Cargando…

Our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness of root cause analysis (RCA) recommendations and propose possible ways to enhance its quality in Hong Kong public hospitals. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed across 43 public hospitals and institutes in Hong Kong, reviewing RCA re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwok, Yick Ting A, Mah, Alastair PY, Pang, Katherine MC
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32503514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05356-6
_version_ 1783542762564485120
author Kwok, Yick Ting A
Mah, Alastair PY
Pang, Katherine MC
author_facet Kwok, Yick Ting A
Mah, Alastair PY
Pang, Katherine MC
author_sort Kwok, Yick Ting A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness of root cause analysis (RCA) recommendations and propose possible ways to enhance its quality in Hong Kong public hospitals. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed across 43 public hospitals and institutes in Hong Kong, reviewing RCA reports of all Sentinel Events and Serious Untoward Events within a two-year period. The incident nature, types of root causes and strengths of recommendations were analysed. The RCA recommendations were categorised as ‘strong’, ‘medium’ or ‘weak’ strengths utilizing the US’s Veteran Affairs National Center for Patient Safety action hierarchy. RESULTS: A total of 214 reports from October 2016 to September 2018 were reviewed. These reports generated 504 root causes, averaging 2.4 per RCA report, and comprising 249 (49%) system, 233 (46%) staff behavioural and 22 (4%) patient factors. There were 760 recommendations identified in the RCA reports with an average of 3.6 per RCA. Of these, 18 (2%) recommendations were rated strong, 116 (15%) medium and 626 (82%) weak. Most recommendations were related to ‘training and education’ (466, 61%), ‘additional study/review’ (104, 14%) and ‘review/enhancement of policy/guideline’ (39, 5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provided insights about the effectiveness of RCA recommendations across all public hospitals in Hong Kong. The results showed a high proportion of root causes were attributed to staff behavioural factors and most of the recommendations were weak. The reasons include the lack of training, tools and expertise, appropriateness of panel composition, and complicated processes in carrying out large scale improvements. The Review Team suggested conducting regular RCA training, adopting easy-to-use tools, enhancing panel composition with human factors expertise, promoting an organization-wide safety culture to staff and aggregating analysis of incidents as possible improvement actions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7275338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72753382020-06-08 Our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals Kwok, Yick Ting A Mah, Alastair PY Pang, Katherine MC BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness of root cause analysis (RCA) recommendations and propose possible ways to enhance its quality in Hong Kong public hospitals. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed across 43 public hospitals and institutes in Hong Kong, reviewing RCA reports of all Sentinel Events and Serious Untoward Events within a two-year period. The incident nature, types of root causes and strengths of recommendations were analysed. The RCA recommendations were categorised as ‘strong’, ‘medium’ or ‘weak’ strengths utilizing the US’s Veteran Affairs National Center for Patient Safety action hierarchy. RESULTS: A total of 214 reports from October 2016 to September 2018 were reviewed. These reports generated 504 root causes, averaging 2.4 per RCA report, and comprising 249 (49%) system, 233 (46%) staff behavioural and 22 (4%) patient factors. There were 760 recommendations identified in the RCA reports with an average of 3.6 per RCA. Of these, 18 (2%) recommendations were rated strong, 116 (15%) medium and 626 (82%) weak. Most recommendations were related to ‘training and education’ (466, 61%), ‘additional study/review’ (104, 14%) and ‘review/enhancement of policy/guideline’ (39, 5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provided insights about the effectiveness of RCA recommendations across all public hospitals in Hong Kong. The results showed a high proportion of root causes were attributed to staff behavioural factors and most of the recommendations were weak. The reasons include the lack of training, tools and expertise, appropriateness of panel composition, and complicated processes in carrying out large scale improvements. The Review Team suggested conducting regular RCA training, adopting easy-to-use tools, enhancing panel composition with human factors expertise, promoting an organization-wide safety culture to staff and aggregating analysis of incidents as possible improvement actions. BioMed Central 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7275338/ /pubmed/32503514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05356-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kwok, Yick Ting A
Mah, Alastair PY
Pang, Katherine MC
Our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals
title Our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals
title_full Our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals
title_fullStr Our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals
title_short Our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals
title_sort our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in hong kong public hospitals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32503514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05356-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kwokyicktinga ourfirstreviewanevaluationofeffectivenessofrootcauseanalysisrecommendationsinhongkongpublichospitals
AT mahalastairpy ourfirstreviewanevaluationofeffectivenessofrootcauseanalysisrecommendationsinhongkongpublichospitals
AT pangkatherinemc ourfirstreviewanevaluationofeffectivenessofrootcauseanalysisrecommendationsinhongkongpublichospitals