Cargando…

Validation of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery in intellectual disability

OBJECTIVE: To advance the science of cognitive outcome measurement for individuals with intellectual disability (ID), we established administration guidelines and evaluated the psychometric properties of the NIH-Toolbox Cognitive Battery (NIHTB-CB) for use in clinical research. METHODS: We assessed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shields, Rebecca H., Kaat, Aaron J., McKenzie, Forrest J., Drayton, Andrea, Sansone, Stephanie M., Coleman, Jeanine, Michalak, Claire, Riley, Karen, Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth, Gershon, Richard C., Widaman, Keith F., Hessl, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32094241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009131
_version_ 1783542675485491200
author Shields, Rebecca H.
Kaat, Aaron J.
McKenzie, Forrest J.
Drayton, Andrea
Sansone, Stephanie M.
Coleman, Jeanine
Michalak, Claire
Riley, Karen
Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth
Gershon, Richard C.
Widaman, Keith F.
Hessl, David
author_facet Shields, Rebecca H.
Kaat, Aaron J.
McKenzie, Forrest J.
Drayton, Andrea
Sansone, Stephanie M.
Coleman, Jeanine
Michalak, Claire
Riley, Karen
Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth
Gershon, Richard C.
Widaman, Keith F.
Hessl, David
author_sort Shields, Rebecca H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To advance the science of cognitive outcome measurement for individuals with intellectual disability (ID), we established administration guidelines and evaluated the psychometric properties of the NIH-Toolbox Cognitive Battery (NIHTB-CB) for use in clinical research. METHODS: We assessed feasibility, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity of the NIHTB-CB (measuring executive function, processing speed, memory, and language) by assessing 242 individuals with fragile X syndrome (FXS), Down syndrome (DS), and other ID, ages 6 through 25 years, with retesting completed after 1 month. To facilitate accessibility and measurement accuracy, we developed accommodations and standard assessment guidelines, documented in an e-manual. Finally, we assessed the sensitivity of the battery to expected syndrome-specific cognitive phenotypes. RESULTS: Above a mental age of 5.0 years, all tests had excellent feasibility. More varied feasibility across tests was seen between mental ages of 3 and 4 years. Reliability and convergent validity ranged from moderate to strong. Each test and the Crystallized and Fluid Composite scores correlated moderately to strongly with IQ, and the Crystallized Composite had modest correlations with adaptive behavior. The NIHTB-CB showed known-groups validity by detecting expected executive function deficits in FXS and a receptive language deficit in DS. CONCLUSION: The NIHTB-CB is a reliable and valid test battery for children and young adults with ID with a mental age of ≈5 years and above. Adaptations for very low-functioning or younger children with ID are needed for some subtests to expand the developmental range of the battery. Studies examining sensitivity to developmental and treatment changes are now warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7274932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72749322020-06-23 Validation of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery in intellectual disability Shields, Rebecca H. Kaat, Aaron J. McKenzie, Forrest J. Drayton, Andrea Sansone, Stephanie M. Coleman, Jeanine Michalak, Claire Riley, Karen Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth Gershon, Richard C. Widaman, Keith F. Hessl, David Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To advance the science of cognitive outcome measurement for individuals with intellectual disability (ID), we established administration guidelines and evaluated the psychometric properties of the NIH-Toolbox Cognitive Battery (NIHTB-CB) for use in clinical research. METHODS: We assessed feasibility, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity of the NIHTB-CB (measuring executive function, processing speed, memory, and language) by assessing 242 individuals with fragile X syndrome (FXS), Down syndrome (DS), and other ID, ages 6 through 25 years, with retesting completed after 1 month. To facilitate accessibility and measurement accuracy, we developed accommodations and standard assessment guidelines, documented in an e-manual. Finally, we assessed the sensitivity of the battery to expected syndrome-specific cognitive phenotypes. RESULTS: Above a mental age of 5.0 years, all tests had excellent feasibility. More varied feasibility across tests was seen between mental ages of 3 and 4 years. Reliability and convergent validity ranged from moderate to strong. Each test and the Crystallized and Fluid Composite scores correlated moderately to strongly with IQ, and the Crystallized Composite had modest correlations with adaptive behavior. The NIHTB-CB showed known-groups validity by detecting expected executive function deficits in FXS and a receptive language deficit in DS. CONCLUSION: The NIHTB-CB is a reliable and valid test battery for children and young adults with ID with a mental age of ≈5 years and above. Adaptations for very low-functioning or younger children with ID are needed for some subtests to expand the developmental range of the battery. Studies examining sensitivity to developmental and treatment changes are now warranted. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7274932/ /pubmed/32094241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009131 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Shields, Rebecca H.
Kaat, Aaron J.
McKenzie, Forrest J.
Drayton, Andrea
Sansone, Stephanie M.
Coleman, Jeanine
Michalak, Claire
Riley, Karen
Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth
Gershon, Richard C.
Widaman, Keith F.
Hessl, David
Validation of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery in intellectual disability
title Validation of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery in intellectual disability
title_full Validation of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery in intellectual disability
title_fullStr Validation of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery in intellectual disability
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery in intellectual disability
title_short Validation of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery in intellectual disability
title_sort validation of the nih toolbox cognitive battery in intellectual disability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32094241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009131
work_keys_str_mv AT shieldsrebeccah validationofthenihtoolboxcognitivebatteryinintellectualdisability
AT kaataaronj validationofthenihtoolboxcognitivebatteryinintellectualdisability
AT mckenzieforrestj validationofthenihtoolboxcognitivebatteryinintellectualdisability
AT draytonandrea validationofthenihtoolboxcognitivebatteryinintellectualdisability
AT sansonestephaniem validationofthenihtoolboxcognitivebatteryinintellectualdisability
AT colemanjeanine validationofthenihtoolboxcognitivebatteryinintellectualdisability
AT michalakclaire validationofthenihtoolboxcognitivebatteryinintellectualdisability
AT rileykaren validationofthenihtoolboxcognitivebatteryinintellectualdisability
AT berrykraviselizabeth validationofthenihtoolboxcognitivebatteryinintellectualdisability
AT gershonrichardc validationofthenihtoolboxcognitivebatteryinintellectualdisability
AT widamankeithf validationofthenihtoolboxcognitivebatteryinintellectualdisability
AT hessldavid validationofthenihtoolboxcognitivebatteryinintellectualdisability