Cargando…
Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation
Objective Verification of the accuracy of crown fit before final cementation is imperative. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the film thickness of commonly used dental crown disclosing materials and their comparison with final cement thickness. Materials and Methods One hundred fifty...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708560 |
_version_ | 1783542668189499392 |
---|---|
author | Habib, Syed Rashid Ansari, Abdul Sadekh Bajunaid, Salwa Omar Alshahrani, Abdullah Javed, Muhammad Qasim |
author_facet | Habib, Syed Rashid Ansari, Abdul Sadekh Bajunaid, Salwa Omar Alshahrani, Abdullah Javed, Muhammad Qasim |
author_sort | Habib, Syed Rashid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective Verification of the accuracy of crown fit before final cementation is imperative. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the film thickness of commonly used dental crown disclosing materials and their comparison with final cement thickness. Materials and Methods One hundred fifty provisional crowns (Protemp) were fabricated on standardized resin dies and divided into five groups ( N = 150; n = 30) based on five disclosing agents: A = Fit-Checker auto-mix; B = Okklu-top; C = Express; D = Fit-Checker hand-mix; E = Coltene PSI, and Final cement = Relyx U200. Crowns were loaded with test materials, tried over dies under load (50N), and later cemented under same load. Film thickness (µm) was recorded between crown margin and the finish line of die after loading with test material and final cementation using a digital microscope. Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, Tukey’s and paired t -test were used for statistical analysis ( p < 0.05). Results Significant variations were found between the film thicknesses of the five disclosing agents ( p = 0.019). Group-A showed the lowest (131.67 ± 101.10 μm), while group-B (295.00 ± 263.88 μm) showed the highest film thickness ( p = 0.011). Film thicknesses after cementation were similar for groups ( p = 0.957). Significant difference was observed for group-B disclosing agent versus final cement ( p = 0.010). The lowest mean difference between the film thicknesses of the disclosing agent and final cementation of 13.1 μm was revealed for group-A. Conclusions Variations in the film thicknesses of the tested disclosing agents were found. Fit-Checker auto-mix was found with minimal film thickness and satisfied the requirements as the disclosing agent, while Okklu-top aerosol spray did not. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7274821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72748212020-06-10 Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation Habib, Syed Rashid Ansari, Abdul Sadekh Bajunaid, Salwa Omar Alshahrani, Abdullah Javed, Muhammad Qasim Eur J Dent Objective Verification of the accuracy of crown fit before final cementation is imperative. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the film thickness of commonly used dental crown disclosing materials and their comparison with final cement thickness. Materials and Methods One hundred fifty provisional crowns (Protemp) were fabricated on standardized resin dies and divided into five groups ( N = 150; n = 30) based on five disclosing agents: A = Fit-Checker auto-mix; B = Okklu-top; C = Express; D = Fit-Checker hand-mix; E = Coltene PSI, and Final cement = Relyx U200. Crowns were loaded with test materials, tried over dies under load (50N), and later cemented under same load. Film thickness (µm) was recorded between crown margin and the finish line of die after loading with test material and final cementation using a digital microscope. Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, Tukey’s and paired t -test were used for statistical analysis ( p < 0.05). Results Significant variations were found between the film thicknesses of the five disclosing agents ( p = 0.019). Group-A showed the lowest (131.67 ± 101.10 μm), while group-B (295.00 ± 263.88 μm) showed the highest film thickness ( p = 0.011). Film thicknesses after cementation were similar for groups ( p = 0.957). Significant difference was observed for group-B disclosing agent versus final cement ( p = 0.010). The lowest mean difference between the film thicknesses of the disclosing agent and final cementation of 13.1 μm was revealed for group-A. Conclusions Variations in the film thicknesses of the tested disclosing agents were found. Fit-Checker auto-mix was found with minimal film thickness and satisfied the requirements as the disclosing agent, while Okklu-top aerosol spray did not. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2020-05 2020-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7274821/ /pubmed/32375183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708560 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Habib, Syed Rashid Ansari, Abdul Sadekh Bajunaid, Salwa Omar Alshahrani, Abdullah Javed, Muhammad Qasim Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation |
title | Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation |
title_full | Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation |
title_short | Evaluation of Film Thickness of Crown Disclosing Agents and Their Comparison with Cement Film Thickness after Final Cementation |
title_sort | evaluation of film thickness of crown disclosing agents and their comparison with cement film thickness after final cementation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708560 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT habibsyedrashid evaluationoffilmthicknessofcrowndisclosingagentsandtheircomparisonwithcementfilmthicknessafterfinalcementation AT ansariabdulsadekh evaluationoffilmthicknessofcrowndisclosingagentsandtheircomparisonwithcementfilmthicknessafterfinalcementation AT bajunaidsalwaomar evaluationoffilmthicknessofcrowndisclosingagentsandtheircomparisonwithcementfilmthicknessafterfinalcementation AT alshahraniabdullah evaluationoffilmthicknessofcrowndisclosingagentsandtheircomparisonwithcementfilmthicknessafterfinalcementation AT javedmuhammadqasim evaluationoffilmthicknessofcrowndisclosingagentsandtheircomparisonwithcementfilmthicknessafterfinalcementation |