Cargando…

Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward

The neurobiological study of reward was launched by the discovery of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS). Subsequent investigation of this phenomenon provided the initial link between reward-seeking behavior and dopaminergic neurotransmission. We re-evaluated this relationship by psychophysical, ph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan, Conover, Kent, Solis, Pavel, Palacios, Daniel, Shizgal, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32502210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226722
_version_ 1783542576775692288
author Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan
Conover, Kent
Solis, Pavel
Palacios, Daniel
Shizgal, Peter
author_facet Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan
Conover, Kent
Solis, Pavel
Palacios, Daniel
Shizgal, Peter
author_sort Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan
collection PubMed
description The neurobiological study of reward was launched by the discovery of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS). Subsequent investigation of this phenomenon provided the initial link between reward-seeking behavior and dopaminergic neurotransmission. We re-evaluated this relationship by psychophysical, pharmacological, optogenetic, and computational means. In rats working for direct, optical activation of midbrain dopamine neurons, we varied the strength and opportunity cost of the stimulation and measured time allocation, the proportion of trial time devoted to reward pursuit. We found that the dependence of time allocation on the strength and cost of stimulation was similar formally to that observed when electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle served as the reward. When the stimulation is strong and cheap, the rats devote almost all their time to reward pursuit; time allocation falls off as stimulation strength is decreased and/or its opportunity cost is increased. A 3D plot of time allocation versus stimulation strength and cost produces a surface resembling the corner of a plateau (the “reward mountain”). We show that dopamine-transporter blockade shifts the mountain along both the strength and cost axes in rats working for optical activation of midbrain dopamine neurons. In contrast, the same drug shifted the mountain uniquely along the opportunity-cost axis when rats worked for electrical MFB stimulation in a prior study. Dopamine neurons are an obligatory stage in the dominant model of ICSS, which positions them at a key nexus in the final common path for reward seeking. This model fails to provide a cogent account for the differential effect of dopamine transporter blockade on the reward mountain. Instead, we propose that midbrain dopamine neurons and neurons with non-dopaminergic, MFB axons constitute parallel limbs of brain-reward circuitry that ultimately converge on the final-common path for the evaluation and pursuit of rewards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7274413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72744132020-06-09 Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan Conover, Kent Solis, Pavel Palacios, Daniel Shizgal, Peter PLoS One Research Article The neurobiological study of reward was launched by the discovery of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS). Subsequent investigation of this phenomenon provided the initial link between reward-seeking behavior and dopaminergic neurotransmission. We re-evaluated this relationship by psychophysical, pharmacological, optogenetic, and computational means. In rats working for direct, optical activation of midbrain dopamine neurons, we varied the strength and opportunity cost of the stimulation and measured time allocation, the proportion of trial time devoted to reward pursuit. We found that the dependence of time allocation on the strength and cost of stimulation was similar formally to that observed when electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle served as the reward. When the stimulation is strong and cheap, the rats devote almost all their time to reward pursuit; time allocation falls off as stimulation strength is decreased and/or its opportunity cost is increased. A 3D plot of time allocation versus stimulation strength and cost produces a surface resembling the corner of a plateau (the “reward mountain”). We show that dopamine-transporter blockade shifts the mountain along both the strength and cost axes in rats working for optical activation of midbrain dopamine neurons. In contrast, the same drug shifted the mountain uniquely along the opportunity-cost axis when rats worked for electrical MFB stimulation in a prior study. Dopamine neurons are an obligatory stage in the dominant model of ICSS, which positions them at a key nexus in the final common path for reward seeking. This model fails to provide a cogent account for the differential effect of dopamine transporter blockade on the reward mountain. Instead, we propose that midbrain dopamine neurons and neurons with non-dopaminergic, MFB axons constitute parallel limbs of brain-reward circuitry that ultimately converge on the final-common path for the evaluation and pursuit of rewards. Public Library of Science 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7274413/ /pubmed/32502210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226722 Text en © 2020 Trujillo-Pisanty et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan
Conover, Kent
Solis, Pavel
Palacios, Daniel
Shizgal, Peter
Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward
title Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward
title_full Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward
title_fullStr Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward
title_full_unstemmed Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward
title_short Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward
title_sort dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32502210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226722
work_keys_str_mv AT trujillopisantyivan dopamineneuronsdonotconstituteanobligatorystageinthefinalcommonpathfortheevaluationandpursuitofbrainstimulationreward
AT conoverkent dopamineneuronsdonotconstituteanobligatorystageinthefinalcommonpathfortheevaluationandpursuitofbrainstimulationreward
AT solispavel dopamineneuronsdonotconstituteanobligatorystageinthefinalcommonpathfortheevaluationandpursuitofbrainstimulationreward
AT palaciosdaniel dopamineneuronsdonotconstituteanobligatorystageinthefinalcommonpathfortheevaluationandpursuitofbrainstimulationreward
AT shizgalpeter dopamineneuronsdonotconstituteanobligatorystageinthefinalcommonpathfortheevaluationandpursuitofbrainstimulationreward