Cargando…

Performance of two serodiagnostic tests for loiasis in a Non-Endemic area

Loiasis, caused by the filarial nematode Loa loa, is endemic in Central and West Africa where about 10 million people are infected. There is a scarcity of convenient, commercial diagnostics for L. loa. Microscopy requires trained personnel and has low sensitivity, while the serodiagnosis is currentl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gobbi, Federico, Buonfrate, Dora, Boussinesq, Michel, Chesnais, Cedric B., Pion, Sebastien D., Silva, Ronaldo, Moro, Lucia, Rodari, Paola, Tamarozzi, Francesca, Biamonte, Marco, Bisoffi, Zeno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32453734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008187
_version_ 1783542590414520320
author Gobbi, Federico
Buonfrate, Dora
Boussinesq, Michel
Chesnais, Cedric B.
Pion, Sebastien D.
Silva, Ronaldo
Moro, Lucia
Rodari, Paola
Tamarozzi, Francesca
Biamonte, Marco
Bisoffi, Zeno
author_facet Gobbi, Federico
Buonfrate, Dora
Boussinesq, Michel
Chesnais, Cedric B.
Pion, Sebastien D.
Silva, Ronaldo
Moro, Lucia
Rodari, Paola
Tamarozzi, Francesca
Biamonte, Marco
Bisoffi, Zeno
author_sort Gobbi, Federico
collection PubMed
description Loiasis, caused by the filarial nematode Loa loa, is endemic in Central and West Africa where about 10 million people are infected. There is a scarcity of convenient, commercial diagnostics for L. loa. Microscopy requires trained personnel and has low sensitivity, while the serodiagnosis is currently not standardized. Individual case management is also important in non-endemic countries to treat migrants, expatriates and tourists. We retrospectively compared the performance of a Loa Antibody Rapid Test (RDT) and a commercial ELISA pan-filarial test on 170 patients, 65 with loiasis [8 with eyeworm, 29 with positive microfilaremia, 28 with neither microfilaremia nor history of eyeworm but eosinophilia and history of Calabar swelling (probable loiasis)], 95 with other common parasitic infections and no previous exposure to L. loa (37 with M. perstans, 1 with Brugia sp., 18 with strongyloidiasis, 20 with schistosomiasis, 5 with hookworm, 4 with Ascaris lumbricoides infection, 10 with hyper-reactive malarial splenomegaly), and 10 uninfected controls. The sensitivity of the RDT and of the ELISA were 93.8% (61/65) and 90.8% (59/65), respectively. For the RDT, most of the cross-reactions were observed in patients with M. perstans: 7/37 (18.9%), followed by 1/10 (10%) with hyper-reactive malarial splenomegaly and 1/20 (5%) with schistosomiasis. None of the 27 subjects infected with intestinal nematodes was found positive at this test. The ELISA is meant to be a pan-filarial assay, and reacted extensively with cases of M. perstans (95%), as expected, and also in 11/18 (61.1%) patients with strongyloidiasis and in 3/5 (60%) with hookworm infection. The RDT and the ELISA are both highly sensitive for the diagnosis of loiasis. The main difference lies in the extent of cross-reactivity with other parasites. Considering that the RDT is specifically meant for Loa loa infection, and its high sensitivity, this test could be a useful tool for the diagnosis of occult loiasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7274468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72744682020-06-16 Performance of two serodiagnostic tests for loiasis in a Non-Endemic area Gobbi, Federico Buonfrate, Dora Boussinesq, Michel Chesnais, Cedric B. Pion, Sebastien D. Silva, Ronaldo Moro, Lucia Rodari, Paola Tamarozzi, Francesca Biamonte, Marco Bisoffi, Zeno PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article Loiasis, caused by the filarial nematode Loa loa, is endemic in Central and West Africa where about 10 million people are infected. There is a scarcity of convenient, commercial diagnostics for L. loa. Microscopy requires trained personnel and has low sensitivity, while the serodiagnosis is currently not standardized. Individual case management is also important in non-endemic countries to treat migrants, expatriates and tourists. We retrospectively compared the performance of a Loa Antibody Rapid Test (RDT) and a commercial ELISA pan-filarial test on 170 patients, 65 with loiasis [8 with eyeworm, 29 with positive microfilaremia, 28 with neither microfilaremia nor history of eyeworm but eosinophilia and history of Calabar swelling (probable loiasis)], 95 with other common parasitic infections and no previous exposure to L. loa (37 with M. perstans, 1 with Brugia sp., 18 with strongyloidiasis, 20 with schistosomiasis, 5 with hookworm, 4 with Ascaris lumbricoides infection, 10 with hyper-reactive malarial splenomegaly), and 10 uninfected controls. The sensitivity of the RDT and of the ELISA were 93.8% (61/65) and 90.8% (59/65), respectively. For the RDT, most of the cross-reactions were observed in patients with M. perstans: 7/37 (18.9%), followed by 1/10 (10%) with hyper-reactive malarial splenomegaly and 1/20 (5%) with schistosomiasis. None of the 27 subjects infected with intestinal nematodes was found positive at this test. The ELISA is meant to be a pan-filarial assay, and reacted extensively with cases of M. perstans (95%), as expected, and also in 11/18 (61.1%) patients with strongyloidiasis and in 3/5 (60%) with hookworm infection. The RDT and the ELISA are both highly sensitive for the diagnosis of loiasis. The main difference lies in the extent of cross-reactivity with other parasites. Considering that the RDT is specifically meant for Loa loa infection, and its high sensitivity, this test could be a useful tool for the diagnosis of occult loiasis. Public Library of Science 2020-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7274468/ /pubmed/32453734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008187 Text en © 2020 Gobbi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gobbi, Federico
Buonfrate, Dora
Boussinesq, Michel
Chesnais, Cedric B.
Pion, Sebastien D.
Silva, Ronaldo
Moro, Lucia
Rodari, Paola
Tamarozzi, Francesca
Biamonte, Marco
Bisoffi, Zeno
Performance of two serodiagnostic tests for loiasis in a Non-Endemic area
title Performance of two serodiagnostic tests for loiasis in a Non-Endemic area
title_full Performance of two serodiagnostic tests for loiasis in a Non-Endemic area
title_fullStr Performance of two serodiagnostic tests for loiasis in a Non-Endemic area
title_full_unstemmed Performance of two serodiagnostic tests for loiasis in a Non-Endemic area
title_short Performance of two serodiagnostic tests for loiasis in a Non-Endemic area
title_sort performance of two serodiagnostic tests for loiasis in a non-endemic area
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32453734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008187
work_keys_str_mv AT gobbifederico performanceoftwoserodiagnostictestsforloiasisinanonendemicarea
AT buonfratedora performanceoftwoserodiagnostictestsforloiasisinanonendemicarea
AT boussinesqmichel performanceoftwoserodiagnostictestsforloiasisinanonendemicarea
AT chesnaiscedricb performanceoftwoserodiagnostictestsforloiasisinanonendemicarea
AT pionsebastiend performanceoftwoserodiagnostictestsforloiasisinanonendemicarea
AT silvaronaldo performanceoftwoserodiagnostictestsforloiasisinanonendemicarea
AT morolucia performanceoftwoserodiagnostictestsforloiasisinanonendemicarea
AT rodaripaola performanceoftwoserodiagnostictestsforloiasisinanonendemicarea
AT tamarozzifrancesca performanceoftwoserodiagnostictestsforloiasisinanonendemicarea
AT biamontemarco performanceoftwoserodiagnostictestsforloiasisinanonendemicarea
AT bisoffizeno performanceoftwoserodiagnostictestsforloiasisinanonendemicarea