Cargando…

Accuracy of blood-pressure monitors owned by patients with hypertension (ACCU-RATE study): a cross-sectional, observational study in central England

BACKGROUND: Home blood-pressure (BP) monitoring is recommended in guidelines and is increasingly popular with patients and health professionals, but the accuracy of patients’ own monitors in real-world use is not known. AIM: To assess the accuracy of home BP monitors used by people with hypertension...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hodgkinson, James A, Lee, Mei-Man, Milner, Siobhan, Bradburn, Peter, Stevens, Richard, Hobbs, FD Richard, Koshiaris, Constantinos, Grant, Sabrina, Mant, Jonathan, McManus, Richard J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32482629
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X710381
_version_ 1783542604341706752
author Hodgkinson, James A
Lee, Mei-Man
Milner, Siobhan
Bradburn, Peter
Stevens, Richard
Hobbs, FD Richard
Koshiaris, Constantinos
Grant, Sabrina
Mant, Jonathan
McManus, Richard J
author_facet Hodgkinson, James A
Lee, Mei-Man
Milner, Siobhan
Bradburn, Peter
Stevens, Richard
Hobbs, FD Richard
Koshiaris, Constantinos
Grant, Sabrina
Mant, Jonathan
McManus, Richard J
author_sort Hodgkinson, James A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Home blood-pressure (BP) monitoring is recommended in guidelines and is increasingly popular with patients and health professionals, but the accuracy of patients’ own monitors in real-world use is not known. AIM: To assess the accuracy of home BP monitors used by people with hypertension, and to investigate factors affecting accuracy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional, observational study in urban and suburban settings in central England. METHOD: Patients (n = 6891) on the hypertension register at seven practices in the West Midlands, England, were surveyed to ascertain whether they owned a BP monitor and wanted it tested. Monitor accuracy was compared with a calibrated reference device at 50 mmHg intervals between 0–280/300 mmHg (static pressure test); a difference from the reference monitor of +/−3 mmHg at any interval was considered a failure. Cuff performance was also assessed. Results were analysed by frequency of use, length of time in service, make and model, monitor validation status, purchase price, and any previous testing. RESULTS: In total, 251 (76%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 71 to 80%) of 331 tested devices passed all tests (monitors and cuffs), and 86% (CI] = 82 to 90%) passed the static pressure test; deficiencies were, primarily, because of monitors overestimating BP. A total of 40% of testable monitors were not validated. The pass rate on the static pressure test was greater in validated monitors (96%, 95% CI = 94 to 98%) versus unvalidated monitors (64%, 95% CI = 58 to 69%), those retailing for >£10 (90%, 95% CI = 86 to 94%), those retailing for ≤£10 (66%, 95% CI = 51 to 80%), those in use for ≤4 years (95%, 95% CI = 91 to 98%), and those in use for >4 years (74%, 95% CI = 67 to 82%). All in all, 12% of cuffs failed. CONCLUSION: Patients’ own BP monitor failure rate was similar to that demonstrated in studies performed in professional settings, although cuff failure was more frequent. Clinicians can be confident of the accuracy of patients’ own BP monitors if the devices are validated and ≤4 years old.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7274541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72745412020-06-15 Accuracy of blood-pressure monitors owned by patients with hypertension (ACCU-RATE study): a cross-sectional, observational study in central England Hodgkinson, James A Lee, Mei-Man Milner, Siobhan Bradburn, Peter Stevens, Richard Hobbs, FD Richard Koshiaris, Constantinos Grant, Sabrina Mant, Jonathan McManus, Richard J Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Home blood-pressure (BP) monitoring is recommended in guidelines and is increasingly popular with patients and health professionals, but the accuracy of patients’ own monitors in real-world use is not known. AIM: To assess the accuracy of home BP monitors used by people with hypertension, and to investigate factors affecting accuracy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional, observational study in urban and suburban settings in central England. METHOD: Patients (n = 6891) on the hypertension register at seven practices in the West Midlands, England, were surveyed to ascertain whether they owned a BP monitor and wanted it tested. Monitor accuracy