Cargando…

Internal Fixation of an Intertrochanteric Fracture after Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic fracture is the most common cause of reoperation after resurfacing arthroplasty. The majority of fractures associated with this kind of arthroplasty are mostly subcapital fractures. Inter- and sub-trochanteric fractures after resurfacing arthroplasty are rarely reported,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koulischer, Simon, Devos, Stéphane, Verstraeten, Pierre-Bernard, Delahaut, Olivier, Muhadri, Atdhe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Indian Orthopaedic Research Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548032
http://dx.doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2019.v09.i06.1592
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic fracture is the most common cause of reoperation after resurfacing arthroplasty. The majority of fractures associated with this kind of arthroplasty are mostly subcapital fractures. Inter- and sub-trochanteric fractures after resurfacing arthroplasty are rarely reported, and there is no consensus regarding the treatment of such fractures. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a patient in whom an intertrochanteric femoral fracture distal to a hip resurfacing implant was successfully managed by internal fixation with the use of a locking compression plate (LCP), after failed conservative management. We also discuss an in-depth literature review on the topic. CONCLUSION: We believe that osteosynthesis is a better option than arthroplasty in the management of such injuries. Due to technical issues discussed in our paper, we believe LCP to be an optimal fixation device.