Cargando…

Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy: A propensity score matched analysis

Although identified to be at a higher risk of relapse, no consensus exists on the treatment of breast cancer (BC) patients with no pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ) in this context has scarcely been studied. We evaluated t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labrosse, Julie, Osdoit, Marie, Hamy, Anne-Sophie, Coussy, Florence, Pierga, Jean-Yves, Reyal, Fabien, Laas, Enora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32502222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234173
_version_ 1783542584856018944
author Labrosse, Julie
Osdoit, Marie
Hamy, Anne-Sophie
Coussy, Florence
Pierga, Jean-Yves
Reyal, Fabien
Laas, Enora
author_facet Labrosse, Julie
Osdoit, Marie
Hamy, Anne-Sophie
Coussy, Florence
Pierga, Jean-Yves
Reyal, Fabien
Laas, Enora
author_sort Labrosse, Julie
collection PubMed
description Although identified to be at a higher risk of relapse, no consensus exists on the treatment of breast cancer (BC) patients with no pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ) in this context has scarcely been studied. We evaluated the benefit of administrating adjuvant chemotherapy in a real life cohort of BC patients with invasive residual disease after NAC. 1199 female BC patients with T1-3NxM0 invasive tumors receiving NAC at Institut Curie from 2002 to 2012 were included in the analysis. 1061 had been treated by NAC only, whereas 138 had received additional adjuvant chemotherapy after NAC (FUN protocol: 5-FU-Vinorelbine). We compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates between patients having received NAC only and patients having received NAC+ADJ. To ensure comparability of our populations, we used a propensity score (which defines the probability of treatment assignment conditional on observed baseline covariates) and matched each patient having received NAC+ADJ (n = 138) with a patient having received NAC only that had a similar propensity score value. Before propensity score matching, DFS and OS rates were significantly lower in the NAC+ADJ group compared to NAC only, after 3 years, 5 years and 10 years follow-up (p<0.01). After one-to-one PS matching, the two groups were comparable (n = 276 patients; 138 patients in each group). No significant difference was found regarding DFS (p = 0.87) or OS (p = 0.59) rates, neither in global population, nor by pathological subtype. Although our study did not show a benefit of administrating ADJ with FUN protocol (5-Florouracil- Vinorelbine) to BC patients with residual disease after NAC, further studies are warranted to determine the impact of other adjuvant regimens. Thereby, patients with little chance of responding to particular regimens could avoid the toxicity of futile therapy, and be study participants in evaluations of novel treatment strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7274443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72744432020-06-09 Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy: A propensity score matched analysis Labrosse, Julie Osdoit, Marie Hamy, Anne-Sophie Coussy, Florence Pierga, Jean-Yves Reyal, Fabien Laas, Enora PLoS One Research Article Although identified to be at a higher risk of relapse, no consensus exists on the treatment of breast cancer (BC) patients with no pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ) in this context has scarcely been studied. We evaluated the benefit of administrating adjuvant chemotherapy in a real life cohort of BC patients with invasive residual disease after NAC. 1199 female BC patients with T1-3NxM0 invasive tumors receiving NAC at Institut Curie from 2002 to 2012 were included in the analysis. 1061 had been treated by NAC only, whereas 138 had received additional adjuvant chemotherapy after NAC (FUN protocol: 5-FU-Vinorelbine). We compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates between patients having received NAC only and patients having received NAC+ADJ. To ensure comparability of our populations, we used a propensity score (which defines the probability of treatment assignment conditional on observed baseline covariates) and matched each patient having received NAC+ADJ (n = 138) with a patient having received NAC only that had a similar propensity score value. Before propensity score matching, DFS and OS rates were significantly lower in the NAC+ADJ group compared to NAC only, after 3 years, 5 years and 10 years follow-up (p<0.01). After one-to-one PS matching, the two groups were comparable (n = 276 patients; 138 patients in each group). No significant difference was found regarding DFS (p = 0.87) or OS (p = 0.59) rates, neither in global population, nor by pathological subtype. Although our study did not show a benefit of administrating ADJ with FUN protocol (5-Florouracil- Vinorelbine) to BC patients with residual disease after NAC, further studies are warranted to determine the impact of other adjuvant regimens. Thereby, patients with little chance of responding to particular regimens could avoid the toxicity of futile therapy, and be study participants in evaluations of novel treatment strategies. Public Library of Science 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7274443/ /pubmed/32502222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234173 Text en © 2020 Labrosse et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Labrosse, Julie
Osdoit, Marie
Hamy, Anne-Sophie
Coussy, Florence
Pierga, Jean-Yves
Reyal, Fabien
Laas, Enora
Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy: A propensity score matched analysis
title Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy: A propensity score matched analysis
title_full Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy: A propensity score matched analysis
title_fullStr Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy: A propensity score matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy: A propensity score matched analysis
title_short Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy: A propensity score matched analysis
title_sort adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy: a propensity score matched analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32502222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234173
work_keys_str_mv AT labrossejulie adjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancerafterpreoperativechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT osdoitmarie adjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancerafterpreoperativechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT hamyannesophie adjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancerafterpreoperativechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT coussyflorence adjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancerafterpreoperativechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT piergajeanyves adjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancerafterpreoperativechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT reyalfabien adjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancerafterpreoperativechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT laasenora adjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancerafterpreoperativechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysis