Cargando…

Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION: Refractory shockable rhythm has a high mortality rate and poor neurological outcome. Treatments for refractory shockable rhythm presenting after defibrillation and medical treatment are not definite. We conducted research on the application of double simultaneous defibrillation (DSiD)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hee Eun, Lee, Kui Ja, Jo, You Hwan, Lee, Jae Hyuk, Kim, Yu Jin, Kim, Joong Hee, Lee, Dong Keon, Kim, Dong Won, Park, Seung Min, Oh, Young Taeck
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7273448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5470912
_version_ 1783542407091978240
author Kim, Hee Eun
Lee, Kui Ja
Jo, You Hwan
Lee, Jae Hyuk
Kim, Yu Jin
Kim, Joong Hee
Lee, Dong Keon
Kim, Dong Won
Park, Seung Min
Oh, Young Taeck
author_facet Kim, Hee Eun
Lee, Kui Ja
Jo, You Hwan
Lee, Jae Hyuk
Kim, Yu Jin
Kim, Joong Hee
Lee, Dong Keon
Kim, Dong Won
Park, Seung Min
Oh, Young Taeck
author_sort Kim, Hee Eun
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Refractory shockable rhythm has a high mortality rate and poor neurological outcome. Treatments for refractory shockable rhythm presenting after defibrillation and medical treatment are not definite. We conducted research on the application of double simultaneous defibrillation (DSiD) for refractory shockable rhythms. METHODS: This is a retrospective pilot study performed using medical records from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. The prephase was from January to December 2016. The post-phase was from January to December 2017. During the prephase, we conducted conventional defibrillation with one defibrillator, and during the post-phase, we conducted DSiD using two defibrillators. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included survival to hospital admission and good neurological outcome at 12 months. Statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher's exact test. Data were regarded statistically significant when p < 0.05. RESULT: A total of 38 patients were included. Twenty-one patients underwent conventional defibrillation, and 17 underwent DSiD. The DSiD group had a higher survival to admission rate (14/17 (82.4%) vs. 6/21 (28.6%), p=0.001) and showed a trend for higher survival to discharge (7/17 (41.2%) vs. 3/21 (14.3%), p=0.078). Good neurological outcome at 12 months of the DSiD group was higher than that of the conventional defibrillation group, but the difference was not statistically significant (5/17 (29.4%) vs 2/21 (9.5%), p=0.207). CONCLUSION: In patients with refractory shockable rhythms, DSiD has increased survival to hospital admission and a trend of increased survival to hospital discharge. However, DSiD did not improve neurological outcome at 12 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7273448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72734482020-06-18 Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study Kim, Hee Eun Lee, Kui Ja Jo, You Hwan Lee, Jae Hyuk Kim, Yu Jin Kim, Joong Hee Lee, Dong Keon Kim, Dong Won Park, Seung Min Oh, Young Taeck Emerg Med Int Research Article INTRODUCTION: Refractory shockable rhythm has a high mortality rate and poor neurological outcome. Treatments for refractory shockable rhythm presenting after defibrillation and medical treatment are not definite. We conducted research on the application of double simultaneous defibrillation (DSiD) for refractory shockable rhythms. METHODS: This is a retrospective pilot study performed using medical records from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. The prephase was from January to December 2016. The post-phase was from January to December 2017. During the prephase, we conducted conventional defibrillation with one defibrillator, and during the post-phase, we conducted DSiD using two defibrillators. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included survival to hospital admission and good neurological outcome at 12 months. Statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher's exact test. Data were regarded statistically significant when p < 0.05. RESULT: A total of 38 patients were included. Twenty-one patients underwent conventional defibrillation, and 17 underwent DSiD. The DSiD group had a higher survival to admission rate (14/17 (82.4%) vs. 6/21 (28.6%), p=0.001) and showed a trend for higher survival to discharge (7/17 (41.2%) vs. 3/21 (14.3%), p=0.078). Good neurological outcome at 12 months of the DSiD group was higher than that of the conventional defibrillation group, but the difference was not statistically significant (5/17 (29.4%) vs 2/21 (9.5%), p=0.207). CONCLUSION: In patients with refractory shockable rhythms, DSiD has increased survival to hospital admission and a trend of increased survival to hospital discharge. However, DSiD did not improve neurological outcome at 12 months. Hindawi 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7273448/ /pubmed/32566304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5470912 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hee Eun Kim et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Hee Eun
Lee, Kui Ja
Jo, You Hwan
Lee, Jae Hyuk
Kim, Yu Jin
Kim, Joong Hee
Lee, Dong Keon
Kim, Dong Won
Park, Seung Min
Oh, Young Taeck
Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study
title Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study
title_full Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study
title_fullStr Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study
title_short Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study
title_sort refractory ventricular fibrillation treated with double simultaneous defibrillation: pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7273448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5470912
work_keys_str_mv AT kimheeeun refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy
AT leekuija refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy
AT joyouhwan refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy
AT leejaehyuk refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy
AT kimyujin refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy
AT kimjoonghee refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy
AT leedongkeon refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy
AT kimdongwon refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy
AT parkseungmin refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy
AT ohyoungtaeck refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy