Cargando…

Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation

Objective  Verification of the accuracy of crown fit before final cementation is imperative. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the film thickness of commonly used dental crown disclosing materials and their comparison with final cement thickness. Materials and Methods One hundred fifty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habib, Syed Rashid, Ansari, Abdul Sadekh, Bajunaid, Salwa Omar, Alshahrani, Abdullah, Javed, Muhammad Qasim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708560
_version_ 1783542668189499392
author Habib, Syed Rashid
Ansari, Abdul Sadekh
Bajunaid, Salwa Omar
Alshahrani, Abdullah
Javed, Muhammad Qasim
author_facet Habib, Syed Rashid
Ansari, Abdul Sadekh
Bajunaid, Salwa Omar
Alshahrani, Abdullah
Javed, Muhammad Qasim
author_sort Habib, Syed Rashid
collection PubMed
description Objective  Verification of the accuracy of crown fit before final cementation is imperative. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the film thickness of commonly used dental crown disclosing materials and their comparison with final cement thickness. Materials and Methods One hundred fifty provisional crowns (Protemp) were fabricated on standardized resin dies and divided into five groups ( N = 150; n = 30) based on five disclosing agents: A = Fit-Checker auto-mix; B = Okklu-top; C = Express; D = Fit-Checker hand-mix; E = Coltene PSI, and Final cement = Relyx U200. Crowns were loaded with test materials, tried over dies under load (50N), and later cemented under same load. Film thickness (µm) was recorded between crown margin and the finish line of die after loading with test material and final cementation using a digital microscope. Statistical Analysis  Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, Tukey’s and paired t -test were used for statistical analysis ( p < 0.05). Results  Significant variations were found between the film thicknesses of the five disclosing agents ( p = 0.019). Group-A showed the lowest (131.67 ± 101.10 μm), while group-B (295.00 ± 263.88 μm) showed the highest film thickness ( p = 0.011). Film thicknesses after cementation were similar for groups ( p = 0.957). Significant difference was observed for group-B disclosing agent versus final cement ( p = 0.010). The lowest mean difference between the film thicknesses of the disclosing agent and final cementation of 13.1 μm was revealed for group-A. Conclusions  Variations in the film thicknesses of the tested disclosing agents were found. Fit-Checker auto-mix was found with minimal film thickness and satisfied the requirements as the disclosing agent, while Okklu-top aerosol spray did not.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7274821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72748212020-06-10 Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation Habib, Syed Rashid Ansari, Abdul Sadekh Bajunaid, Salwa Omar Alshahrani, Abdullah Javed, Muhammad Qasim Eur J Dent Objective  Verification of the accuracy of crown fit before final cementation is imperative. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the film thickness of commonly used dental crown disclosing materials and their comparison with final cement thickness. Materials and Methods One hundred fifty provisional crowns (Protemp) were fabricated on standardized resin dies and divided into five groups ( N = 150; n = 30) based on five disclosing agents: A = Fit-Checker auto-mix; B = Okklu-top; C = Express; D = Fit-Checker hand-mix; E = Coltene PSI, and Final cement = Relyx U200. Crowns were loaded with test materials, tried over dies under load (50N), and later cemented under same load. Film thickness (µm) was recorded between crown margin and the finish line of die after loading with test material and final cementation using a digital microscope. Statistical Analysis  Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, Tukey’s and paired t -test were used for statistical analysis ( p < 0.05). Results  Significant variations were found between the film thicknesses of the five disclosing agents ( p = 0.019). Group-A showed the lowest (131.67 ± 101.10 μm), while group-B (295.00 ± 263.88 μm) showed the highest film thickness ( p = 0.011). Film thicknesses after cementation were similar for groups ( p = 0.957). Significant difference was observed for group-B disclosing agent versus final cement ( p = 0.010). The lowest mean difference between the film thicknesses of the disclosing agent and final cementation of 13.1 μm was revealed for group-A. Conclusions  Variations in the film thicknesses of the tested disclosing agents were found. Fit-Checker auto-mix was found with minimal film thickness and satisfied the requirements as the disclosing agent, while Okklu-top aerosol spray did not. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2020-05 2020-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7274821/ /pubmed/32375183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708560 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Habib, Syed Rashid
Ansari, Abdul Sadekh
Bajunaid, Salwa Omar
Alshahrani, Abdullah
Javed, Muhammad Qasim
Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation
title Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation
title_full Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation
title_fullStr Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation
title_short Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation
title_sort evaluation of film thickness of crown disclosing agents and their comparison with cement film thickness after final cementation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708560
work_keys_str_mv AT habibsyedrashid evaluationoffilmthicknessofcrowndisclosingagentsandtheircomparisonwithcementfilmthicknessafterfinalcementation
AT ansariabdulsadekh evaluationoffilmthicknessofcrowndisclosingagentsandtheircomparisonwithcementfilmthicknessafterfinalcementation
AT bajunaidsalwaomar evaluationoffilmthicknessofcrowndisclosingagentsandtheircomparisonwithcementfilmthicknessafterfinalcementation
AT alshahraniabdullah evaluationoffilmthicknessofcrowndisclosingagentsandtheircomparisonwithcementfilmthicknessafterfinalcementation
AT javedmuhammadqasim evaluationoffilmthicknessofcrowndisclosingagentsandtheircomparisonwithcementfilmthicknessafterfinalcementation