Cargando…

Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries

[Purpose] This study aimed to compare the Craig’s test and computed tomography (CT) in measuring the femoral anteversion angle (FAA) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The relationship between the FAA measured on CT, and the range of axial rotation of the hip joint and muscl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ito, Ikue, Miura, Kazutomo, Kimura, Yuka, Sasaki, Eiji, Tsuda, Eiichi, Ishibashi, Yasuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32581427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.365
_version_ 1783543012964433920
author Ito, Ikue
Miura, Kazutomo
Kimura, Yuka
Sasaki, Eiji
Tsuda, Eiichi
Ishibashi, Yasuyuki
author_facet Ito, Ikue
Miura, Kazutomo
Kimura, Yuka
Sasaki, Eiji
Tsuda, Eiichi
Ishibashi, Yasuyuki
author_sort Ito, Ikue
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] This study aimed to compare the Craig’s test and computed tomography (CT) in measuring the femoral anteversion angle (FAA) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The relationship between the FAA measured on CT, and the range of axial rotation of the hip joint and muscle tightness around the hip joint was also investigated. [Participants and Methods] Twenty-six patients who received CT examination within 3 months after ACL reconstruction were enrolled in this study. The Craig’s test, internal and external rotation of the hip, the Ely test, Ober’s test, and FAA on the CT were assessed. [Results] The FAA on the Craig’s test and CT in female patients was 24.3 ± 3.9° and 23.0 ± 10.3°, respectively on the uninjured side and 25.0 ± 5.2° and 20.3 ± 11.2°, respectively on the injured side, indicating no significant correlation between the 2 measurement techniques. In contrast, the FAA on the CT was significantly correlated with the range of internal rotation of the hip, which was 40.5 ± 6.1° on the uninjured side and 37.8 ± 5.6° on the injured side. [Conclusion] The results suggest that measuring the internal hip rotation range rather than the Craig’s test, provides more reliable estimates of the magnitude of FAA, and may help to evaluate the risk of ACL injuries in female athletes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7276780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72767802020-06-23 Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries Ito, Ikue Miura, Kazutomo Kimura, Yuka Sasaki, Eiji Tsuda, Eiichi Ishibashi, Yasuyuki J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] This study aimed to compare the Craig’s test and computed tomography (CT) in measuring the femoral anteversion angle (FAA) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The relationship between the FAA measured on CT, and the range of axial rotation of the hip joint and muscle tightness around the hip joint was also investigated. [Participants and Methods] Twenty-six patients who received CT examination within 3 months after ACL reconstruction were enrolled in this study. The Craig’s test, internal and external rotation of the hip, the Ely test, Ober’s test, and FAA on the CT were assessed. [Results] The FAA on the Craig’s test and CT in female patients was 24.3 ± 3.9° and 23.0 ± 10.3°, respectively on the uninjured side and 25.0 ± 5.2° and 20.3 ± 11.2°, respectively on the injured side, indicating no significant correlation between the 2 measurement techniques. In contrast, the FAA on the CT was significantly correlated with the range of internal rotation of the hip, which was 40.5 ± 6.1° on the uninjured side and 37.8 ± 5.6° on the injured side. [Conclusion] The results suggest that measuring the internal hip rotation range rather than the Craig’s test, provides more reliable estimates of the magnitude of FAA, and may help to evaluate the risk of ACL injuries in female athletes. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2020-06-02 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7276780/ /pubmed/32581427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.365 Text en 2020©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Ito, Ikue
Miura, Kazutomo
Kimura, Yuka
Sasaki, Eiji
Tsuda, Eiichi
Ishibashi, Yasuyuki
Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries
title Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries
title_full Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries
title_fullStr Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries
title_full_unstemmed Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries
title_short Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries
title_sort differences between the craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32581427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.365
work_keys_str_mv AT itoikue differencesbetweenthecraigstestandcomputedtomographyinmeasuringfemoralanteversioninpatientswithanteriorcruciateligamentinjuries
AT miurakazutomo differencesbetweenthecraigstestandcomputedtomographyinmeasuringfemoralanteversioninpatientswithanteriorcruciateligamentinjuries
AT kimurayuka differencesbetweenthecraigstestandcomputedtomographyinmeasuringfemoralanteversioninpatientswithanteriorcruciateligamentinjuries
AT sasakieiji differencesbetweenthecraigstestandcomputedtomographyinmeasuringfemoralanteversioninpatientswithanteriorcruciateligamentinjuries
AT tsudaeiichi differencesbetweenthecraigstestandcomputedtomographyinmeasuringfemoralanteversioninpatientswithanteriorcruciateligamentinjuries
AT ishibashiyasuyuki differencesbetweenthecraigstestandcomputedtomographyinmeasuringfemoralanteversioninpatientswithanteriorcruciateligamentinjuries