Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe and assess the literature on mobile health (mHealth) and other technology-based HIV testing interventions published in the 5-year period from 2015 to 2020. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 18 published technology-based studies, 6 of which we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horvath, Keith J., Walker, Teresa, Mireles, Linda, Bauermeister, Jose A., Hightow-Weidman, Lisa, Stephenson, Rob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32507984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00506-1
_version_ 1783542926306967552
author Horvath, Keith J.
Walker, Teresa
Mireles, Linda
Bauermeister, Jose A.
Hightow-Weidman, Lisa
Stephenson, Rob
author_facet Horvath, Keith J.
Walker, Teresa
Mireles, Linda
Bauermeister, Jose A.
Hightow-Weidman, Lisa
Stephenson, Rob
author_sort Horvath, Keith J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe and assess the literature on mobile health (mHealth) and other technology-based HIV testing interventions published in the 5-year period from 2015 to 2020. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 18 published technology-based studies, 6 of which were efficacy trials and the remaining 12 were either pilot randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental studies. Most (n = 10) interventions were conducted outside the USA, including countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (n = 4), China (n = 3), Latin America (n = 2), and India (n = 1). All efficacy trials showed some evidence of efficacy, although uptake of HIV testing was low among in intervention trials that consisted of a low number of text messages. Most pilot RCTs demonstrated high levels of feasibility and acceptability, as well as some evidence that the intervention participants benefited more than the control group. Many non-randomized trials similarly reported positive appraisal by study participants. Recommendations for future research and practice by the authors of the studies reviewed here are summarized. SUMMARY: Technology-assisted HIV testing interventions may be an important strategy to reach national and global targets for HIV status awareness in the general population and for most at-risk groups. Although there appears to be growing evidence of their benefit, questions linger regarding how to leverage existing social media platforms to promote HIV testing, which interventions work for what populations, and best practices for scaling up mHealth and other technology-based interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7276280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72762802020-06-08 A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions Horvath, Keith J. Walker, Teresa Mireles, Linda Bauermeister, Jose A. Hightow-Weidman, Lisa Stephenson, Rob Curr HIV/AIDS Rep Behavioral-Bio-Medical Interface (RJ DiClemente and JL Brown, Section Editors) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe and assess the literature on mobile health (mHealth) and other technology-based HIV testing interventions published in the 5-year period from 2015 to 2020. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 18 published technology-based studies, 6 of which were efficacy trials and the remaining 12 were either pilot randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental studies. Most (n = 10) interventions were conducted outside the USA, including countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (n = 4), China (n = 3), Latin America (n = 2), and India (n = 1). All efficacy trials showed some evidence of efficacy, although uptake of HIV testing was low among in intervention trials that consisted of a low number of text messages. Most pilot RCTs demonstrated high levels of feasibility and acceptability, as well as some evidence that the intervention participants benefited more than the control group. Many non-randomized trials similarly reported positive appraisal by study participants. Recommendations for future research and practice by the authors of the studies reviewed here are summarized. SUMMARY: Technology-assisted HIV testing interventions may be an important strategy to reach national and global targets for HIV status awareness in the general population and for most at-risk groups. Although there appears to be growing evidence of their benefit, questions linger regarding how to leverage existing social media platforms to promote HIV testing, which interventions work for what populations, and best practices for scaling up mHealth and other technology-based interventions. Springer US 2020-06-08 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7276280/ /pubmed/32507984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00506-1 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Behavioral-Bio-Medical Interface (RJ DiClemente and JL Brown, Section Editors)
Horvath, Keith J.
Walker, Teresa
Mireles, Linda
Bauermeister, Jose A.
Hightow-Weidman, Lisa
Stephenson, Rob
A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions
title A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions
title_full A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions
title_short A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions
title_sort systematic review of technology-assisted hiv testing interventions
topic Behavioral-Bio-Medical Interface (RJ DiClemente and JL Brown, Section Editors)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32507984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00506-1
work_keys_str_mv AT horvathkeithj asystematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions
AT walkerteresa asystematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions
AT mireleslinda asystematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions
AT bauermeisterjosea asystematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions
AT hightowweidmanlisa asystematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions
AT stephensonrob asystematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions
AT horvathkeithj systematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions
AT walkerteresa systematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions
AT mireleslinda systematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions
AT bauermeisterjosea systematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions
AT hightowweidmanlisa systematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions
AT stephensonrob systematicreviewoftechnologyassistedhivtestinginterventions