Cargando…

Subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks

Effort as a concept, whether momentary, sustained, or as a function of different task conditions, is of critical importance to resource theories of attention, fatigue/boredom, workplace motivation, career selection, performance, job incentives, and other applied psychology concerns. Various models o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ackerman, Phillip L., Tatel, Corey E., Lyndgaard, Sibley F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32504129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00226-5
_version_ 1783542716130394112
author Ackerman, Phillip L.
Tatel, Corey E.
Lyndgaard, Sibley F.
author_facet Ackerman, Phillip L.
Tatel, Corey E.
Lyndgaard, Sibley F.
author_sort Ackerman, Phillip L.
collection PubMed
description Effort as a concept, whether momentary, sustained, or as a function of different task conditions, is of critical importance to resource theories of attention, fatigue/boredom, workplace motivation, career selection, performance, job incentives, and other applied psychology concerns. Various models of motivation suggest that there is an inverted-U-shaped function describing the personal utility of effort, but there are expected to be individual differences in the optimal levels of effort that also are related to specific domain preferences. The current study assessed the disutility of effort for 125 different tasks/activities and also explored individual differences correlates of task preferences, in a sample of 77 undergraduate participants. The participants rated each activity in terms of the amount of compensation they would require to perform the task for a period of 4 h. They also completed paired comparisons for a subset of 24 items, followed by a set of preference judgments. Multidimensional scaling and preference scaling techniques were used to determine individual differences in task preference. Personality, motivation, and interest traits were shown to be substantially related to task preferences. Implications for understanding which individuals are oriented toward or away from tasks with different effort demands are discussed, along with considerations for the dynamics of attentional effort allocations during task performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7275105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72751052020-06-15 Subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks Ackerman, Phillip L. Tatel, Corey E. Lyndgaard, Sibley F. Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article Effort as a concept, whether momentary, sustained, or as a function of different task conditions, is of critical importance to resource theories of attention, fatigue/boredom, workplace motivation, career selection, performance, job incentives, and other applied psychology concerns. Various models of motivation suggest that there is an inverted-U-shaped function describing the personal utility of effort, but there are expected to be individual differences in the optimal levels of effort that also are related to specific domain preferences. The current study assessed the disutility of effort for 125 different tasks/activities and also explored individual differences correlates of task preferences, in a sample of 77 undergraduate participants. The participants rated each activity in terms of the amount of compensation they would require to perform the task for a period of 4 h. They also completed paired comparisons for a subset of 24 items, followed by a set of preference judgments. Multidimensional scaling and preference scaling techniques were used to determine individual differences in task preference. Personality, motivation, and interest traits were shown to be substantially related to task preferences. Implications for understanding which individuals are oriented toward or away from tasks with different effort demands are discussed, along with considerations for the dynamics of attentional effort allocations during task performance. Springer International Publishing 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7275105/ /pubmed/32504129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00226-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ackerman, Phillip L.
Tatel, Corey E.
Lyndgaard, Sibley F.
Subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks
title Subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks
title_full Subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks
title_fullStr Subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks
title_full_unstemmed Subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks
title_short Subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks
title_sort subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32504129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00226-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ackermanphillipl subjectivedisutilityofeffortmentallyandphysicallydemandingtasks
AT tatelcoreye subjectivedisutilityofeffortmentallyandphysicallydemandingtasks
AT lyndgaardsibleyf subjectivedisutilityofeffortmentallyandphysicallydemandingtasks