Cargando…

A Comparative Analysis of Ash Leaf-Colonizing Bacterial Communities Identifies Putative Antagonists of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus

In the last few years, the alarming spread of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, the causal agent of ash dieback, has resulted in a substantial threat to native ash stands in central and northern Europe. Since leaves and leaf petioles are the primary infection sites, phyllosphere microorganisms are presumed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ulrich, Kristina, Becker, Regina, Behrendt, Undine, Kube, Michael, Ulrich, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7273808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00966
_version_ 1783542478618492928
author Ulrich, Kristina
Becker, Regina
Behrendt, Undine
Kube, Michael
Ulrich, Andreas
author_facet Ulrich, Kristina
Becker, Regina
Behrendt, Undine
Kube, Michael
Ulrich, Andreas
author_sort Ulrich, Kristina
collection PubMed
description In the last few years, the alarming spread of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, the causal agent of ash dieback, has resulted in a substantial threat to native ash stands in central and northern Europe. Since leaves and leaf petioles are the primary infection sites, phyllosphere microorganisms are presumed to interact with the pathogen and are discussed as a source of biocontrol agents. We studied compound leaves from susceptible and visible infection-free trees in four ash stands with a high likelihood of infection to assess a possible variation in the bacterial microbiota, depending on the health status of the trees. The bacterial community was analyzed by culture-independent 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and through the isolation and taxonomic classification of 2,589 isolates using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The bacterial community structure did not show significant differences. However, a set of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and MALDI groups belonging to Luteimonas, Aureimonas, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Paenibacillus were distinctly increased in tolerant trees, which may be associated with the ability of the tree to resist the pathogen. The most obvious differences were observed for Luteimonas, a genus that is also exclusively present in the healthy core microbiome. In a first in vitro screen of antagonists, approximately 11% of total isolates suppressed the growth of H. fraxineus, but a statistical test with two different H. fraxineus strains confirmed only the antagonistic activity of 8% of these isolates. The antagonistic isolates were assigned to Bacillus velezensis, Pantoea vagans, and Pseudomonas caspiana. Overall, our study provides a set of isolates or phylogenetic groups that might be involved in the process that prevents the penetration and spread of H. fraxineus. In the next step, in planta experiments are required with a longer period of exposure to H. fraxineus to evaluate effective isolates or consortia of isolates acting through direct antagonism or competition or indirectly by inducing resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7273808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72738082020-06-15 A Comparative Analysis of Ash Leaf-Colonizing Bacterial Communities Identifies Putative Antagonists of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus Ulrich, Kristina Becker, Regina Behrendt, Undine Kube, Michael Ulrich, Andreas Front Microbiol Microbiology In the last few years, the alarming spread of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, the causal agent of ash dieback, has resulted in a substantial threat to native ash stands in central and northern Europe. Since leaves and leaf petioles are the primary infection sites, phyllosphere microorganisms are presumed to interact with the pathogen and are discussed as a source of biocontrol agents. We studied compound leaves from susceptible and visible infection-free trees in four ash stands with a high likelihood of infection to assess a possible variation in the bacterial microbiota, depending on the health status of the trees. The bacterial community was analyzed by culture-independent 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and through the isolation and taxonomic classification of 2,589 isolates using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The bacterial community structure did not show significant differences. However, a set of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and MALDI groups belonging to Luteimonas, Aureimonas, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Paenibacillus were distinctly increased in tolerant trees, which may be associated with the ability of the tree to resist the pathogen. The most obvious differences were observed for Luteimonas, a genus that is also exclusively present in the healthy core microbiome. In a first in vitro screen of antagonists, approximately 11% of total isolates suppressed the growth of H. fraxineus, but a statistical test with two different H. fraxineus strains confirmed only the antagonistic activity of 8% of these isolates. The antagonistic isolates were assigned to Bacillus velezensis, Pantoea vagans, and Pseudomonas caspiana. Overall, our study provides a set of isolates or phylogenetic groups that might be involved in the process that prevents the penetration and spread of H. fraxineus. In the next step, in planta experiments are required with a longer period of exposure to H. fraxineus to evaluate effective isolates or consortia of isolates acting through direct antagonism or competition or indirectly by inducing resistance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7273808/ /pubmed/32547506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00966 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ulrich, Becker, Behrendt, Kube and Ulrich. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Ulrich, Kristina
Becker, Regina
Behrendt, Undine
Kube, Michael
Ulrich, Andreas
A Comparative Analysis of Ash Leaf-Colonizing Bacterial Communities Identifies Putative Antagonists of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus
title A Comparative Analysis of Ash Leaf-Colonizing Bacterial Communities Identifies Putative Antagonists of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus
title_full A Comparative Analysis of Ash Leaf-Colonizing Bacterial Communities Identifies Putative Antagonists of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus
title_fullStr A Comparative Analysis of Ash Leaf-Colonizing Bacterial Communities Identifies Putative Antagonists of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Analysis of Ash Leaf-Colonizing Bacterial Communities Identifies Putative Antagonists of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus
title_short A Comparative Analysis of Ash Leaf-Colonizing Bacterial Communities Identifies Putative Antagonists of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus
title_sort comparative analysis of ash leaf-colonizing bacterial communities identifies putative antagonists of hymenoscyphus fraxineus
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7273808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00966
work_keys_str_mv AT ulrichkristina acomparativeanalysisofashleafcolonizingbacterialcommunitiesidentifiesputativeantagonistsofhymenoscyphusfraxineus
AT beckerregina acomparativeanalysisofashleafcolonizingbacterialcommunitiesidentifiesputativeantagonistsofhymenoscyphusfraxineus
AT behrendtundine acomparativeanalysisofashleafcolonizingbacterialcommunitiesidentifiesputativeantagonistsofhymenoscyphusfraxineus
AT kubemichael acomparativeanalysisofashleafcolonizingbacterialcommunitiesidentifiesputativeantagonistsofhymenoscyphusfraxineus
AT ulrichandreas acomparativeanalysisofashleafcolonizingbacterialcommunitiesidentifiesputativeantagonistsofhymenoscyphusfraxineus
AT ulrichkristina comparativeanalysisofashleafcolonizingbacterialcommunitiesidentifiesputativeantagonistsofhymenoscyphusfraxineus
AT beckerregina comparativeanalysisofashleafcolonizingbacterialcommunitiesidentifiesputativeantagonistsofhymenoscyphusfraxineus
AT behrendtundine comparativeanalysisofashleafcolonizingbacterialcommunitiesidentifiesputativeantagonistsofhymenoscyphusfraxineus
AT kubemichael comparativeanalysisofashleafcolonizingbacterialcommunitiesidentifiesputativeantagonistsofhymenoscyphusfraxineus
AT ulrichandreas comparativeanalysisofashleafcolonizingbacterialcommunitiesidentifiesputativeantagonistsofhymenoscyphusfraxineus