Cargando…

A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements

The mechanical phenotype of a cell is an inherent biophysical marker of its state and function, with potential value in clinical diagnostics. Several microfluidic-based methods developed in recent years have enabled single-cell mechanophenotyping at throughputs comparable to flow cytometery. Here we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Urbanska, Marta, Muñoz, Hector E., Bagnall, Josephine Shaw, Otto, Oliver, Manalis, Scott R., Di Carlo, Dino, Guck, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0818-8
_version_ 1783542857374629888
author Urbanska, Marta
Muñoz, Hector E.
Bagnall, Josephine Shaw
Otto, Oliver
Manalis, Scott R.
Di Carlo, Dino
Guck, Jochen
author_facet Urbanska, Marta
Muñoz, Hector E.
Bagnall, Josephine Shaw
Otto, Oliver
Manalis, Scott R.
Di Carlo, Dino
Guck, Jochen
author_sort Urbanska, Marta
collection PubMed
description The mechanical phenotype of a cell is an inherent biophysical marker of its state and function, with potential value in clinical diagnostics. Several microfluidic-based methods developed in recent years have enabled single-cell mechanophenotyping at throughputs comparable to flow cytometery. Here we present a highly standardized cross-laboratory study comparing three leading microfluidic-based approaches to measure cell mechanical phenotype: constriction-based deformability cytometry (cDC), shear flow deformability cytometry (sDC), and extensional flow deformability cytometry (xDC). We show that all three methods detect cell deformability changes induced by exposure to altered osmolarity. However, a dose-dependent deformability increase upon latrunculin B-induced actin disassembly was detected only with cDC and sDC, which suggests that when exposing cells to the higher strain rate imposed by xDC, other cell components dominate the response. The direct comparison presented here serves to unify deformability cytometry methods and provides context for the interpretation of deformability measurements performed using different platforms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7275893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72758932020-10-27 A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements Urbanska, Marta Muñoz, Hector E. Bagnall, Josephine Shaw Otto, Oliver Manalis, Scott R. Di Carlo, Dino Guck, Jochen Nat Methods Article The mechanical phenotype of a cell is an inherent biophysical marker of its state and function, with potential value in clinical diagnostics. Several microfluidic-based methods developed in recent years have enabled single-cell mechanophenotyping at throughputs comparable to flow cytometery. Here we present a highly standardized cross-laboratory study comparing three leading microfluidic-based approaches to measure cell mechanical phenotype: constriction-based deformability cytometry (cDC), shear flow deformability cytometry (sDC), and extensional flow deformability cytometry (xDC). We show that all three methods detect cell deformability changes induced by exposure to altered osmolarity. However, a dose-dependent deformability increase upon latrunculin B-induced actin disassembly was detected only with cDC and sDC, which suggests that when exposing cells to the higher strain rate imposed by xDC, other cell components dominate the response. The direct comparison presented here serves to unify deformability cytometry methods and provides context for the interpretation of deformability measurements performed using different platforms. 2020-04-27 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7275893/ /pubmed/32341544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0818-8 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Urbanska, Marta
Muñoz, Hector E.
Bagnall, Josephine Shaw
Otto, Oliver
Manalis, Scott R.
Di Carlo, Dino
Guck, Jochen
A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements
title A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements
title_full A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements
title_fullStr A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements
title_short A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements
title_sort comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0818-8
work_keys_str_mv AT urbanskamarta acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements
AT munozhectore acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements
AT bagnalljosephineshaw acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements
AT ottooliver acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements
AT manalisscottr acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements
AT dicarlodino acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements
AT guckjochen acomparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements
AT urbanskamarta comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements
AT munozhectore comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements
AT bagnalljosephineshaw comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements
AT ottooliver comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements
AT manalisscottr comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements
AT dicarlodino comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements
AT guckjochen comparisonofmicrofluidicmethodsforhighthroughputcelldeformabilitymeasurements