Cargando…
The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused enormous psychological impact worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the psychological and mental impact of COVID-19 among healthcare workers, the general population, and patients with higher COVID-19 risk publishe...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32563745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190 |
_version_ | 1783542898676989952 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Min Guo, Lixia Yu, Mingzhou Jiang, Wenying Wang, Haiyan |
author_facet | Luo, Min Guo, Lixia Yu, Mingzhou Jiang, Wenying Wang, Haiyan |
author_sort | Luo, Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused enormous psychological impact worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the psychological and mental impact of COVID-19 among healthcare workers, the general population, and patients with higher COVID-19 risk published between 1 Nov 2019 to 25 May 2020. We conducted literature research using Embase, PubMed, Google scholar and WHO COVID-19 databases. Among the initial search of 9207 studies, 62 studies with 162,639 participants from 17 countries were included in the review. The pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression was 33% (95% confidence interval: 28%-38%) and 28% (23%-32%), respectively. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was the highest among patients with pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 infection (56% [39%-73%] and 55% [48%-62%]), and it was similar between healthcare workers and the general public. Studies from China, Italy, Turkey, Spain and Iran reported higher-than-pooled prevalence among healthcare workers and the general public. Common risk factors included being women, being nurses, having lower socioeconomic status, having high risks of contracting COVID-19, and social isolation. Protective factors included having sufficient medical resources, up-to-date and accurate information, and taking precautionary measures. In conclusion, psychological interventions targeting high-risk populations with heavy psychological distress are in urgent need. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7276119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72761192020-06-08 The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis Luo, Min Guo, Lixia Yu, Mingzhou Jiang, Wenying Wang, Haiyan Psychiatry Res Review Article The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused enormous psychological impact worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the psychological and mental impact of COVID-19 among healthcare workers, the general population, and patients with higher COVID-19 risk published between 1 Nov 2019 to 25 May 2020. We conducted literature research using Embase, PubMed, Google scholar and WHO COVID-19 databases. Among the initial search of 9207 studies, 62 studies with 162,639 participants from 17 countries were included in the review. The pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression was 33% (95% confidence interval: 28%-38%) and 28% (23%-32%), respectively. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was the highest among patients with pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 infection (56% [39%-73%] and 55% [48%-62%]), and it was similar between healthcare workers and the general public. Studies from China, Italy, Turkey, Spain and Iran reported higher-than-pooled prevalence among healthcare workers and the general public. Common risk factors included being women, being nurses, having lower socioeconomic status, having high risks of contracting COVID-19, and social isolation. Protective factors included having sufficient medical resources, up-to-date and accurate information, and taking precautionary measures. In conclusion, psychological interventions targeting high-risk populations with heavy psychological distress are in urgent need. Elsevier B.V. 2020-09 2020-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7276119/ /pubmed/32563745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Luo, Min Guo, Lixia Yu, Mingzhou Jiang, Wenying Wang, Haiyan The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) on medical staff and general public – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32563745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luomin thepsychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guolixia thepsychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yumingzhou thepsychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiangwenying thepsychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanghaiyan thepsychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luomin psychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guolixia psychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yumingzhou psychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiangwenying psychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanghaiyan psychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |