Cargando…
Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries
[Purpose] This study aimed to compare the Craig’s test and computed tomography (CT) in measuring the femoral anteversion angle (FAA) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The relationship between the FAA measured on CT, and the range of axial rotation of the hip joint and muscl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32581427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.365 |
_version_ | 1783543012964433920 |
---|---|
author | Ito, Ikue Miura, Kazutomo Kimura, Yuka Sasaki, Eiji Tsuda, Eiichi Ishibashi, Yasuyuki |
author_facet | Ito, Ikue Miura, Kazutomo Kimura, Yuka Sasaki, Eiji Tsuda, Eiichi Ishibashi, Yasuyuki |
author_sort | Ito, Ikue |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] This study aimed to compare the Craig’s test and computed tomography (CT) in measuring the femoral anteversion angle (FAA) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The relationship between the FAA measured on CT, and the range of axial rotation of the hip joint and muscle tightness around the hip joint was also investigated. [Participants and Methods] Twenty-six patients who received CT examination within 3 months after ACL reconstruction were enrolled in this study. The Craig’s test, internal and external rotation of the hip, the Ely test, Ober’s test, and FAA on the CT were assessed. [Results] The FAA on the Craig’s test and CT in female patients was 24.3 ± 3.9° and 23.0 ± 10.3°, respectively on the uninjured side and 25.0 ± 5.2° and 20.3 ± 11.2°, respectively on the injured side, indicating no significant correlation between the 2 measurement techniques. In contrast, the FAA on the CT was significantly correlated with the range of internal rotation of the hip, which was 40.5 ± 6.1° on the uninjured side and 37.8 ± 5.6° on the injured side. [Conclusion] The results suggest that measuring the internal hip rotation range rather than the Craig’s test, provides more reliable estimates of the magnitude of FAA, and may help to evaluate the risk of ACL injuries in female athletes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7276780 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72767802020-06-23 Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries Ito, Ikue Miura, Kazutomo Kimura, Yuka Sasaki, Eiji Tsuda, Eiichi Ishibashi, Yasuyuki J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] This study aimed to compare the Craig’s test and computed tomography (CT) in measuring the femoral anteversion angle (FAA) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The relationship between the FAA measured on CT, and the range of axial rotation of the hip joint and muscle tightness around the hip joint was also investigated. [Participants and Methods] Twenty-six patients who received CT examination within 3 months after ACL reconstruction were enrolled in this study. The Craig’s test, internal and external rotation of the hip, the Ely test, Ober’s test, and FAA on the CT were assessed. [Results] The FAA on the Craig’s test and CT in female patients was 24.3 ± 3.9° and 23.0 ± 10.3°, respectively on the uninjured side and 25.0 ± 5.2° and 20.3 ± 11.2°, respectively on the injured side, indicating no significant correlation between the 2 measurement techniques. In contrast, the FAA on the CT was significantly correlated with the range of internal rotation of the hip, which was 40.5 ± 6.1° on the uninjured side and 37.8 ± 5.6° on the injured side. [Conclusion] The results suggest that measuring the internal hip rotation range rather than the Craig’s test, provides more reliable estimates of the magnitude of FAA, and may help to evaluate the risk of ACL injuries in female athletes. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2020-06-02 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7276780/ /pubmed/32581427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.365 Text en 2020©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ito, Ikue Miura, Kazutomo Kimura, Yuka Sasaki, Eiji Tsuda, Eiichi Ishibashi, Yasuyuki Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries |
title | Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring
femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries |
title_full | Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring
femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries |
title_fullStr | Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring
femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring
femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries |
title_short | Differences between the Craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring
femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries |
title_sort | differences between the craig’s test and computed tomography in measuring
femoral anteversion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32581427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT itoikue differencesbetweenthecraigstestandcomputedtomographyinmeasuringfemoralanteversioninpatientswithanteriorcruciateligamentinjuries AT miurakazutomo differencesbetweenthecraigstestandcomputedtomographyinmeasuringfemoralanteversioninpatientswithanteriorcruciateligamentinjuries AT kimurayuka differencesbetweenthecraigstestandcomputedtomographyinmeasuringfemoralanteversioninpatientswithanteriorcruciateligamentinjuries AT sasakieiji differencesbetweenthecraigstestandcomputedtomographyinmeasuringfemoralanteversioninpatientswithanteriorcruciateligamentinjuries AT tsudaeiichi differencesbetweenthecraigstestandcomputedtomographyinmeasuringfemoralanteversioninpatientswithanteriorcruciateligamentinjuries AT ishibashiyasuyuki differencesbetweenthecraigstestandcomputedtomographyinmeasuringfemoralanteversioninpatientswithanteriorcruciateligamentinjuries |