Cargando…

“I wasn’t ready”: abortion decision-making pathways in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

OBJECTIVES: This study explores abortion decision-making trajectories in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, examining the spaces for decision making that young people manage to create for themselves within restrictive policy, gender norms and other constraints. METHODS: The study presents data collected fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouedraogo, Ramatou, Senderowicz, Leigh, Ngbichi, Coralie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32270237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01359-6
_version_ 1783542713541459968
author Ouedraogo, Ramatou
Senderowicz, Leigh
Ngbichi, Coralie
author_facet Ouedraogo, Ramatou
Senderowicz, Leigh
Ngbichi, Coralie
author_sort Ouedraogo, Ramatou
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study explores abortion decision-making trajectories in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, examining the spaces for decision making that young people manage to create for themselves within restrictive policy, gender norms and other constraints. METHODS: The study presents data collected from observations in three referral health facilities in Ouagadougou and interviews (with 31 young women (aged 17–25) who had sought abortions and five men (aged 20–25) whose partners had done so). Using inductive content analysis, we capture the different streams, actors and rationales in the decision-making process, as well as the pattern of negotiation. RESULTS: Abortion decision-making trajectories are complex and affected by a range of factors including fertility desires, relationship stability and financial stability. The process can include intense periods of negotiation between intimate partners when their rationales are discordant. Constraints on women’s decision making include restrictive policy environment, coercion from partners (threats, emotional blackmail and even physical force) and pressure from people in and out of their social network. CONCLUSIONS: In a context where legal abortion is highly restricted and women’s decision-making power is constrained, the abortion decision making appears as collective, operates in an uncertain time frame, an unofficial social environment and has an unpredictable collaborative mechanism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7275093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72750932020-06-16 “I wasn’t ready”: abortion decision-making pathways in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso Ouedraogo, Ramatou Senderowicz, Leigh Ngbichi, Coralie Int J Public Health Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study explores abortion decision-making trajectories in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, examining the spaces for decision making that young people manage to create for themselves within restrictive policy, gender norms and other constraints. METHODS: The study presents data collected from observations in three referral health facilities in Ouagadougou and interviews (with 31 young women (aged 17–25) who had sought abortions and five men (aged 20–25) whose partners had done so). Using inductive content analysis, we capture the different streams, actors and rationales in the decision-making process, as well as the pattern of negotiation. RESULTS: Abortion decision-making trajectories are complex and affected by a range of factors including fertility desires, relationship stability and financial stability. The process can include intense periods of negotiation between intimate partners when their rationales are discordant. Constraints on women’s decision making include restrictive policy environment, coercion from partners (threats, emotional blackmail and even physical force) and pressure from people in and out of their social network. CONCLUSIONS: In a context where legal abortion is highly restricted and women’s decision-making power is constrained, the abortion decision making appears as collective, operates in an uncertain time frame, an unofficial social environment and has an unpredictable collaborative mechanism. Springer International Publishing 2020-04-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7275093/ /pubmed/32270237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01359-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ouedraogo, Ramatou
Senderowicz, Leigh
Ngbichi, Coralie
“I wasn’t ready”: abortion decision-making pathways in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
title “I wasn’t ready”: abortion decision-making pathways in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
title_full “I wasn’t ready”: abortion decision-making pathways in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
title_fullStr “I wasn’t ready”: abortion decision-making pathways in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
title_full_unstemmed “I wasn’t ready”: abortion decision-making pathways in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
title_short “I wasn’t ready”: abortion decision-making pathways in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
title_sort “i wasn’t ready”: abortion decision-making pathways in ouagadougou, burkina faso
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32270237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01359-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ouedraogoramatou iwasntreadyabortiondecisionmakingpathwaysinouagadougouburkinafaso
AT senderowiczleigh iwasntreadyabortiondecisionmakingpathwaysinouagadougouburkinafaso
AT ngbichicoralie iwasntreadyabortiondecisionmakingpathwaysinouagadougouburkinafaso