Cargando…
Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study
INTRODUCTION: Refractory shockable rhythm has a high mortality rate and poor neurological outcome. Treatments for refractory shockable rhythm presenting after defibrillation and medical treatment are not definite. We conducted research on the application of double simultaneous defibrillation (DSiD)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7273448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5470912 |
_version_ | 1783542407091978240 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Hee Eun Lee, Kui Ja Jo, You Hwan Lee, Jae Hyuk Kim, Yu Jin Kim, Joong Hee Lee, Dong Keon Kim, Dong Won Park, Seung Min Oh, Young Taeck |
author_facet | Kim, Hee Eun Lee, Kui Ja Jo, You Hwan Lee, Jae Hyuk Kim, Yu Jin Kim, Joong Hee Lee, Dong Keon Kim, Dong Won Park, Seung Min Oh, Young Taeck |
author_sort | Kim, Hee Eun |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Refractory shockable rhythm has a high mortality rate and poor neurological outcome. Treatments for refractory shockable rhythm presenting after defibrillation and medical treatment are not definite. We conducted research on the application of double simultaneous defibrillation (DSiD) for refractory shockable rhythms. METHODS: This is a retrospective pilot study performed using medical records from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. The prephase was from January to December 2016. The post-phase was from January to December 2017. During the prephase, we conducted conventional defibrillation with one defibrillator, and during the post-phase, we conducted DSiD using two defibrillators. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included survival to hospital admission and good neurological outcome at 12 months. Statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher's exact test. Data were regarded statistically significant when p < 0.05. RESULT: A total of 38 patients were included. Twenty-one patients underwent conventional defibrillation, and 17 underwent DSiD. The DSiD group had a higher survival to admission rate (14/17 (82.4%) vs. 6/21 (28.6%), p=0.001) and showed a trend for higher survival to discharge (7/17 (41.2%) vs. 3/21 (14.3%), p=0.078). Good neurological outcome at 12 months of the DSiD group was higher than that of the conventional defibrillation group, but the difference was not statistically significant (5/17 (29.4%) vs 2/21 (9.5%), p=0.207). CONCLUSION: In patients with refractory shockable rhythms, DSiD has increased survival to hospital admission and a trend of increased survival to hospital discharge. However, DSiD did not improve neurological outcome at 12 months. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7273448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72734482020-06-18 Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study Kim, Hee Eun Lee, Kui Ja Jo, You Hwan Lee, Jae Hyuk Kim, Yu Jin Kim, Joong Hee Lee, Dong Keon Kim, Dong Won Park, Seung Min Oh, Young Taeck Emerg Med Int Research Article INTRODUCTION: Refractory shockable rhythm has a high mortality rate and poor neurological outcome. Treatments for refractory shockable rhythm presenting after defibrillation and medical treatment are not definite. We conducted research on the application of double simultaneous defibrillation (DSiD) for refractory shockable rhythms. METHODS: This is a retrospective pilot study performed using medical records from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. The prephase was from January to December 2016. The post-phase was from January to December 2017. During the prephase, we conducted conventional defibrillation with one defibrillator, and during the post-phase, we conducted DSiD using two defibrillators. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included survival to hospital admission and good neurological outcome at 12 months. Statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher's exact test. Data were regarded statistically significant when p < 0.05. RESULT: A total of 38 patients were included. Twenty-one patients underwent conventional defibrillation, and 17 underwent DSiD. The DSiD group had a higher survival to admission rate (14/17 (82.4%) vs. 6/21 (28.6%), p=0.001) and showed a trend for higher survival to discharge (7/17 (41.2%) vs. 3/21 (14.3%), p=0.078). Good neurological outcome at 12 months of the DSiD group was higher than that of the conventional defibrillation group, but the difference was not statistically significant (5/17 (29.4%) vs 2/21 (9.5%), p=0.207). CONCLUSION: In patients with refractory shockable rhythms, DSiD has increased survival to hospital admission and a trend of increased survival to hospital discharge. However, DSiD did not improve neurological outcome at 12 months. Hindawi 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7273448/ /pubmed/32566304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5470912 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hee Eun Kim et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kim, Hee Eun Lee, Kui Ja Jo, You Hwan Lee, Jae Hyuk Kim, Yu Jin Kim, Joong Hee Lee, Dong Keon Kim, Dong Won Park, Seung Min Oh, Young Taeck Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study |
title | Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study |
title_full | Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study |
title_short | Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study |
title_sort | refractory ventricular fibrillation treated with double simultaneous defibrillation: pilot study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7273448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5470912 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimheeeun refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy AT leekuija refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy AT joyouhwan refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy AT leejaehyuk refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy AT kimyujin refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy AT kimjoonghee refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy AT leedongkeon refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy AT kimdongwon refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy AT parkseungmin refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy AT ohyoungtaeck refractoryventricularfibrillationtreatedwithdoublesimultaneousdefibrillationpilotstudy |