Cargando…

The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused enormous psychological impact worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the psychological and mental impact of COVID-19 among healthcare workers, the general population, and patients with higher COVID-19 risk publishe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Min, Guo, Lixia, Yu, Mingzhou, Jiang, Wenying, Wang, Haiyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32563745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190
_version_ 1783542898676989952
author Luo, Min
Guo, Lixia
Yu, Mingzhou
Jiang, Wenying
Wang, Haiyan
author_facet Luo, Min
Guo, Lixia
Yu, Mingzhou
Jiang, Wenying
Wang, Haiyan
author_sort Luo, Min
collection PubMed
description The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused enormous psychological impact worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the psychological and mental impact of COVID-19 among healthcare workers, the general population, and patients with higher COVID-19 risk published between 1 Nov 2019 to 25 May 2020. We conducted literature research using Embase, PubMed, Google scholar and WHO COVID-19 databases. Among the initial search of 9207 studies, 62 studies with 162,639 participants from 17 countries were included in the review. The pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression was 33% (95% confidence interval: 28%-38%) and 28% (23%-32%), respectively. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was the highest among patients with pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 infection (56% [39%-73%] and 55% [48%-62%]), and it was similar between healthcare workers and the general public. Studies from China, Italy, Turkey, Spain and Iran reported higher-than-pooled prevalence among healthcare workers and the general public. Common risk factors included being women, being nurses, having lower socioeconomic status, having high risks of contracting COVID-19, and social isolation. Protective factors included having sufficient medical resources, up-to-date and accurate information, and taking precautionary measures. In conclusion, psychological interventions targeting high-risk populations with heavy psychological distress are in urgent need.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7276119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72761192020-06-08 The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis Luo, Min Guo, Lixia Yu, Mingzhou Jiang, Wenying Wang, Haiyan Psychiatry Res Review Article The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused enormous psychological impact worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the psychological and mental impact of COVID-19 among healthcare workers, the general population, and patients with higher COVID-19 risk published between 1 Nov 2019 to 25 May 2020. We conducted literature research using Embase, PubMed, Google scholar and WHO COVID-19 databases. Among the initial search of 9207 studies, 62 studies with 162,639 participants from 17 countries were included in the review. The pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression was 33% (95% confidence interval: 28%-38%) and 28% (23%-32%), respectively. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was the highest among patients with pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 infection (56% [39%-73%] and 55% [48%-62%]), and it was similar between healthcare workers and the general public. Studies from China, Italy, Turkey, Spain and Iran reported higher-than-pooled prevalence among healthcare workers and the general public. Common risk factors included being women, being nurses, having lower socioeconomic status, having high risks of contracting COVID-19, and social isolation. Protective factors included having sufficient medical resources, up-to-date and accurate information, and taking precautionary measures. In conclusion, psychological interventions targeting high-risk populations with heavy psychological distress are in urgent need. Elsevier B.V. 2020-09 2020-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7276119/ /pubmed/32563745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review Article
Luo, Min
Guo, Lixia
Yu, Mingzhou
Jiang, Wenying
Wang, Haiyan
The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis
title The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) on medical staff and general public – a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32563745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190
work_keys_str_mv AT luomin thepsychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guolixia thepsychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yumingzhou thepsychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangwenying thepsychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanghaiyan thepsychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luomin psychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guolixia psychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yumingzhou psychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangwenying psychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanghaiyan psychologicalandmentalimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19onmedicalstaffandgeneralpublicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis