Cargando…
The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts
INTRODUCTION: Cognitive decline and dementia significantly affect independence and quality of life in older adults; therefore, it is critical to identify effective cognition‐oriented treatments (COTs; eg, cognitive training, rehabilitation) that can help maintain or enhance cognitive functioning in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12024 |
_version_ | 1783542914399338496 |
---|---|
author | Simon, Sharon Sanz Castellani, Mary Belleville, Sylvie Dwolatzky, Tzvi Hampstead, Benjamin M. Bahar‐Fuchs, Alex |
author_facet | Simon, Sharon Sanz Castellani, Mary Belleville, Sylvie Dwolatzky, Tzvi Hampstead, Benjamin M. Bahar‐Fuchs, Alex |
author_sort | Simon, Sharon Sanz |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Cognitive decline and dementia significantly affect independence and quality of life in older adults; therefore, it is critical to identify effective cognition‐oriented treatments (COTs; eg, cognitive training, rehabilitation) that can help maintain or enhance cognitive functioning in older adults, as well as reduce dementia risk or alleviate symptoms associated with pathological processes. METHODS: The Cognitive Intervention Design Evaluation and Reporting (CIDER), a working group from the Non‐Pharmacological Interventions Professional Interest Area (NPI‐PIA) of the Alzheimer's Association conducted as survey in 2017 with experts in COTs worldwide. The survey's aims were three‐fold: (1) determine the common attitudes, beliefs, and practices of experts involved in the COTs research targeting older people; (2) identify areas of relative agreement and disagreement among experts in the field; and (3) offer a critical review of the literature, including recommendations for future research. RESULTS: The survey identified several areas of agreements among experts on critical features of COTs, and on study design and outcome measures. Nevertheless, there were some areas with relative disagreement. Critically, expert opinions were not always supported by scientific evidence, suggesting that methodologic improvements are needed regarding design, implementation, and reporting of COTs. There was a clear consensus that COTs provide benefits and should be offered to cognitively unimpaired older adults, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and mild dementia, but opinions differed for moderate and severe dementia. In addition, there is no consensus on the potential role of COTs in dementia prevention, indicating that future research should prioritize this aspect. DISCUSSION: Evidence of COTs in older adults is encouraging, but additional evidence is needed to enhance dementia prevention. Consensus building and guidelines in the field are critical to improve and accelerate the development of high‐quality evidence for COTs in cognitively unimpaired older adults, and those with MCI and dementia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7276188 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72761882020-06-09 The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts Simon, Sharon Sanz Castellani, Mary Belleville, Sylvie Dwolatzky, Tzvi Hampstead, Benjamin M. Bahar‐Fuchs, Alex Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Review Articles INTRODUCTION: Cognitive decline and dementia significantly affect independence and quality of life in older adults; therefore, it is critical to identify effective cognition‐oriented treatments (COTs; eg, cognitive training, rehabilitation) that can help maintain or enhance cognitive functioning in older adults, as well as reduce dementia risk or alleviate symptoms associated with pathological processes. METHODS: The Cognitive Intervention Design Evaluation and Reporting (CIDER), a working group from the Non‐Pharmacological Interventions Professional Interest Area (NPI‐PIA) of the Alzheimer's Association conducted as survey in 2017 with experts in COTs worldwide. The survey's aims were three‐fold: (1) determine the common attitudes, beliefs, and practices of experts involved in the COTs research targeting older people; (2) identify areas of relative agreement and disagreement among experts in the field; and (3) offer a critical review of the literature, including recommendations for future research. RESULTS: The survey identified several areas of agreements among experts on critical features of COTs, and on study design and outcome measures. Nevertheless, there were some areas with relative disagreement. Critically, expert opinions were not always supported by scientific evidence, suggesting that methodologic improvements are needed regarding design, implementation, and reporting of COTs. There was a clear consensus that COTs provide benefits and should be offered to cognitively unimpaired older adults, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and mild dementia, but opinions differed for moderate and severe dementia. In addition, there is no consensus on the potential role of COTs in dementia prevention, indicating that future research should prioritize this aspect. DISCUSSION: Evidence of COTs in older adults is encouraging, but additional evidence is needed to enhance dementia prevention. Consensus building and guidelines in the field are critical to improve and accelerate the development of high‐quality evidence for COTs in cognitively unimpaired older adults, and those with MCI and dementia. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7276188/ /pubmed/32523978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12024 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Alzheimer's Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Simon, Sharon Sanz Castellani, Mary Belleville, Sylvie Dwolatzky, Tzvi Hampstead, Benjamin M. Bahar‐Fuchs, Alex The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts |
title | The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts |
title_full | The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts |
title_fullStr | The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts |
title_full_unstemmed | The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts |
title_short | The design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts |
title_sort | design, evaluation, and reporting on non‐pharmacological, cognition‐oriented treatments for older adults: results of a survey of experts |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simonsharonsanz thedesignevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts AT castellanimary thedesignevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts AT bellevillesylvie thedesignevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts AT dwolatzkytzvi thedesignevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts AT hampsteadbenjaminm thedesignevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts AT baharfuchsalex thedesignevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts AT simonsharonsanz designevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts AT castellanimary designevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts AT bellevillesylvie designevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts AT dwolatzkytzvi designevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts AT hampsteadbenjaminm designevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts AT baharfuchsalex designevaluationandreportingonnonpharmacologicalcognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsresultsofasurveyofexperts |