Cargando…

Validation of the concavity–convexity quotient as a new method to measure the magnitude of scoliosis

OBJECTIVES: We propose a novel and simple method to determine the magnitude of the curve in scoliosis and its correlation with the Cobb angle. METHODS: Using multiple rounds of nominal group technique and an established consensus-building methodology, a multidisciplinary research group identified a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mariscal, Gonzalo, Nuñez, Jorge H., Figueira, Paulo, Malo, Ana, Montiel, Verónica, López, Miguel A., Castro, Miguel, Barrios, Carlos, Fern, Pedro Domenech
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32549710
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_22_20
_version_ 1783542566051905536
author Mariscal, Gonzalo
Nuñez, Jorge H.
Figueira, Paulo
Malo, Ana
Montiel, Verónica
López, Miguel A.
Castro, Miguel
Barrios, Carlos
Fern, Pedro Domenech
author_facet Mariscal, Gonzalo
Nuñez, Jorge H.
Figueira, Paulo
Malo, Ana
Montiel, Verónica
López, Miguel A.
Castro, Miguel
Barrios, Carlos
Fern, Pedro Domenech
author_sort Mariscal, Gonzalo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We propose a novel and simple method to determine the magnitude of the curve in scoliosis and its correlation with the Cobb angle. METHODS: Using multiple rounds of nominal group technique and an established consensus-building methodology, a multidisciplinary research group identified a simple method to value the curve deformity based on the vertebral pedicles. MEASUREMENTS: A mathematical study was performed to determine the relationship between the Cobb angle and the concavity–convexity quotient (CCQ). To evaluate the clinical correlation between the Cobb angle and CCQ, spine surgeons measured 48 curves (before and after follow-up) of congenital scoliosis. RESULTS: This quotient reflects the ratio between the distance from the upper end of the most inclined upper vertebra to the lower end of the most inclined lower vertebra on the concave side (A-distance) and the corresponding distance on the convex side of the curve (B-distance). The existing mathematical relationship is based on changing the explicit coordinates to polar coordinates. Finally, the clinical correlation between the Cobb angle and CCQ was statistically significant (r = −0.688; P < 0.001 in first measure and r = −0.789; P < 0.001 in the second measure). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides Level III evidence that CCQ represents a promising alternative or a complementary method to the traditional Cobb angle due to its simple and reliable ability to measure the magnitude of the curve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7274366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72743662020-06-16 Validation of the concavity–convexity quotient as a new method to measure the magnitude of scoliosis Mariscal, Gonzalo Nuñez, Jorge H. Figueira, Paulo Malo, Ana Montiel, Verónica López, Miguel A. Castro, Miguel Barrios, Carlos Fern, Pedro Domenech J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article OBJECTIVES: We propose a novel and simple method to determine the magnitude of the curve in scoliosis and its correlation with the Cobb angle. METHODS: Using multiple rounds of nominal group technique and an established consensus-building methodology, a multidisciplinary research group identified a simple method to value the curve deformity based on the vertebral pedicles. MEASUREMENTS: A mathematical study was performed to determine the relationship between the Cobb angle and the concavity–convexity quotient (CCQ). To evaluate the clinical correlation between the Cobb angle and CCQ, spine surgeons measured 48 curves (before and after follow-up) of congenital scoliosis. RESULTS: This quotient reflects the ratio between the distance from the upper end of the most inclined upper vertebra to the lower end of the most inclined lower vertebra on the concave side (A-distance) and the corresponding distance on the convex side of the curve (B-distance). The existing mathematical relationship is based on changing the explicit coordinates to polar coordinates. Finally, the clinical correlation between the Cobb angle and CCQ was statistically significant (r = −0.688; P < 0.001 in first measure and r = −0.789; P < 0.001 in the second measure). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides Level III evidence that CCQ represents a promising alternative or a complementary method to the traditional Cobb angle due to its simple and reliable ability to measure the magnitude of the curve. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7274366/ /pubmed/32549710 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_22_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mariscal, Gonzalo
Nuñez, Jorge H.
Figueira, Paulo
Malo, Ana
Montiel, Verónica
López, Miguel A.
Castro, Miguel
Barrios, Carlos
Fern, Pedro Domenech
Validation of the concavity–convexity quotient as a new method to measure the magnitude of scoliosis
title Validation of the concavity–convexity quotient as a new method to measure the magnitude of scoliosis
title_full Validation of the concavity–convexity quotient as a new method to measure the magnitude of scoliosis
title_fullStr Validation of the concavity–convexity quotient as a new method to measure the magnitude of scoliosis
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the concavity–convexity quotient as a new method to measure the magnitude of scoliosis
title_short Validation of the concavity–convexity quotient as a new method to measure the magnitude of scoliosis
title_sort validation of the concavity–convexity quotient as a new method to measure the magnitude of scoliosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32549710
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_22_20
work_keys_str_mv AT mariscalgonzalo validationoftheconcavityconvexityquotientasanewmethodtomeasurethemagnitudeofscoliosis
AT nunezjorgeh validationoftheconcavityconvexityquotientasanewmethodtomeasurethemagnitudeofscoliosis
AT figueirapaulo validationoftheconcavityconvexityquotientasanewmethodtomeasurethemagnitudeofscoliosis
AT maloana validationoftheconcavityconvexityquotientasanewmethodtomeasurethemagnitudeofscoliosis
AT montielveronica validationoftheconcavityconvexityquotientasanewmethodtomeasurethemagnitudeofscoliosis
AT lopezmiguela validationoftheconcavityconvexityquotientasanewmethodtomeasurethemagnitudeofscoliosis
AT castromiguel validationoftheconcavityconvexityquotientasanewmethodtomeasurethemagnitudeofscoliosis
AT barrioscarlos validationoftheconcavityconvexityquotientasanewmethodtomeasurethemagnitudeofscoliosis
AT fernpedrodomenech validationoftheconcavityconvexityquotientasanewmethodtomeasurethemagnitudeofscoliosis