Cargando…

Impact of respiratory motion correction on lesion visibility and quantification in thoracic PET/MR imaging

The impact of a method for MR-based respiratory motion correction of PET data on lesion visibility and quantification in patients with oncologic findings in the lung was evaluated. Twenty patients with one or more lesions in the lung were included. Hybrid imaging was performed on an integrated PET/M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gratz, Marcel, Ruhlmann, Verena, Umutlu, Lale, Fenchel, Matthias, Hong, Inki, Quick, Harald H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7272064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32497135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233209
_version_ 1783542190223392768
author Gratz, Marcel
Ruhlmann, Verena
Umutlu, Lale
Fenchel, Matthias
Hong, Inki
Quick, Harald H.
author_facet Gratz, Marcel
Ruhlmann, Verena
Umutlu, Lale
Fenchel, Matthias
Hong, Inki
Quick, Harald H.
author_sort Gratz, Marcel
collection PubMed
description The impact of a method for MR-based respiratory motion correction of PET data on lesion visibility and quantification in patients with oncologic findings in the lung was evaluated. Twenty patients with one or more lesions in the lung were included. Hybrid imaging was performed on an integrated PET/MR system using (18)F-FDG as radiotracer. The standard thoracic imaging protocol was extended by a free-breathing self-gated acquisition of MR data for motion modelling. PET data was acquired simultaneously in list-mode for 5-10 mins. One experienced radiologist and one experienced nuclear medicine specialist evaluated and compared the post-processed data in consensus regarding lesion visibility (scores 1–4, 4 being best), image noise levels (scores 1–3, 3 being lowest noise), SUVmean and SUVmax. Motion-corrected (MoCo) images were additionally compared with gated images. Non-motion-corrected free-breathing data served as standard of reference in this study. Motion correction generally improved lesion visibility (3.19 ± 0.63) and noise ratings (2.95 ± 0.22) compared to uncorrected (2.81 ± 0.66 and 2.95 ± 0.22, respectively) or gated PET data (2.47 ± 0.93 and 1.30 ± 0.47, respectively). Furthermore, SUVs (mean and max) were compared for all methods to estimate their respective impact on the quantification. Deviations of SUVmax were smallest between the uncorrected and the MoCo lesion data (average increase of 9.1% of MoCo SUVs), while SUVmean agreed best for gated and MoCo reconstructions (MoCo SUVs increased by 1.2%). The studied method for MR-based respiratory motion correction of PET data combines increased lesion sharpness and improved lesion activity quantification with high signal-to-noise ratio in a clinical setting. In particular, the detection of small lesions in moving organs such as the lung and liver may thus be facilitated. These advantages justify the extension of the PET/MR imaging protocol by 5–10 minutes for motion correction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7272064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72720642020-06-09 Impact of respiratory motion correction on lesion visibility and quantification in thoracic PET/MR imaging Gratz, Marcel Ruhlmann, Verena Umutlu, Lale Fenchel, Matthias Hong, Inki Quick, Harald H. PLoS One Research Article The impact of a method for MR-based respiratory motion correction of PET data on lesion visibility and quantification in patients with oncologic findings in the lung was evaluated. Twenty patients with one or more lesions in the lung were included. Hybrid imaging was performed on an integrated PET/MR system using (18)F-FDG as radiotracer. The standard thoracic imaging protocol was extended by a free-breathing self-gated acquisition of MR data for motion modelling. PET data was acquired simultaneously in list-mode for 5-10 mins. One experienced radiologist and one experienced nuclear medicine specialist evaluated and compared the post-processed data in consensus regarding lesion visibility (scores 1–4, 4 being best), image noise levels (scores 1–3, 3 being lowest noise), SUVmean and SUVmax. Motion-corrected (MoCo) images were additionally compared with gated images. Non-motion-corrected free-breathing data served as standard of reference in this study. Motion correction generally improved lesion visibility (3.19 ± 0.63) and noise ratings (2.95 ± 0.22) compared to uncorrected (2.81 ± 0.66 and 2.95 ± 0.22, respectively) or gated PET data (2.47 ± 0.93 and 1.30 ± 0.47, respectively). Furthermore, SUVs (mean and max) were compared for all methods to estimate their respective impact on the quantification. Deviations of SUVmax were smallest between the uncorrected and the MoCo lesion data (average increase of 9.1% of MoCo SUVs), while SUVmean agreed best for gated and MoCo reconstructions (MoCo SUVs increased by 1.2%). The studied method for MR-based respiratory motion correction of PET data combines increased lesion sharpness and improved lesion activity quantification with high signal-to-noise ratio in a clinical setting. In particular, the detection of small lesions in moving organs such as the lung and liver may thus be facilitated. These advantages justify the extension of the PET/MR imaging protocol by 5–10 minutes for motion correction. Public Library of Science 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7272064/ /pubmed/32497135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233209 Text en © 2020 Gratz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gratz, Marcel
Ruhlmann, Verena
Umutlu, Lale
Fenchel, Matthias
Hong, Inki
Quick, Harald H.
Impact of respiratory motion correction on lesion visibility and quantification in thoracic PET/MR imaging
title Impact of respiratory motion correction on lesion visibility and quantification in thoracic PET/MR imaging
title_full Impact of respiratory motion correction on lesion visibility and quantification in thoracic PET/MR imaging
title_fullStr Impact of respiratory motion correction on lesion visibility and quantification in thoracic PET/MR imaging
title_full_unstemmed Impact of respiratory motion correction on lesion visibility and quantification in thoracic PET/MR imaging
title_short Impact of respiratory motion correction on lesion visibility and quantification in thoracic PET/MR imaging
title_sort impact of respiratory motion correction on lesion visibility and quantification in thoracic pet/mr imaging
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7272064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32497135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233209
work_keys_str_mv AT gratzmarcel impactofrespiratorymotioncorrectiononlesionvisibilityandquantificationinthoracicpetmrimaging
AT ruhlmannverena impactofrespiratorymotioncorrectiononlesionvisibilityandquantificationinthoracicpetmrimaging
AT umutlulale impactofrespiratorymotioncorrectiononlesionvisibilityandquantificationinthoracicpetmrimaging
AT fenchelmatthias impactofrespiratorymotioncorrectiononlesionvisibilityandquantificationinthoracicpetmrimaging
AT honginki impactofrespiratorymotioncorrectiononlesionvisibilityandquantificationinthoracicpetmrimaging
AT quickharaldh impactofrespiratorymotioncorrectiononlesionvisibilityandquantificationinthoracicpetmrimaging