Cargando…
Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort
BACKGROUND: Mobile intensive care units frequently manage unplanned out-of-hospital births (UOHB). Rewarming methods during pre-hospital management of UOHB have not yet been compared. The aim was to compare rewarming methods used during pre-hospital management in a large prospective cohort of UOHB i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00750-9 |
_version_ | 1783542090859282432 |
---|---|
author | Javaudin, François Roche, Mélodie Trutt, Lucile Bunker, Isabelle Hamel, Valérie Goddet, Sybille Templier, François Potiron, Christine Le Bastard, Quentin Pes, Philippe Bagou, Gilles Chabernaud, Jean-Louis Montassier, Emmanuel Leclère, Brice |
author_facet | Javaudin, François Roche, Mélodie Trutt, Lucile Bunker, Isabelle Hamel, Valérie Goddet, Sybille Templier, François Potiron, Christine Le Bastard, Quentin Pes, Philippe Bagou, Gilles Chabernaud, Jean-Louis Montassier, Emmanuel Leclère, Brice |
author_sort | Javaudin, François |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mobile intensive care units frequently manage unplanned out-of-hospital births (UOHB). Rewarming methods during pre-hospital management of UOHB have not yet been compared. The aim was to compare rewarming methods used during pre-hospital management in a large prospective cohort of UOHB in France. METHODS: We analysed UOHB from the prospective AIE cohort from 25 prehospital emergency medical services in France. The primary outcome was the change in body temperature from arrival at scene to arrival at hospital. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2018, 1854 UOHB were recorded, of whom 520 were analysed. We found that using incubator care was the most effective rewarming method (+ 0.8 °C during transport), followed by the combination of plastic bag, skin-to-skin and cap (+ 0.2 °C). The associations plastic bag + cap and skin-to-skin + cap did not allow the newborn to be warmed up but rather to maintain initial temperature (+ 0.0 °C). The results of the multivariate model were consistent with these observations, with better rewarming with the use of an incubator. We also identified circumstances of increased risk of hypothermia according to classification and regression tree, like premature birth (< 37 weeks of gestation) and/or low outside temperature (< 8.4 °C). CONCLUSIONS: Using an incubator was the most effective rewarming method during pre-hospital management of UOHB in our French prospective cohort. Based on our model, in cases of term less than 37 weeks of gestation or between 37 and 40 weeks with a low outside temperature or initial hypothermia, using such a method would be preferred. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7271438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72714382020-06-08 Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort Javaudin, François Roche, Mélodie Trutt, Lucile Bunker, Isabelle Hamel, Valérie Goddet, Sybille Templier, François Potiron, Christine Le Bastard, Quentin Pes, Philippe Bagou, Gilles Chabernaud, Jean-Louis Montassier, Emmanuel Leclère, Brice Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Mobile intensive care units frequently manage unplanned out-of-hospital births (UOHB). Rewarming methods during pre-hospital management of UOHB have not yet been compared. The aim was to compare rewarming methods used during pre-hospital management in a large prospective cohort of UOHB in France. METHODS: We analysed UOHB from the prospective AIE cohort from 25 prehospital emergency medical services in France. The primary outcome was the change in body temperature from arrival at scene to arrival at hospital. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2018, 1854 UOHB were recorded, of whom 520 were analysed. We found that using incubator care was the most effective rewarming method (+ 0.8 °C during transport), followed by the combination of plastic bag, skin-to-skin and cap (+ 0.2 °C). The associations plastic bag + cap and skin-to-skin + cap did not allow the newborn to be warmed up but rather to maintain initial temperature (+ 0.0 °C). The results of the multivariate model were consistent with these observations, with better rewarming with the use of an incubator. We also identified circumstances of increased risk of hypothermia according to classification and regression tree, like premature birth (< 37 weeks of gestation) and/or low outside temperature (< 8.4 °C). CONCLUSIONS: Using an incubator was the most effective rewarming method during pre-hospital management of UOHB in our French prospective cohort. Based on our model, in cases of term less than 37 weeks of gestation or between 37 and 40 weeks with a low outside temperature or initial hypothermia, using such a method would be preferred. BioMed Central 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7271438/ /pubmed/32493456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00750-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Javaudin, François Roche, Mélodie Trutt, Lucile Bunker, Isabelle Hamel, Valérie Goddet, Sybille Templier, François Potiron, Christine Le Bastard, Quentin Pes, Philippe Bagou, Gilles Chabernaud, Jean-Louis Montassier, Emmanuel Leclère, Brice Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort |
title | Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort |
title_full | Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort |
title_fullStr | Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort |
title_short | Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort |
title_sort | assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00750-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT javaudinfrancois assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT rochemelodie assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT truttlucile assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT bunkerisabelle assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT hamelvalerie assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT goddetsybille assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT templierfrancois assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT potironchristine assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT lebastardquentin assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT pesphilippe assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT bagougilles assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT chabernaudjeanlouis assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT montassieremmanuel assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT leclerebrice assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort AT assessmentofrewarmingmethodsinunplannedoutofhospitalbirthsfromaprospectivecohort |