Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe and assess the literature on mobile health (mHealth) and other technology-based HIV testing interventions published in the 5-year period from 2015 to 2020. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 18 published technology-based studies, 6 of which we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32507984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00506-1 |
_version_ | 1783542926306967552 |
---|---|
author | Horvath, Keith J. Walker, Teresa Mireles, Linda Bauermeister, Jose A. Hightow-Weidman, Lisa Stephenson, Rob |
author_facet | Horvath, Keith J. Walker, Teresa Mireles, Linda Bauermeister, Jose A. Hightow-Weidman, Lisa Stephenson, Rob |
author_sort | Horvath, Keith J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe and assess the literature on mobile health (mHealth) and other technology-based HIV testing interventions published in the 5-year period from 2015 to 2020. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 18 published technology-based studies, 6 of which were efficacy trials and the remaining 12 were either pilot randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental studies. Most (n = 10) interventions were conducted outside the USA, including countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (n = 4), China (n = 3), Latin America (n = 2), and India (n = 1). All efficacy trials showed some evidence of efficacy, although uptake of HIV testing was low among in intervention trials that consisted of a low number of text messages. Most pilot RCTs demonstrated high levels of feasibility and acceptability, as well as some evidence that the intervention participants benefited more than the control group. Many non-randomized trials similarly reported positive appraisal by study participants. Recommendations for future research and practice by the authors of the studies reviewed here are summarized. SUMMARY: Technology-assisted HIV testing interventions may be an important strategy to reach national and global targets for HIV status awareness in the general population and for most at-risk groups. Although there appears to be growing evidence of their benefit, questions linger regarding how to leverage existing social media platforms to promote HIV testing, which interventions work for what populations, and best practices for scaling up mHealth and other technology-based interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7276280 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72762802020-06-08 A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions Horvath, Keith J. Walker, Teresa Mireles, Linda Bauermeister, Jose A. Hightow-Weidman, Lisa Stephenson, Rob Curr HIV/AIDS Rep Behavioral-Bio-Medical Interface (RJ DiClemente and JL Brown, Section Editors) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe and assess the literature on mobile health (mHealth) and other technology-based HIV testing interventions published in the 5-year period from 2015 to 2020. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 18 published technology-based studies, 6 of which were efficacy trials and the remaining 12 were either pilot randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental studies. Most (n = 10) interventions were conducted outside the USA, including countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (n = 4), China (n = 3), Latin America (n = 2), and India (n = 1). All efficacy trials showed some evidence of efficacy, although uptake of HIV testing was low among in intervention trials that consisted of a low number of text messages. Most pilot RCTs demonstrated high levels of feasibility and acceptability, as well as some evidence that the intervention participants benefited more than the control group. Many non-randomized trials similarly reported positive appraisal by study participants. Recommendations for future research and practice by the authors of the studies reviewed here are summarized. SUMMARY: Technology-assisted HIV testing interventions may be an important strategy to reach national and global targets for HIV status awareness in the general population and for most at-risk groups. Although there appears to be growing evidence of their benefit, questions linger regarding how to leverage existing social media platforms to promote HIV testing, which interventions work for what populations, and best practices for scaling up mHealth and other technology-based interventions. Springer US 2020-06-08 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7276280/ /pubmed/32507984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00506-1 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Behavioral-Bio-Medical Interface (RJ DiClemente and JL Brown, Section Editors) Horvath, Keith J. Walker, Teresa Mireles, Linda Bauermeister, Jose A. Hightow-Weidman, Lisa Stephenson, Rob A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions |
title | A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions |
title_sort | systematic review of technology-assisted hiv testing interventions |
topic | Behavioral-Bio-Medical Interface (RJ DiClemente and JL Brown, Section Editors) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32507984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00506-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horvathkeithj asystematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions AT walkerteresa asystematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions AT mireleslinda asystematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions AT bauermeisterjosea asystematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions AT hightowweidmanlisa asystematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions AT stephensonrob asystematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions AT horvathkeithj systematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions AT walkerteresa systematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions AT mireleslinda systematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions AT bauermeisterjosea systematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions AT hightowweidmanlisa systematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions AT stephensonrob systematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions |