Cargando…

Analysis of Patient Preferences in Lung Cancer – Estimating Acceptable Tradeoffs Between Treatment Benefit and Side Effects

OBJECTIVE: Increased treatment options and longer survival for lung cancer have generated increased interest in patient preferences. Previous studies of patient preferences in lung cancer have not fully explored preference heterogeneity. We demonstrate a method to explore preference heterogeneity in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janssen, Ellen M, Dy, Sydney M, Meara, Alexa S, Kneuertz, Peter J, Presley, Carolyn J, Bridges, John F P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32581519
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S235430
_version_ 1783542933118517248
author Janssen, Ellen M
Dy, Sydney M
Meara, Alexa S
Kneuertz, Peter J
Presley, Carolyn J
Bridges, John F P
author_facet Janssen, Ellen M
Dy, Sydney M
Meara, Alexa S
Kneuertz, Peter J
Presley, Carolyn J
Bridges, John F P
author_sort Janssen, Ellen M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Increased treatment options and longer survival for lung cancer have generated increased interest in patient preferences. Previous studies of patient preferences in lung cancer have not fully explored preference heterogeneity. We demonstrate a method to explore preference heterogeneity in the willingness of patients with lung cancer and caregivers to trade progression-free survival (PFS) with side effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients and caregivers attending a national lung cancer meeting completed a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) designed through a collaboration with patients. Participants answered 13 choice tasks described across PFS, short-term side effects, and four long-term side effects. Side effects were coded as a one-level change in severity (none-mild, mild-moderate, or moderate-severe). A mixed logit model in willingness-to-pay space estimated preference heterogeneity in acceptable tradeoffs (time equivalents) between PFS and side effects. The study was reported following quality indicators from the United States Food and Drug Administration’s patient preference guidance. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients and 24 caregivers participated in the DCE. Participants would trade 3.7 month PFS (95% CI (CI): 3.3–4.1) for less severe functional long-term treatment side effects, 2.3 months for less severe physical long-term effects (CI: 1.9–2.8) and cognitive long-term effects (CI: 1.8–2.8), 0.9 months (CI: 0.4–1.4) for less severe emotional long-term effects, and 1.8 months (CI: 1.4–2.3) for less severe short-term side effects. Most participants (90%) would accept treatment with more severe functional long-term effects for 8.4 additional month PFS. CONCLUSION: Participants would trade PFS for changes in short-term side effects and long-term side effects, although preference heterogeneity existed. Lung cancer treatments that offer less PFS but also less severe side effects might be acceptable to some patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7276327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72763272020-06-23 Analysis of Patient Preferences in Lung Cancer – Estimating Acceptable Tradeoffs Between Treatment Benefit and Side Effects Janssen, Ellen M Dy, Sydney M Meara, Alexa S Kneuertz, Peter J Presley, Carolyn J Bridges, John F P Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research OBJECTIVE: Increased treatment options and longer survival for lung cancer have generated increased interest in patient preferences. Previous studies of patient preferences in lung cancer have not fully explored preference heterogeneity. We demonstrate a method to explore preference heterogeneity in the willingness of patients with lung cancer and caregivers to trade progression-free survival (PFS) with side effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients and caregivers attending a national lung cancer meeting completed a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) designed through a collaboration with patients. Participants answered 13 choice tasks described across PFS, short-term side effects, and four long-term side effects. Side effects were coded as a one-level change in severity (none-mild, mild-moderate, or moderate-severe). A mixed logit model in willingness-to-pay space estimated preference heterogeneity in acceptable tradeoffs (time equivalents) between PFS and side effects. The study was reported following quality indicators from the United States Food and Drug Administration’s patient preference guidance. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients and 24 caregivers participated in the DCE. Participants would trade 3.7 month PFS (95% CI (CI): 3.3–4.1) for less severe functional long-term treatment side effects, 2.3 months for less severe physical long-term effects (CI: 1.9–2.8) and cognitive long-term effects (CI: 1.8–2.8), 0.9 months (CI: 0.4–1.4) for less severe emotional long-term effects, and 1.8 months (CI: 1.4–2.3) for less severe short-term side effects. Most participants (90%) would accept treatment with more severe functional long-term effects for 8.4 additional month PFS. CONCLUSION: Participants would trade PFS for changes in short-term side effects and long-term side effects, although preference heterogeneity existed. Lung cancer treatments that offer less PFS but also less severe side effects might be acceptable to some patients. Dove 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7276327/ /pubmed/32581519 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S235430 Text en © 2020 Janssen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Janssen, Ellen M
Dy, Sydney M
Meara, Alexa S
Kneuertz, Peter J
Presley, Carolyn J
Bridges, John F P
Analysis of Patient Preferences in Lung Cancer – Estimating Acceptable Tradeoffs Between Treatment Benefit and Side Effects
title Analysis of Patient Preferences in Lung Cancer – Estimating Acceptable Tradeoffs Between Treatment Benefit and Side Effects
title_full Analysis of Patient Preferences in Lung Cancer – Estimating Acceptable Tradeoffs Between Treatment Benefit and Side Effects
title_fullStr Analysis of Patient Preferences in Lung Cancer – Estimating Acceptable Tradeoffs Between Treatment Benefit and Side Effects
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Patient Preferences in Lung Cancer – Estimating Acceptable Tradeoffs Between Treatment Benefit and Side Effects
title_short Analysis of Patient Preferences in Lung Cancer – Estimating Acceptable Tradeoffs Between Treatment Benefit and Side Effects
title_sort analysis of patient preferences in lung cancer – estimating acceptable tradeoffs between treatment benefit and side effects
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32581519
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S235430
work_keys_str_mv AT janssenellenm analysisofpatientpreferencesinlungcancerestimatingacceptabletradeoffsbetweentreatmentbenefitandsideeffects
AT dysydneym analysisofpatientpreferencesinlungcancerestimatingacceptabletradeoffsbetweentreatmentbenefitandsideeffects
AT mearaalexas analysisofpatientpreferencesinlungcancerestimatingacceptabletradeoffsbetweentreatmentbenefitandsideeffects
AT kneuertzpeterj analysisofpatientpreferencesinlungcancerestimatingacceptabletradeoffsbetweentreatmentbenefitandsideeffects
AT presleycarolynj analysisofpatientpreferencesinlungcancerestimatingacceptabletradeoffsbetweentreatmentbenefitandsideeffects
AT bridgesjohnfp analysisofpatientpreferencesinlungcancerestimatingacceptabletradeoffsbetweentreatmentbenefitandsideeffects