Cargando…
A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements
The mechanical phenotype of a cell is an inherent biophysical marker of its state and function, with potential value in clinical diagnostics. Several microfluidic-based methods developed in recent years have enabled single-cell mechanophenotyping at throughputs comparable to flow cytometery. Here we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0818-8 |
_version_ | 1783542857374629888 |
---|---|
author | Urbanska, Marta Muñoz, Hector E. Bagnall, Josephine Shaw Otto, Oliver Manalis, Scott R. Di Carlo, Dino Guck, Jochen |
author_facet | Urbanska, Marta Muñoz, Hector E. Bagnall, Josephine Shaw Otto, Oliver Manalis, Scott R. Di Carlo, Dino Guck, Jochen |
author_sort | Urbanska, Marta |
collection | PubMed |
description | The mechanical phenotype of a cell is an inherent biophysical marker of its state and function, with potential value in clinical diagnostics. Several microfluidic-based methods developed in recent years have enabled single-cell mechanophenotyping at throughputs comparable to flow cytometery. Here we present a highly standardized cross-laboratory study comparing three leading microfluidic-based approaches to measure cell mechanical phenotype: constriction-based deformability cytometry (cDC), shear flow deformability cytometry (sDC), and extensional flow deformability cytometry (xDC). We show that all three methods detect cell deformability changes induced by exposure to altered osmolarity. However, a dose-dependent deformability increase upon latrunculin B-induced actin disassembly was detected only with cDC and sDC, which suggests that when exposing cells to the higher strain rate imposed by xDC, other cell components dominate the response. The direct comparison presented here serves to unify deformability cytometry methods and provides context for the interpretation of deformability measurements performed using different platforms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7275893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72758932020-10-27 A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements Urbanska, Marta Muñoz, Hector E. Bagnall, Josephine Shaw Otto, Oliver Manalis, Scott R. Di Carlo, Dino Guck, Jochen Nat Methods Article The mechanical phenotype of a cell is an inherent biophysical marker of its state and function, with potential value in clinical diagnostics. Several microfluidic-based methods developed in recent years have enabled single-cell mechanophenotyping at throughputs comparable to flow cytometery. Here we present a highly standardized cross-laboratory study comparing three leading microfluidic-based approaches to measure cell mechanical phenotype: constriction-based deformability cytometry (cDC), shear flow deformability cytometry (sDC), and extensional flow deformability cytometry (xDC). We show that all three methods detect cell deformability changes induced by exposure to altered osmolarity. However, a dose-dependent deformability increase upon latrunculin B-induced actin disassembly was detected only with cDC and sDC, which suggests that when exposing cells to the higher strain rate imposed by xDC, other cell components dominate the response. The direct comparison presented here serves to unify deformability cytometry methods and provides context for the interpretation of deformability measurements performed using different platforms. 2020-04-27 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7275893/ /pubmed/32341544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0818-8 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Urbanska, Marta Muñoz, Hector E. Bagnall, Josephine Shaw Otto, Oliver Manalis, Scott R. Di Carlo, Dino Guck, Jochen A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements |
title | A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements |
title_full | A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements |
title_fullStr | A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements |
title_short | A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements |
title_sort | comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0818-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT urbanskamarta acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements AT munozhectore acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements AT bagnalljosephineshaw acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements AT ottooliver acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements AT manalisscottr acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements AT dicarlodino acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements AT guckjochen acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements AT urbanskamarta comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements AT munozhectore comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements AT bagnalljosephineshaw comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements AT ottooliver comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements AT manalisscottr comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements AT dicarlodino comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements AT guckjochen comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements |