Cargando…

Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients

OBJECTIVE: The authors analyze the rationale of atlantoaxial fixation in patients presenting with symptoms related to cervical myelopathy and wherein the radiological images depicted C2–3 fusion and presence of single or multiple level neural compression of the subaxial cervical spinal cord attribut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goel, Atul, Jadhav, Dikpal, Shah, Abhidha, Rai, Survendra, Dandpat, Saswat, Jadhav, Neha, Vaja, Tejas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32549712
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_25_20
_version_ 1783542566298320896
author Goel, Atul
Jadhav, Dikpal
Shah, Abhidha
Rai, Survendra
Dandpat, Saswat
Jadhav, Neha
Vaja, Tejas
author_facet Goel, Atul
Jadhav, Dikpal
Shah, Abhidha
Rai, Survendra
Dandpat, Saswat
Jadhav, Neha
Vaja, Tejas
author_sort Goel, Atul
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The authors analyze the rationale of atlantoaxial fixation in patients presenting with symptoms related to cervical myelopathy and wherein the radiological images depicted C2–3 fusion and presence of single or multiple level neural compression of the subaxial cervical spinal cord attributed to “degenerative” spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven adult males were analyzed who presented with long-standing symptoms of progressive cervical myelopathy and where imaging showed presence of C2–3 fusion, no cord compression related to odontoid process, and evidence of single or multiple level lower cervical cord compression conventionally attributed to spinal degeneration. There was no other bone or soft tissue abnormality at the craniovertebral junction. There was no evidence of atlantoaxial instability when assessed by conventional radiological diagnostic parameters. Atlantoaxial instability was diagnosed on the basis of clinical understanding, atlantoaxial facetal malalignment, and manual assessment of instability by bone handling during surgery. All the seven patients underwent atlantoaxial fixation and no surgical manipulation at lower cervical spinal levels. RESULTS: At an average follow-up of 34 months, all patients have recovered satisfactorily in their neurological function. CONCLUSION: The presence of C2–3 fusion is an indication of atlantoaxial instability and suggests the need for atlantoaxial stabilization. Effects on the subaxial spine and spinal cord are secondary events and may not be surgically addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7274367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72743672020-06-16 Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients Goel, Atul Jadhav, Dikpal Shah, Abhidha Rai, Survendra Dandpat, Saswat Jadhav, Neha Vaja, Tejas J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article OBJECTIVE: The authors analyze the rationale of atlantoaxial fixation in patients presenting with symptoms related to cervical myelopathy and wherein the radiological images depicted C2–3 fusion and presence of single or multiple level neural compression of the subaxial cervical spinal cord attributed to “degenerative” spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven adult males were analyzed who presented with long-standing symptoms of progressive cervical myelopathy and where imaging showed presence of C2–3 fusion, no cord compression related to odontoid process, and evidence of single or multiple level lower cervical cord compression conventionally attributed to spinal degeneration. There was no other bone or soft tissue abnormality at the craniovertebral junction. There was no evidence of atlantoaxial instability when assessed by conventional radiological diagnostic parameters. Atlantoaxial instability was diagnosed on the basis of clinical understanding, atlantoaxial facetal malalignment, and manual assessment of instability by bone handling during surgery. All the seven patients underwent atlantoaxial fixation and no surgical manipulation at lower cervical spinal levels. RESULTS: At an average follow-up of 34 months, all patients have recovered satisfactorily in their neurological function. CONCLUSION: The presence of C2–3 fusion is an indication of atlantoaxial instability and suggests the need for atlantoaxial stabilization. Effects on the subaxial spine and spinal cord are secondary events and may not be surgically addressed. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7274367/ /pubmed/32549712 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_25_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Goel, Atul
Jadhav, Dikpal
Shah, Abhidha
Rai, Survendra
Dandpat, Saswat
Jadhav, Neha
Vaja, Tejas
Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
title Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
title_full Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
title_fullStr Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
title_full_unstemmed Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
title_short Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
title_sort is c2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? an analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32549712
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_25_20
work_keys_str_mv AT goelatul isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients
AT jadhavdikpal isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients
AT shahabhidha isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients
AT raisurvendra isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients
AT dandpatsaswat isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients
AT jadhavneha isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients
AT vajatejas isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients