Cargando…

Fracture Toughness Comparison of Three Indirect Composite Resins Using 4-Point Flexural Strength Method

Objectives  The advantages of indirect composite restorations such as less crack formation during their computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing process, compared with ceramic restorations, have resulted in their growing popularity. However, restoration failure is a major concern with rega...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moradi, Zohreh, Abbasi, Mahdi, Khalesi, Rayhaneh, Tabatabaei, Masoumeh Hasani, Shahidi, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32283561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708438
_version_ 1783542669372293120
author Moradi, Zohreh
Abbasi, Mahdi
Khalesi, Rayhaneh
Tabatabaei, Masoumeh Hasani
Shahidi, Zahra
author_facet Moradi, Zohreh
Abbasi, Mahdi
Khalesi, Rayhaneh
Tabatabaei, Masoumeh Hasani
Shahidi, Zahra
author_sort Moradi, Zohreh
collection PubMed
description Objectives  The advantages of indirect composite restorations such as less crack formation during their computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing process, compared with ceramic restorations, have resulted in their growing popularity. However, restoration failure is a major concern with regard to the long-term clinical success of restorations and may occur as the result of propagation of a crack originated from an internal flaw in the restoration. This study aimed to compare the fracture toughness of three indirect composite resins. Materials and Methods In this in vitro experimental study, 10 specimens measuring 3 × 3 × 18 mm were fabricated of Gradia, Crios, and high impact polymer composite indirect composites. A single edge notch with a diameter < 0.3 mm and 0.3 mm length was created in the 9 mm longitudinal dimension of specimens using a no. 11 surgical scalpel. The specimens were then subjected to 4-point flexural strength test in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.1 mm/s until failure. Statistical Analysis  Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s HSD (honestly significant difference) test. The statistical power was set at p ˂ 0.05. Results  One-way ANOVA showed a significant difference in fracture toughness of the three composite groups ( p = 0.000). According to the Tukey HSD analysis, the fracture toughness of HIPC was significantly higher than that of the other two composites. The fracture toughness of Gradia was significantly lower among all. Conclusions  Within the limitations of this study, the results showed that high temperature-pressure polymerization can increase resistance to crack propagation and subsequently improve the clinical service of indirect composite restorations. Although we do not know the filler volume percentage of HIPC, it seems that filler volume percentage of the composite is inversely correlated with fracture toughness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7274826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72748262020-06-10 Fracture Toughness Comparison of Three Indirect Composite Resins Using 4-Point Flexural Strength Method Moradi, Zohreh Abbasi, Mahdi Khalesi, Rayhaneh Tabatabaei, Masoumeh Hasani Shahidi, Zahra Eur J Dent Objectives  The advantages of indirect composite restorations such as less crack formation during their computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing process, compared with ceramic restorations, have resulted in their growing popularity. However, restoration failure is a major concern with regard to the long-term clinical success of restorations and may occur as the result of propagation of a crack originated from an internal flaw in the restoration. This study aimed to compare the fracture toughness of three indirect composite resins. Materials and Methods In this in vitro experimental study, 10 specimens measuring 3 × 3 × 18 mm were fabricated of Gradia, Crios, and high impact polymer composite indirect composites. A single edge notch with a diameter < 0.3 mm and 0.3 mm length was created in the 9 mm longitudinal dimension of specimens using a no. 11 surgical scalpel. The specimens were then subjected to 4-point flexural strength test in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.1 mm/s until failure. Statistical Analysis  Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s HSD (honestly significant difference) test. The statistical power was set at p ˂ 0.05. Results  One-way ANOVA showed a significant difference in fracture toughness of the three composite groups ( p = 0.000). According to the Tukey HSD analysis, the fracture toughness of HIPC was significantly higher than that of the other two composites. The fracture toughness of Gradia was significantly lower among all. Conclusions  Within the limitations of this study, the results showed that high temperature-pressure polymerization can increase resistance to crack propagation and subsequently improve the clinical service of indirect composite restorations. Although we do not know the filler volume percentage of HIPC, it seems that filler volume percentage of the composite is inversely correlated with fracture toughness. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2020-05 2020-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7274826/ /pubmed/32283561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708438 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Moradi, Zohreh
Abbasi, Mahdi
Khalesi, Rayhaneh
Tabatabaei, Masoumeh Hasani
Shahidi, Zahra
Fracture Toughness Comparison of Three Indirect Composite Resins Using 4-Point Flexural Strength Method
title Fracture Toughness Comparison of Three Indirect Composite Resins Using 4-Point Flexural Strength Method
title_full Fracture Toughness Comparison of Three Indirect Composite Resins Using 4-Point Flexural Strength Method
title_fullStr Fracture Toughness Comparison of Three Indirect Composite Resins Using 4-Point Flexural Strength Method
title_full_unstemmed Fracture Toughness Comparison of Three Indirect Composite Resins Using 4-Point Flexural Strength Method
title_short Fracture Toughness Comparison of Three Indirect Composite Resins Using 4-Point Flexural Strength Method
title_sort fracture toughness comparison of three indirect composite resins using 4-point flexural strength method
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32283561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708438
work_keys_str_mv AT moradizohreh fracturetoughnesscomparisonofthreeindirectcompositeresinsusing4pointflexuralstrengthmethod
AT abbasimahdi fracturetoughnesscomparisonofthreeindirectcompositeresinsusing4pointflexuralstrengthmethod
AT khalesirayhaneh fracturetoughnesscomparisonofthreeindirectcompositeresinsusing4pointflexuralstrengthmethod
AT tabatabaeimasoumehhasani fracturetoughnesscomparisonofthreeindirectcompositeresinsusing4pointflexuralstrengthmethod
AT shahidizahra fracturetoughnesscomparisonofthreeindirectcompositeresinsusing4pointflexuralstrengthmethod