Cargando…

EndoPredict(®) in early hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE: Evaluating consecutive early breast cancer patients, we analyzed both the impact of EndoPredict(®) on clinical decisions as well as clinico-pathological factors influencing the decision to perform this gene expression test. METHODS: Hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almstedt, K., Mendoza, S., Otto, M., Battista, M. J., Steetskamp, J., Heimes, A. S., Krajnak, S., Poplawski, A., Gerhold-Ay, A., Hasenburg, A., Denkert, C., Schmidt, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32436145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05688-1
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Evaluating consecutive early breast cancer patients, we analyzed both the impact of EndoPredict(®) on clinical decisions as well as clinico-pathological factors influencing the decision to perform this gene expression test. METHODS: Hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer patients treated between 2011 and 2016 were included in this study to investigate the role of EndoPredict(®) (EPclin) in the treatment of early breast cancer. A main study aim was to analyze the changes in therapy recommendations with and without EPclin. In addition, the impact of clinico-pathological parameters for the decision to perform EPclin was examined by Pearson's chi-squared test (χ(2)-test) and Fisher's exact test as well as univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: In a cohort of 869 consecutive early HR-positive, HER-negative breast cancer patients, EPclin was utilized in 156 (18.0%) patients. EPclin led to changes in therapy recommendations in 33.3% (n = 52), with both therapy escalation in 19.2% (n = 30) and de-escalation in 14.1% (n = 22). The clinico-pathological factors influencing the use of EPclin were age (P < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 0.498), tumor size (P = 0.011, OR 0.071), nodal status (P = 0.021, OR 1.674), histological grade (P = 0.043, OR 0.432), and Ki-67 (P < 0.001, OR 3.599). CONCLUSIONS: EPclin led to a change in therapy recommendations in one third of the patients. Clinico-pathological parameters such as younger age, smaller tumor size, positive nodal status, intermediate histological grade and intermediate Ki-67 had a significant influence on the use of EndoPredict(®). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05688-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.