Cargando…
Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the Italian version
BACKGROUND: Difficulties in identifying patients at risk of clinical deterioration or death represent one of the main barriers to Palliative Care (PC) development in the community. Currently, no specific Italian tools aimed at identifying patients with PC needs are available. Of the different Europe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32505197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00584-3 |
_version_ | 1783542891915771904 |
---|---|
author | Casale, Giuseppe Magnani, Caterina Fanelli, Renato Surdo, Laura Goletti, Mauro Boyd, Kirsty D’Angelo, Daniela Mastroianni, Chiara |
author_facet | Casale, Giuseppe Magnani, Caterina Fanelli, Renato Surdo, Laura Goletti, Mauro Boyd, Kirsty D’Angelo, Daniela Mastroianni, Chiara |
author_sort | Casale, Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Difficulties in identifying patients at risk of clinical deterioration or death represent one of the main barriers to Palliative Care (PC) development in the community. Currently, no specific Italian tools aimed at identifying patients with PC needs are available. Of the different European tools available, the SPICT™ can be used easily in any kind of setting and does not include the Surprise Question. The purpose of the study was to translate, cross-culturally adapt and pre-test the Italian version of the SPICT™. METHODS: The Beaton recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of instruments were followed. Content validity was assessed using the Lynn method. A sample of Italian General Practitioners (GPs) assessed the SPICT-IT™ for feasibility and tested it. RESULTS: During the cross-cultural adaptation, some issues regarding semantic, experiential, idiomatic and conceptual equivalences were raised and resolved. The Scale-Content Validity Index/Ave was 0.86. Of the 907 GPs included in the sample, 71 (7.8%) agreed to test the SPICT-IT™ and to assess its feasibility. The participants provided care for 73,526 people in the community. Of these people, 1.7% (N = 1303) were identified as being in need of PC according to the SPICT-IT™. Sixty-six (93.0%) GPs stated they would use the SPICT-IT™ in their daily clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: The SPICT-IT™ demonstrated acceptable content validity. The percentage of patients identified through the SPICT-IT™ was comparable to findings from literature. The next phase of this project will investigate the impact of a proactive training programme aimed at supporting GPs in identifying patients with PC needs and delivering appropriate Primary Palliative Care (PPC). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7276086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72760862020-06-08 Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the Italian version Casale, Giuseppe Magnani, Caterina Fanelli, Renato Surdo, Laura Goletti, Mauro Boyd, Kirsty D’Angelo, Daniela Mastroianni, Chiara BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Difficulties in identifying patients at risk of clinical deterioration or death represent one of the main barriers to Palliative Care (PC) development in the community. Currently, no specific Italian tools aimed at identifying patients with PC needs are available. Of the different European tools available, the SPICT™ can be used easily in any kind of setting and does not include the Surprise Question. The purpose of the study was to translate, cross-culturally adapt and pre-test the Italian version of the SPICT™. METHODS: The Beaton recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of instruments were followed. Content validity was assessed using the Lynn method. A sample of Italian General Practitioners (GPs) assessed the SPICT-IT™ for feasibility and tested it. RESULTS: During the cross-cultural adaptation, some issues regarding semantic, experiential, idiomatic and conceptual equivalences were raised and resolved. The Scale-Content Validity Index/Ave was 0.86. Of the 907 GPs included in the sample, 71 (7.8%) agreed to test the SPICT-IT™ and to assess its feasibility. The participants provided care for 73,526 people in the community. Of these people, 1.7% (N = 1303) were identified as being in need of PC according to the SPICT-IT™. Sixty-six (93.0%) GPs stated they would use the SPICT-IT™ in their daily clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: The SPICT-IT™ demonstrated acceptable content validity. The percentage of patients identified through the SPICT-IT™ was comparable to findings from literature. The next phase of this project will investigate the impact of a proactive training programme aimed at supporting GPs in identifying patients with PC needs and delivering appropriate Primary Palliative Care (PPC). BioMed Central 2020-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7276086/ /pubmed/32505197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00584-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Casale, Giuseppe Magnani, Caterina Fanelli, Renato Surdo, Laura Goletti, Mauro Boyd, Kirsty D’Angelo, Daniela Mastroianni, Chiara Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the Italian version |
title | Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the Italian version |
title_full | Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the Italian version |
title_fullStr | Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the Italian version |
title_full_unstemmed | Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the Italian version |
title_short | Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the Italian version |
title_sort | supportive and palliative care indicators tool (spict™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the italian version |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32505197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00584-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT casalegiuseppe supportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictcontentvalidityfeasibilityandpretestoftheitalianversion AT magnanicaterina supportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictcontentvalidityfeasibilityandpretestoftheitalianversion AT fanellirenato supportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictcontentvalidityfeasibilityandpretestoftheitalianversion AT surdolaura supportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictcontentvalidityfeasibilityandpretestoftheitalianversion AT golettimauro supportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictcontentvalidityfeasibilityandpretestoftheitalianversion AT boydkirsty supportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictcontentvalidityfeasibilityandpretestoftheitalianversion AT dangelodaniela supportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictcontentvalidityfeasibilityandpretestoftheitalianversion AT mastroiannichiara supportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictcontentvalidityfeasibilityandpretestoftheitalianversion AT supportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictcontentvalidityfeasibilityandpretestoftheitalianversion |