was compared with a calibrated reference device at 50 mmHg intervals between 0–280/300 mmHg (static pressure test); a difference from the reference monitor of +/−3 mmHg at any interval was considered a failure. Cuff performance was also assessed. Results were analysed by frequency of use, length of time in service, make and model, monitor validation status, purchase price, and any previous testing. RESULTS: In total, 251 (76%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 71 to 80%) of 331 tested devices passed all tests (monitors and cuffs), and 86% (CI] = 82 to 90%) passed the static pressure test; deficiencies were, primarily, because of monitors overestimating BP. A total of 40% of testable monitors were not validated. The pass rate on the static pressure test was greater in validated monitors (96%, 95% CI = 94 to 98%) versus unvalidated monitors (64%, 95% CI = 58 to 69%), those retailing for >£10 (90%, 95% CI = 86 to 94%), those retailing for ≤£10 (66%, 95% CI = 51 to 80%), those in use for ≤4 years (95%, 95% CI = 91 to 98%), and those in use for >4 years (74%, 95% CI = 67 to 82%). All in all, 12% of cuffs failed. CONCLUSION: Patients’ own BP monitor failure rate was similar to that demonstrated in studies performed in professional settings, although cuff failure was more frequent. Clinicians can be confident of the accuracy of patients’ own BP monitors if the devices are validated and ≤4 years old. Royal College of General Practitioners 2020-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7274541/ /pubmed/32482629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X710381 Text en ©The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research
Hodgkinson, James A
Lee, Mei-Man
Milner, Siobhan
Bradburn, Peter
Stevens, Richard
Hobbs, FD Richard
Koshiaris, Constantinos
Grant, Sabrina
Mant, Jonathan
McManus, Richard J
Accuracy of blood-pressure monitors owned by patients with hypertension (ACCU-RATE study): a cross-sectional, observational study in central England
title Accuracy of blood-pressure monitors owned by patients with hypertension (ACCU-RATE study): a cross-sectional, observational study in central England
title_full Accuracy of blood-pressure monitors owned by patients with hypertension (ACCU-RATE study): a cross-sectional, observational study in central England
title_fullStr Accuracy of blood-pressure monitors owned by patients with hypertension (ACCU-RATE study): a cross-sectional, observational study in central England
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of blood-pressure monitors owned by patients with hypertension (ACCU-RATE study): a cross-sectional, observational study in central England
title_short Accuracy of blood-pressure monitors owned by patients with hypertension (ACCU-RATE study): a cross-sectional, observational study in central England
title_sort accuracy of blood-pressure monitors owned by patients with hypertension (accu-rate study): a cross-sectional, observational study in central england
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32482629
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X710381
work_keys_str_mv AT hodgkinsonjamesa accuracyofbloodpressuremonitorsownedbypatientswithhypertensionaccuratestudyacrosssectionalobservationalstudyincentralengland
AT leemeiman accuracyofbloodpressuremonitorsownedbypatientswithhypertensionaccuratestudyacrosssectionalobservationalstudyincentralengland
AT milnersiobhan accuracyofbloodpressuremonitorsownedbypatientswithhypertensionaccuratestudyacrosssectionalobservationalstudyincentralengland
AT bradburnpeter accuracyofbloodpressuremonitorsownedbypatientswithhypertensionaccuratestudyacrosssectionalobservationalstudyincentralengland
AT stevensrichard accuracyofbloodpressuremonitorsownedbypatientswithhypertensionaccuratestudyacrosssectionalobservationalstudyincentralengland
AT hobbsfdrichard accuracyofbloodpressuremonitorsownedbypatientswithhypertensionaccuratestudyacrosssectionalobservationalstudyincentralengland
AT koshiarisconstantinos accuracyofbloodpressuremonitorsownedbypatientswithhypertensionaccuratestudyacrosssectionalobservationalstudyincentralengland
AT grantsabrina accuracyofbloodpressuremonitorsownedbypatientswithhypertensionaccuratestudyacrosssectionalobservationalstudyincentralengland
AT mantjonathan accuracyofbloodpressuremonitorsownedbypatientswithhypertensionaccuratestudyacrosssectionalobservationalstudyincentralengland
AT mcmanusrichardj accuracyofbloodpressuremonitorsownedbypatientswithhypertensionaccuratestudyacrosssectionalobservationalstudyincentralengland