Cargando…
Statistical Methods for Processing Neuroimaging Data from Two Different Sites with a Down Syndrome Population Application
Harmonization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans from multi-scanner and multi-site studies presents a challenging problem. We applied the Removal of Artificial Voxel Effect by Linear regression (RAVEL) method to normalize T1-MRI intensities collected on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274647/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50153-2_28 |
_version_ | 1783542629109071872 |
---|---|
author | Minhas, Davneet S. Yang, Zixi Muschelli, John Laymon, Charles M. Mettenburg, Joseph M. Zammit, Matthew D. Johnson, Sterling Mathis, Chester A. Cohen, Ann D. Handen, Benjamin L. Klunk, William E. Crainiceanu, Ciprian M. Christian, Bradley T. Tudorascu, Dana L. |
author_facet | Minhas, Davneet S. Yang, Zixi Muschelli, John Laymon, Charles M. Mettenburg, Joseph M. Zammit, Matthew D. Johnson, Sterling Mathis, Chester A. Cohen, Ann D. Handen, Benjamin L. Klunk, William E. Crainiceanu, Ciprian M. Christian, Bradley T. Tudorascu, Dana L. |
author_sort | Minhas, Davneet S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Harmonization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans from multi-scanner and multi-site studies presents a challenging problem. We applied the Removal of Artificial Voxel Effect by Linear regression (RAVEL) method to normalize T1-MRI intensities collected on two different scanners across two different sites as part of the Neurodegeneration in Aging Down syndrome (NiAD) study. The effects on FreeSurfer regional cortical thickness and volume outcome measures, in addition to FreeSurfer-based regional quantification of amyloid PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) outcomes, were evaluated. A neuroradiologist visually assessed the accuracy of FreeSurfer hippocampus segmentations with and without the application of RAVEL. Quantitative results demonstrated that the application of RAVEL intensity normalization prior to running FreeSurfer significantly impacted both FreeSurfer volume and cortical thickness outcome measures. Visual assessment demonstrated that the application of RAVEL significantly improved FreeSurfer hippocampal segmentation accuracy. The RAVEL intensity normalization had little impact on PET SUVR measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7274647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72746472020-06-08 Statistical Methods for Processing Neuroimaging Data from Two Different Sites with a Down Syndrome Population Application Minhas, Davneet S. Yang, Zixi Muschelli, John Laymon, Charles M. Mettenburg, Joseph M. Zammit, Matthew D. Johnson, Sterling Mathis, Chester A. Cohen, Ann D. Handen, Benjamin L. Klunk, William E. Crainiceanu, Ciprian M. Christian, Bradley T. Tudorascu, Dana L. Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems Article Harmonization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans from multi-scanner and multi-site studies presents a challenging problem. We applied the Removal of Artificial Voxel Effect by Linear regression (RAVEL) method to normalize T1-MRI intensities collected on two different scanners across two different sites as part of the Neurodegeneration in Aging Down syndrome (NiAD) study. The effects on FreeSurfer regional cortical thickness and volume outcome measures, in addition to FreeSurfer-based regional quantification of amyloid PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) outcomes, were evaluated. A neuroradiologist visually assessed the accuracy of FreeSurfer hippocampus segmentations with and without the application of RAVEL. Quantitative results demonstrated that the application of RAVEL intensity normalization prior to running FreeSurfer significantly impacted both FreeSurfer volume and cortical thickness outcome measures. Visual assessment demonstrated that the application of RAVEL significantly improved FreeSurfer hippocampal segmentation accuracy. The RAVEL intensity normalization had little impact on PET SUVR measures. 2020-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7274647/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50153-2_28 Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Minhas, Davneet S. Yang, Zixi Muschelli, John Laymon, Charles M. Mettenburg, Joseph M. Zammit, Matthew D. Johnson, Sterling Mathis, Chester A. Cohen, Ann D. Handen, Benjamin L. Klunk, William E. Crainiceanu, Ciprian M. Christian, Bradley T. Tudorascu, Dana L. Statistical Methods for Processing Neuroimaging Data from Two Different Sites with a Down Syndrome Population Application |
title | Statistical Methods for Processing Neuroimaging Data from Two Different Sites with a Down Syndrome Population Application |
title_full | Statistical Methods for Processing Neuroimaging Data from Two Different Sites with a Down Syndrome Population Application |
title_fullStr | Statistical Methods for Processing Neuroimaging Data from Two Different Sites with a Down Syndrome Population Application |
title_full_unstemmed | Statistical Methods for Processing Neuroimaging Data from Two Different Sites with a Down Syndrome Population Application |
title_short | Statistical Methods for Processing Neuroimaging Data from Two Different Sites with a Down Syndrome Population Application |
title_sort | statistical methods for processing neuroimaging data from two different sites with a down syndrome population application |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274647/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50153-2_28 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minhasdavneets statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication AT yangzixi statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication AT muschellijohn statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication AT laymoncharlesm statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication AT mettenburgjosephm statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication AT zammitmatthewd statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication AT johnsonsterling statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication AT mathischestera statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication AT cohenannd statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication AT handenbenjaminl statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication AT klunkwilliame statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication AT crainiceanuciprianm statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication AT christianbradleyt statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication AT tudorascudanal statisticalmethodsforprocessingneuroimagingdatafromtwodifferentsiteswithadownsyndromepopulationapplication |