Cargando…

Post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in single‐stage endoscopic common bile duct stone removal

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Papillary treatment, such as endoscopic sphincterotomy or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation, and subsequent single‐stage endoscopic stone removal are often performed for choledocholithiasis; however, the incidence of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancrea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saito, Hirokazu, Koga, Takehiko, Sakaguchi, Masafumi, Kadono, Yoshihiro, Kamikawa, Kentaro, Urata, Atsushi, Imamura, Haruo, Tada, Shuji, Kakuma, Tatsuyuki, Matsushita, Ikuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7273691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32514443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12263
_version_ 1783542454975201280
author Saito, Hirokazu
Koga, Takehiko
Sakaguchi, Masafumi
Kadono, Yoshihiro
Kamikawa, Kentaro
Urata, Atsushi
Imamura, Haruo
Tada, Shuji
Kakuma, Tatsuyuki
Matsushita, Ikuo
author_facet Saito, Hirokazu
Koga, Takehiko
Sakaguchi, Masafumi
Kadono, Yoshihiro
Kamikawa, Kentaro
Urata, Atsushi
Imamura, Haruo
Tada, Shuji
Kakuma, Tatsuyuki
Matsushita, Ikuo
author_sort Saito, Hirokazu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Papillary treatment, such as endoscopic sphincterotomy or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation, and subsequent single‐stage endoscopic stone removal are often performed for choledocholithiasis; however, the incidence of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is unclear. This study aimed to compare the overall incidence of PEP between single‐ and two‐stage stone removal groups and the incidence of PEP between these two groups based on cannulation time. METHODS: We included 897 patients with native papilla who underwent papillary treatment and stone removal for choledocholithiasis with no inflammation or mild‐to‐moderate acute cholangitis at three institutions between April 2012 and March 2018 in Japan. We performed a propensity‐matched analysis and regression adjustment by propensity score to adjust for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: In the propensity‐matched analysis with 234 pairs, there was no significant difference in the overall incidence of PEP between single‐ and two‐stage stone removal procedures (15/234, 6.4% vs 6/234, 2.6%, P = 0.072, respectively). Although single‐stage stone removal after a cannulation time of ≤15 min was not a significant risk factor of PEP, the procedure after a cannulation time of >15 min was a significant risk factor of PEP as estimated by regression adjustment by propensity score (P = 0.014, 95% CI = 1.4–19.4, odds ratio = 5.2). CONCLUSIONS: Single‐stage endoscopic stone removal after a long cannulation time of >15 min increased the incidence of PEP compared with the two‐stage stone removal procedure. Thus, single‐stage stone removal should be performed in patients with a cannulation time ≤ 15 min.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7273691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72736912020-06-07 Post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in single‐stage endoscopic common bile duct stone removal Saito, Hirokazu Koga, Takehiko Sakaguchi, Masafumi Kadono, Yoshihiro Kamikawa, Kentaro Urata, Atsushi Imamura, Haruo Tada, Shuji Kakuma, Tatsuyuki Matsushita, Ikuo JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Papillary treatment, such as endoscopic sphincterotomy or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation, and subsequent single‐stage endoscopic stone removal are often performed for choledocholithiasis; however, the incidence of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is unclear. This study aimed to compare the overall incidence of PEP between single‐ and two‐stage stone removal groups and the incidence of PEP between these two groups based on cannulation time. METHODS: We included 897 patients with native papilla who underwent papillary treatment and stone removal for choledocholithiasis with no inflammation or mild‐to‐moderate acute cholangitis at three institutions between April 2012 and March 2018 in Japan. We performed a propensity‐matched analysis and regression adjustment by propensity score to adjust for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: In the propensity‐matched analysis with 234 pairs, there was no significant difference in the overall incidence of PEP between single‐ and two‐stage stone removal procedures (15/234, 6.4% vs 6/234, 2.6%, P = 0.072, respectively). Although single‐stage stone removal after a cannulation time of ≤15 min was not a significant risk factor of PEP, the procedure after a cannulation time of >15 min was a significant risk factor of PEP as estimated by regression adjustment by propensity score (P = 0.014, 95% CI = 1.4–19.4, odds ratio = 5.2). CONCLUSIONS: Single‐stage endoscopic stone removal after a long cannulation time of >15 min increased the incidence of PEP compared with the two‐stage stone removal procedure. Thus, single‐stage stone removal should be performed in patients with a cannulation time ≤ 15 min. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7273691/ /pubmed/32514443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12263 Text en © 2019 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Saito, Hirokazu
Koga, Takehiko
Sakaguchi, Masafumi
Kadono, Yoshihiro
Kamikawa, Kentaro
Urata, Atsushi
Imamura, Haruo
Tada, Shuji
Kakuma, Tatsuyuki
Matsushita, Ikuo
Post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in single‐stage endoscopic common bile duct stone removal
title Post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in single‐stage endoscopic common bile duct stone removal
title_full Post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in single‐stage endoscopic common bile duct stone removal
title_fullStr Post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in single‐stage endoscopic common bile duct stone removal
title_full_unstemmed Post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in single‐stage endoscopic common bile duct stone removal
title_short Post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in single‐stage endoscopic common bile duct stone removal
title_sort post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in single‐stage endoscopic common bile duct stone removal
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7273691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32514443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12263
work_keys_str_mv AT saitohirokazu postendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisinsinglestageendoscopiccommonbileductstoneremoval
AT kogatakehiko postendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisinsinglestageendoscopiccommonbileductstoneremoval
AT sakaguchimasafumi postendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisinsinglestageendoscopiccommonbileductstoneremoval
AT kadonoyoshihiro postendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisinsinglestageendoscopiccommonbileductstoneremoval
AT kamikawakentaro postendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisinsinglestageendoscopiccommonbileductstoneremoval
AT urataatsushi postendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisinsinglestageendoscopiccommonbileductstoneremoval
AT imamuraharuo postendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisinsinglestageendoscopiccommonbileductstoneremoval
AT tadashuji postendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisinsinglestageendoscopiccommonbileductstoneremoval
AT kakumatatsuyuki postendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisinsinglestageendoscopiccommonbileductstoneremoval
AT matsushitaikuo postendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisinsinglestageendoscopiccommonbileductstoneremoval