Cargando…

Comparison of clinical results of anteromedial and transtibial femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction

BACKGROUND: A femoral bone tunnel in ACL reconstruction can be constructed from the outside in or from the inside out. When doing it inside out, the approach can be via the anteromedial (AM) portal or through the tibial bone tunnel. It has been suggested that better results might be expected by doin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metso, Leena, Nyrhinen, Kirsi-Maaria, Bister, Ville, Sandelin, Jerker, Harilainen, Arsi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03351-w
_version_ 1783542110948950016
author Metso, Leena
Nyrhinen, Kirsi-Maaria
Bister, Ville
Sandelin, Jerker
Harilainen, Arsi
author_facet Metso, Leena
Nyrhinen, Kirsi-Maaria
Bister, Ville
Sandelin, Jerker
Harilainen, Arsi
author_sort Metso, Leena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A femoral bone tunnel in ACL reconstruction can be constructed from the outside in or from the inside out. When doing it inside out, the approach can be via the anteromedial (AM) portal or through the tibial bone tunnel. It has been suggested that better results might be expected by doing it anteromedially. Clinical results after femoral tunnel drilling via the AM or transtibial (TT) techniques in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are presented. METHODS: Three hundred patients with ACL injuries were chosen for this study from previously collected data on ACL reconstructions. They were divided into two groups: 150 patients treated with AM drilling and 150 treated with TT drilling. In the AM group, the reconstructions were performed using a semitendinosus graft with the Tape Locking Screw (TLS™) technique (n = 87) or Retrobutton™ femoral and BioScrew™ tibial fixation with a semitendinosus-gracilis graft (n = 63). In the TT group, the fixation method used was Rigidfix™ femoral and Intrafix tibial fixation with a semitendinosus-gracilis graft. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, knee scores (Lysholm, Tegner and IKDC) and instrumented laxity measurements (KT-2000™). Our aim was to evaluate if there was better rotational stability and therefore better clinical results when using AM drilling compared to TT drilling. RESULTS: After excluding revision ACL reconstructions, there were 132 patients in the AM group and 133 in the TT group for evaluation. At the 2-year follow-up, there were 60 patients in the AM group (45.5%) and 58 in the TT group (43.6%). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in any of the evaluation methods used. CONCLUSION: Both drilling techniques resulted in improved patient performance and satisfaction. We found no data supporting the hypothesis that the AM drilling technique provides better rotational stability to the knee. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry with study ID ISRCTN16407730. Retrospectively registered Jan 9th 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7271541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72715412020-06-08 Comparison of clinical results of anteromedial and transtibial femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction Metso, Leena Nyrhinen, Kirsi-Maaria Bister, Ville Sandelin, Jerker Harilainen, Arsi BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: A femoral bone tunnel in ACL reconstruction can be constructed from the outside in or from the inside out. When doing it inside out, the approach can be via the anteromedial (AM) portal or through the tibial bone tunnel. It has been suggested that better results might be expected by doing it anteromedially. Clinical results after femoral tunnel drilling via the AM or transtibial (TT) techniques in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are presented. METHODS: Three hundred patients with ACL injuries were chosen for this study from previously collected data on ACL reconstructions. They were divided into two groups: 150 patients treated with AM drilling and 150 treated with TT drilling. In the AM group, the reconstructions were performed using a semitendinosus graft with the Tape Locking Screw (TLS™) technique (n = 87) or Retrobutton™ femoral and BioScrew™ tibial fixation with a semitendinosus-gracilis graft (n = 63). In the TT group, the fixation method used was Rigidfix™ femoral and Intrafix tibial fixation with a semitendinosus-gracilis graft. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, knee scores (Lysholm, Tegner and IKDC) and instrumented laxity measurements (KT-2000™). Our aim was to evaluate if there was better rotational stability and therefore better clinical results when using AM drilling compared to TT drilling. RESULTS: After excluding revision ACL reconstructions, there were 132 patients in the AM group and 133 in the TT group for evaluation. At the 2-year follow-up, there were 60 patients in the AM group (45.5%) and 58 in the TT group (43.6%). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in any of the evaluation methods used. CONCLUSION: Both drilling techniques resulted in improved patient performance and satisfaction. We found no data supporting the hypothesis that the AM drilling technique provides better rotational stability to the knee. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry with study ID ISRCTN16407730. Retrospectively registered Jan 9th 2020. BioMed Central 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7271541/ /pubmed/32493289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03351-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Metso, Leena
Nyrhinen, Kirsi-Maaria
Bister, Ville
Sandelin, Jerker
Harilainen, Arsi
Comparison of clinical results of anteromedial and transtibial femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction
title Comparison of clinical results of anteromedial and transtibial femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction
title_full Comparison of clinical results of anteromedial and transtibial femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical results of anteromedial and transtibial femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical results of anteromedial and transtibial femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction
title_short Comparison of clinical results of anteromedial and transtibial femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction
title_sort comparison of clinical results of anteromedial and transtibial femoral tunnel drilling in acl reconstruction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03351-w
work_keys_str_mv AT metsoleena comparisonofclinicalresultsofanteromedialandtranstibialfemoraltunneldrillinginaclreconstruction
AT nyrhinenkirsimaaria comparisonofclinicalresultsofanteromedialandtranstibialfemoraltunneldrillinginaclreconstruction
AT bisterville comparisonofclinicalresultsofanteromedialandtranstibialfemoraltunneldrillinginaclreconstruction
AT sandelinjerker comparisonofclinicalresultsofanteromedialandtranstibialfemoraltunneldrillinginaclreconstruction
AT harilainenarsi comparisonofclinicalresultsofanteromedialandtranstibialfemoraltunneldrillinginaclreconstruction