Cargando…

Effectiveness of fetal scalp stimulation test in assessing fetal wellbeing during labor, a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: It is discussed whether fetal scalp stimulation (FSS) test is a reliable complimentary tool to cardiotocography (CTG) to assess fetal wellbeing during labor. The test is based on the assumption that a well-oxygenated fetus, in contrast to the depressed fetus, will respond to a certain st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shakouri, Farzaneh, Iorizzo, Linda, Edwards, Hellen Mc Kinnon, Vinter, Christina Anne, Kristensen, Karl, Isberg, Per-Erik, Wiberg, Nana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32503518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03030-7
_version_ 1783542813603921920
author Shakouri, Farzaneh
Iorizzo, Linda
Edwards, Hellen Mc Kinnon
Vinter, Christina Anne
Kristensen, Karl
Isberg, Per-Erik
Wiberg, Nana
author_facet Shakouri, Farzaneh
Iorizzo, Linda
Edwards, Hellen Mc Kinnon
Vinter, Christina Anne
Kristensen, Karl
Isberg, Per-Erik
Wiberg, Nana
author_sort Shakouri, Farzaneh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is discussed whether fetal scalp stimulation (FSS) test is a reliable complimentary tool to cardiotocography (CTG) to assess fetal wellbeing during labor. The test is based on the assumption that a well-oxygenated fetus, in contrast to the depressed fetus, will respond to a certain stimulus. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the FSS-test. METHODS: A retrospective observational study carried out Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark. Laboring women with singleton pregnancies in cephalic presentation after gestation week 33 and indication for fetal blood sampling (FBS) were eligible for inclusion. The FSS-test was classified as positive when an acceleration was absent at the time of FBS and negative when an acceleration was present. Lactate in scalp blood was measured by the point-of-care device LactatePro™ and pH in artery umbilical cord blood by the stationary blood gas analyzer ABL800. Lactate level < 4.2 mmol/L in scalp blood and arterial cord pH > 7.1 were cut-offs for normality. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-five women were included. The cohort was divided by the FBS-to-delivery time: Group 1 (n = 128) ≤ 20 min, Group 2 (n = 117) 21–59 min and Group 3 (n = 140) ≥ 60 min. The proportion of FSS-positive tests differed significantly between the groups (p < 0.000). In Group 1 the sensitivity, specificity and likelihoods for scalp lactate ≥4.2 mmol/L were 81.5 (95% CI 67–90.1), 13.3 18.5 (95% CI 5.9–24.6), LHR+ 0.94 (95% CI 0.8–1.1) and LHR – 1.4 (95% CI 0.6–3.2) and for umbilical artery pH ≤ 7.10 the values were 82.6% (95% CI 61.2–95.1), 16% (95% CI 9.4–24.7), 1.0 (95% CI 0.8–1.2) and 1.1 (95% CI 0.4–3) respectively. Regardless of the FBS-to-delivery time the LHR+ for lactate ≥4.2 mmol/L increased to 1.38 (95% CI 1.2–1.6). CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of scalp stimulation test was poor for both ruling in and out fetal hypoxia during labor. Absence of a provoked acceleration seems to be a normal phenomenon in the second stage of labor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7275571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72755712020-06-08 Effectiveness of fetal scalp stimulation test in assessing fetal wellbeing during labor, a retrospective cohort study Shakouri, Farzaneh Iorizzo, Linda Edwards, Hellen Mc Kinnon Vinter, Christina Anne Kristensen, Karl Isberg, Per-Erik Wiberg, Nana BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: It is discussed whether fetal scalp stimulation (FSS) test is a reliable complimentary tool to cardiotocography (CTG) to assess fetal wellbeing during labor. The test is based on the assumption that a well-oxygenated fetus, in contrast to the depressed fetus, will respond to a certain stimulus. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the FSS-test. METHODS: A retrospective observational study carried out Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark. Laboring women with singleton pregnancies in cephalic presentation after gestation week 33 and indication for fetal blood sampling (FBS) were eligible for inclusion. The FSS-test was classified as positive when an acceleration was absent at the time of FBS and negative when an acceleration was present. Lactate in scalp blood was measured by the point-of-care device LactatePro™ and pH in artery umbilical cord blood by the stationary blood gas analyzer ABL800. Lactate level < 4.2 mmol/L in scalp blood and arterial cord pH > 7.1 were cut-offs for normality. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-five women were included. The cohort was divided by the FBS-to-delivery time: Group 1 (n = 128) ≤ 20 min, Group 2 (n = 117) 21–59 min and Group 3 (n = 140) ≥ 60 min. The proportion of FSS-positive tests differed significantly between the groups (p < 0.000). In Group 1 the sensitivity, specificity and likelihoods for scalp lactate ≥4.2 mmol/L were 81.5 (95% CI 67–90.1), 13.3 18.5 (95% CI 5.9–24.6), LHR+ 0.94 (95% CI 0.8–1.1) and LHR – 1.4 (95% CI 0.6–3.2) and for umbilical artery pH ≤ 7.10 the values were 82.6% (95% CI 61.2–95.1), 16% (95% CI 9.4–24.7), 1.0 (95% CI 0.8–1.2) and 1.1 (95% CI 0.4–3) respectively. Regardless of the FBS-to-delivery time the LHR+ for lactate ≥4.2 mmol/L increased to 1.38 (95% CI 1.2–1.6). CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of scalp stimulation test was poor for both ruling in and out fetal hypoxia during labor. Absence of a provoked acceleration seems to be a normal phenomenon in the second stage of labor. BioMed Central 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7275571/ /pubmed/32503518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03030-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shakouri, Farzaneh
Iorizzo, Linda
Edwards, Hellen Mc Kinnon
Vinter, Christina Anne
Kristensen, Karl
Isberg, Per-Erik
Wiberg, Nana
Effectiveness of fetal scalp stimulation test in assessing fetal wellbeing during labor, a retrospective cohort study
title Effectiveness of fetal scalp stimulation test in assessing fetal wellbeing during labor, a retrospective cohort study
title_full Effectiveness of fetal scalp stimulation test in assessing fetal wellbeing during labor, a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of fetal scalp stimulation test in assessing fetal wellbeing during labor, a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of fetal scalp stimulation test in assessing fetal wellbeing during labor, a retrospective cohort study
title_short Effectiveness of fetal scalp stimulation test in assessing fetal wellbeing during labor, a retrospective cohort study
title_sort effectiveness of fetal scalp stimulation test in assessing fetal wellbeing during labor, a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32503518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03030-7
work_keys_str_mv AT shakourifarzaneh effectivenessoffetalscalpstimulationtestinassessingfetalwellbeingduringlaboraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT iorizzolinda effectivenessoffetalscalpstimulationtestinassessingfetalwellbeingduringlaboraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT edwardshellenmckinnon effectivenessoffetalscalpstimulationtestinassessingfetalwellbeingduringlaboraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT vinterchristinaanne effectivenessoffetalscalpstimulationtestinassessingfetalwellbeingduringlaboraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kristensenkarl effectivenessoffetalscalpstimulationtestinassessingfetalwellbeingduringlaboraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT isbergpererik effectivenessoffetalscalpstimulationtestinassessingfetalwellbeingduringlaboraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wibergnana effectivenessoffetalscalpstimulationtestinassessingfetalwellbeingduringlaboraretrospectivecohortstudy