roche, Mélodie
Trutt, Lucile
Bunker, Isabelle
Hamel, Valérie
Goddet, Sybille
Templier, François
Potiron, Christine
Le Bastard, Quentin
Pes, Philippe
Bagou, Gilles
Chabernaud, Jean-Louis
Montassier, Emmanuel
Leclère, Brice
author_sort Javaudin, François
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mobile intensive care units frequently manage unplanned out-of-hospital births (UOHB). Rewarming methods during pre-hospital management of UOHB have not yet been compared. The aim was to compare rewarming methods used during pre-hospital management in a large prospective cohort of UOHB in France. METHODS: We analysed UOHB from the prospective AIE cohort from 25 prehospital emergency medical services in France. The primary outcome was the change in body temperature from arrival at scene to arrival at hospital. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2018, 1854 UOHB were recorded, of whom 520 were analysed. We found that using incubator care was the most effective rewarming method (+ 0.8 °C during transport), followed by the combination of plastic bag, skin-to-skin and cap (+ 0.2 °C). The associations plastic bag + cap and skin-to-skin + cap did not allow the newborn to be warmed up but rather to maintain initial temperature (+ 0.0 °C). The results of the multivariate model were consistent with these observations, with better rewarming with the use of an incubator. We also identified circumstances of increased risk of hypothermia according to classification and regression tree, like premature birth (< 37 weeks of gestation) and/or low outside temperature (< 8.4 °C). CONCLUSIONS: Using an incubator was the most effective rewarming method during pre-hospital management of UOHB in our French prospective cohort. Based on our model, in cases of term less than 37 weeks of gestation or between 37 and 40 weeks with a low outside temperature or initial hypothermia, using such a method would be preferred.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7271438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72714382020-06-08 Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort Javaudin, François Roche, Mélodie Trutt, Lucile Bunker, Isabelle Hamel, Valérie Goddet, Sybille Templier, François Potiron, Christine Le Bastard, Quentin Pes, Philippe Bagou, Gilles Chabernaud, Jean-Louis Montassier, Emmanuel Leclère, Brice Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Mobile intensive care units frequently manage unplanned out-of-hospital births (UOHB). Rewarming methods during pre-hospital management of UOHB have not yet been compared. The aim was to compare rewarming methods used during pre-hospital management in a large prospective cohort of UOHB in France. METHODS: We analysed UOHB from the prospective AIE cohort from 25 prehospital emergency medical services in France. The primary outcome was the change in body temperature from arrival at scene to arrival at hospital. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2018, 1854 UOHB were recorded, of whom 520 were analysed. We found that using incubator care was the most effective rewarming method (+ 0.8 °C during transport), followed by the combination of plastic bag, skin-to-skin and cap (+ 0.2 °C). The associations plastic bag + cap and skin-to-skin + cap did not allow the newborn to be warmed up but rather to maintain initial temperature (+ 0.0 °C). The results of the multivariate model were consistent with these observations, with better rewarming with the use of an incubator. We also identified circumstances of increased risk of hypothermia according to classification and regression tree, like premature birth (< 37 weeks of gestation) and/or low outside temperature (< 8.4 °C). CONCLUSIONS: Using an incubator was the most effective rewarming method during pre-hospital management of UOHB in our French prospective cohort. Based on our model, in cases of term less than 37 weeks of gestation or between 37 and 40 weeks with a low outside temperature or initial hypothermia, using such a method would be preferred. BioMed Central 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7271438/ /pubmed/32493456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00750-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Research
Javaudin, François
Roche, Mélodie
Trutt, Lucile
Bunker, Isabelle
Hamel, Valérie
Goddet, Sybille
Templier, François
Potiron, Christine
Le Bastard, Quentin
Pes, Philippe
Bagou, Gilles
Chabernaud, Jean-Louis
Montassier, Emmanuel
Leclère, Brice
Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort
title Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort
title_full Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort
title_fullStr Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort
title_short Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort
title_sort assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00750-9
work_keys_str_mv AT javaudinfrancois assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT rochemelodie assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT truttlucile assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT bunkerisabelle assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT hamelvalerie assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT goddetsybille assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT templierfrancois assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT potironchristine assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT lebastardquentin assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT pesphilippe assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT bagougilles assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT chabernaudjeanlouis assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT montassieremmanuel assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT leclerebrice assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort
AT assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort