Cargando…

The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive decline and dementia significantly affect independence and quality of life in older adults; therefore, it is critical to identify effective cognition‐oriented treatments (COTs; eg, cognitive training, rehabilitation) that can help maintain or enhance cognitive functioning in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simon, Sharon Sanz, Castellani, Mary, Belleville, Sylvie, Dwolatzky, Tzvi, Hampstead, Benjamin M., Bahar‐Fuchs, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12024
_version_ 1783542914399338496
author Simon, Sharon Sanz
Castellani, Mary
Belleville, Sylvie
Dwolatzky, Tzvi
Hampstead, Benjamin M.
Bahar‐Fuchs, Alex
author_facet Simon, Sharon Sanz
Castellani, Mary
Belleville, Sylvie
Dwolatzky, Tzvi
Hampstead, Benjamin M.
Bahar‐Fuchs, Alex
author_sort Simon, Sharon Sanz
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cognitive decline and dementia significantly affect independence and quality of life in older adults; therefore, it is critical to identify effective cognition‐oriented treatments (COTs; eg, cognitive training, rehabilitation) that can help maintain or enhance cognitive functioning in older adults, as well as reduce dementia risk or alleviate symptoms associated with pathological processes. METHODS: The Cognitive Intervention Design Evaluation and Reporting (CIDER), a working group from the Non‐Pharmacological Interventions Professional Interest Area (NPI‐PIA) of the Alzheimer's Association conducted as survey in 2017 with experts in COTs worldwide. The survey's aims were three‐fold: (1) determine the common attitudes, beliefs, and practices of experts involved in the COTs research targeting older people; (2) identify areas of relative agreement and disagreement among experts in the field; and (3) offer a critical review of the literature, including recommendations for future research. RESULTS: The survey identified several areas of agreements among experts on critical features of COTs, and on study design and outcome measures. Nevertheless, there were some areas with relative disagreement. Critically, expert opinions were not always supported by scientific evidence, suggesting that methodologic improvements are needed regarding design, implementation, and reporting of COTs. There was a clear consensus that COTs provide benefits and should be offered to cognitively unimpaired older adults, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and mild dementia, but opinions differed for moderate and severe dementia. In addition, there is no consensus on the potential role of COTs in dementia prevention, indicating that future research should prioritize this aspect. DISCUSSION: Evidence of COTs in older adults is encouraging, but additional evidence is needed to enhance dementia prevention. Consensus building and guidelines in the field are critical to improve and accelerate the development of high‐quality evidence for COTs in cognitively unimpaired older adults, and those with MCI and dementia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7276188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72761882020-06-09 The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts Simon, Sharon Sanz Castellani, Mary Belleville, Sylvie Dwolatzky, Tzvi Hampstead, Benjamin M. Bahar‐Fuchs, Alex Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Review Articles INTRODUCTION: Cognitive decline and dementia significantly affect independence and quality of life in older adults; therefore, it is critical to identify effective cognition‐oriented treatments (COTs; eg, cognitive training, rehabilitation) that can help maintain or enhance cognitive functioning in older adults, as well as reduce dementia risk or alleviate symptoms associated with pathological processes. METHODS: The Cognitive Intervention Design Evaluation and Reporting (CIDER), a working group from the Non‐Pharmacological Interventions Professional Interest Area (NPI‐PIA) of the Alzheimer's Association conducted as survey in 2017 with experts in COTs worldwide. The survey's aims were three‐fold: (1) determine the common attitudes, beliefs, and practices of experts involved in the COTs research targeting older people; (2) identify areas of relative agreement and disagreement among experts in the field; and (3) offer a critical review of the literature, including recommendations for future research. RESULTS: The survey identified several areas of agreements among experts on critical features of COTs, and on study design and outcome measures. Nevertheless, there were some areas with relative disagreement. Critically, expert opinions were not always supported by scientific evidence, suggesting that methodologic improvements are needed regarding design, implementation, and reporting of COTs. There was a clear consensus that COTs provide benefits and should be offered to cognitively unimpaired older adults, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and mild dementia, but opinions differed for moderate and severe dementia. In addition, there is no consensus on the potential role of COTs in dementia prevention, indicating that future research should prioritize this aspect. DISCUSSION: Evidence of COTs in older adults is encouraging, but additional evidence is needed to enhance dementia prevention. Consensus building and guidelines in the field are critical to improve and accelerate the development of high‐quality evidence for COTs in cognitively unimpaired older adults, and those with MCI and dementia. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7276188/ /pubmed/32523978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12024 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Alzheimer's Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Simon, Sharon Sanz
Castellani, Mary
Belleville, Sylvie
Dwolatzky, Tzvi
Hampstead, Benjamin M.
Bahar‐Fuchs, Alex
The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts
title The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts
title_full The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts
title_fullStr The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts
title_full_unstemmed The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts
title_short The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts
title_sort design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: results of a survey of experts
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12024
work_keys_str_mv AT simonsharonsanz thedesignevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts
AT castellanimary thedesignevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts
AT bellevillesylvie thedesignevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts
AT dwolatzkytzvi thedesignevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts
AT hampsteadbenjaminm thedesignevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts
AT baharfuchsalex thedesignevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts
AT simonsharonsanz designevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts
AT castellanimary designevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts
AT bellevillesylvie designevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts
AT dwolatzkytzvi designevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts
AT hampsteadbenjaminm designevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts
AT baharfuchsalex designevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts