Cargando…

Comparison of three Agrobacterium-mediated co-transformation methods for generating marker-free transgenic Brassica napus plants

BACKGROUND: Generation of marker-free transgenic plants is very important to the regulatory permission and commercial release of transgenic crops. Co-transformation methods that enable the removal of selectable marker genes have been extensively used because they are simple and clean. Few comparison...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Fang, Wang, Pandi, Xiong, Xiaojuan, Fu, Ping, Gao, Hongfei, Ding, Xinhua, Wu, Gang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-020-00628-y
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Generation of marker-free transgenic plants is very important to the regulatory permission and commercial release of transgenic crops. Co-transformation methods that enable the removal of selectable marker genes have been extensively used because they are simple and clean. Few comparisons are currently available between different strain/plasmid co-transformation systems, and also data are related to variation in co-transformation frequencies caused by other details of the vector design. RESULTS: In this study, we constructed three vector systems for the co-transformation of allotetraploid Brassica napus (B. napus) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and compared these co-transformation methods. We tested a mixed-strain system, in which a single T-DNA is harbored in two plasmids, as well as two “double T-DNA” vector systems, in which two independent T-DNAs are harbored in one plasmid in a tandem orientation or in an inverted orientation. As confirmed by the use of PCR analysis, test strips, and Southern blot, the average co-transformation frequencies from these systems ranged from 24 to 81% in T(0) plants, with the highest frequency of 81% for 1:1 treatment of the mixed-strain system. These vector systems are valuable for generating marker-free transgenic B. napus plants, and marker-free plants were successfully obtained in the T(1) generation from 50 to 77% of T(0) transgenic lines using these systems, with the highest frequency of 77% for “double T-DNA” vector systems of pBID RT Enhanced. We further found that marker-free B. napus plants were more frequently encountered in the progeny of transgenic lines which has only one or two marker gene copies in the T(0) generation. Two types of herbicide resistant transgenic B. napus plants, Bar(+) with phosphinothricin resistance and Bar(+)EPSPS(+)GOX(+) with phosphinothricin and glyphosate resistance, were obtained. CONCLUSION: We were successful in removing selectable marker genes in transgenic B. napus plants using all three co-transformation systems developed in this study. It was proved that if a appropriate mole ratio was designed for the specific length ratio of the twin T-DNAs for the mixed-strain method, high unlinked co-insertion frequency and overall success frequency could be achieved. Our study provides useful information for the construction of efficient co-transformation system for marker-free transgenic crop production and developed transgenic B. napus with various types of herbicide resistance.