Cargando…

Geriatric assessment in older patients with a hematologic malignancy: a systematic review

The aim of this systematic review is to give an update of all currently available evidence on the relevance of a geriatric assessment in the treatment of older patients with hematologic malignancies. A systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed to find studies in which a geriatric assessm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scheepers, Ellen R.M., Vondeling, Ariel M., Thielen, Noortje, van der Griend, René, Stauder, Reinhard, Hamaker, Marije E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ferrata Storti Foundation 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.245803
_version_ 1783542116400496640
author Scheepers, Ellen R.M.
Vondeling, Ariel M.
Thielen, Noortje
van der Griend, René
Stauder, Reinhard
Hamaker, Marije E.
author_facet Scheepers, Ellen R.M.
Vondeling, Ariel M.
Thielen, Noortje
van der Griend, René
Stauder, Reinhard
Hamaker, Marije E.
author_sort Scheepers, Ellen R.M.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this systematic review is to give an update of all currently available evidence on the relevance of a geriatric assessment in the treatment of older patients with hematologic malignancies. A systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed to find studies in which a geriatric assessment was used to detect impaired geriatric domains or to address the association between geriatric assessment and survival or clinical outcome measures. The literature search included 4,629 reports, of which 54 publications from 44 studies were included. Seventy-three percent of the studies were published in the last 5 years. The median age of the patients was 73 years (range, 58-86) and 71% had a good World Health Organization (WHO) performance status. The median prevalence of geriatric impairments varied between 17% and 68%, even in patients with a good WHO performance status. Polypharmacy, nutritional status and instrumental activities of daily living were most frequently impaired. Whereas several geriatric impairments and frailty (based on a frailty screening tool or summarized geriatric assessment score) were predictive for a shorter overall survival, WHO performance status lost its predictive value in most studies. The association between geriatric impairments and treatment-related toxicity varied, with a trend towards a higher risk of (non-)hematologic toxicity in frail patients. During the follow-up, frailty seemed to be associated with treatment non-completion, especially when patients were malnourished. Patients with a good physical capacity had a shorter stay in hospital and a lower rate of hospitalization. Geriatric assessment, even in patients with a good performance status, can detect impaired geriatric domains and these impairments may be predictive of mortality. Moreover, geriatric impairments suggest a higher risk of treatment-related toxicity, treatment non-completion and use of healthcare services. A geriatric assessment should be considered before starting treatment in older patients with hematologic malignancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7271571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Ferrata Storti Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72715712020-06-12 Geriatric assessment in older patients with a hematologic malignancy: a systematic review Scheepers, Ellen R.M. Vondeling, Ariel M. Thielen, Noortje van der Griend, René Stauder, Reinhard Hamaker, Marije E. Haematologica Review Articles The aim of this systematic review is to give an update of all currently available evidence on the relevance of a geriatric assessment in the treatment of older patients with hematologic malignancies. A systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed to find studies in which a geriatric assessment was used to detect impaired geriatric domains or to address the association between geriatric assessment and survival or clinical outcome measures. The literature search included 4,629 reports, of which 54 publications from 44 studies were included. Seventy-three percent of the studies were published in the last 5 years. The median age of the patients was 73 years (range, 58-86) and 71% had a good World Health Organization (WHO) performance status. The median prevalence of geriatric impairments varied between 17% and 68%, even in patients with a good WHO performance status. Polypharmacy, nutritional status and instrumental activities of daily living were most frequently impaired. Whereas several geriatric impairments and frailty (based on a frailty screening tool or summarized geriatric assessment score) were predictive for a shorter overall survival, WHO performance status lost its predictive value in most studies. The association between geriatric impairments and treatment-related toxicity varied, with a trend towards a higher risk of (non-)hematologic toxicity in frail patients. During the follow-up, frailty seemed to be associated with treatment non-completion, especially when patients were malnourished. Patients with a good physical capacity had a shorter stay in hospital and a lower rate of hospitalization. Geriatric assessment, even in patients with a good performance status, can detect impaired geriatric domains and these impairments may be predictive of mortality. Moreover, geriatric impairments suggest a higher risk of treatment-related toxicity, treatment non-completion and use of healthcare services. A geriatric assessment should be considered before starting treatment in older patients with hematologic malignancies. Ferrata Storti Foundation 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7271571/ /pubmed/32381581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.245803 Text en Copyright© 2020 Ferrata Storti Foundation Material published in Haematologica is covered by copyright. All rights are reserved to the Ferrata Storti Foundation. Use of published material is allowed under the following terms and conditions: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode. Copies of published material are allowed for personal or internal use. Sharing published material for non-commercial purposes is subject to the following conditions: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode, sect. 3. Reproducing and sharing published material for commercial purposes is not allowed without permission in writing from the publisher.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Scheepers, Ellen R.M.
Vondeling, Ariel M.
Thielen, Noortje
van der Griend, René
Stauder, Reinhard
Hamaker, Marije E.
Geriatric assessment in older patients with a hematologic malignancy: a systematic review
title Geriatric assessment in older patients with a hematologic malignancy: a systematic review
title_full Geriatric assessment in older patients with a hematologic malignancy: a systematic review
title_fullStr Geriatric assessment in older patients with a hematologic malignancy: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Geriatric assessment in older patients with a hematologic malignancy: a systematic review
title_short Geriatric assessment in older patients with a hematologic malignancy: a systematic review
title_sort geriatric assessment in older patients with a hematologic malignancy: a systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.245803
work_keys_str_mv AT scheepersellenrm geriatricassessmentinolderpatientswithahematologicmalignancyasystematicreview
AT vondelingarielm geriatricassessmentinolderpatientswithahematologicmalignancyasystematicreview
AT thielennoortje geriatricassessmentinolderpatientswithahematologicmalignancyasystematicreview
AT vandergriendrene geriatricassessmentinolderpatientswithahematologicmalignancyasystematicreview
AT stauderreinhard geriatricassessmentinolderpatientswithahematologicmalignancyasystematicreview
AT hamakermarijee geriatricassessmentinolderpatientswithahematologicmalignancyasystematicreview