Cargando…
Predicting the outcomes of preterm neonates beyond the neonatal intensive care unit: What are we missing?
ABSTRACT: Preterm infants are a population at high risk for mortality and adverse health outcomes. With recent improvements in survival to childhood, increasing attention is being paid to risk of long-term morbidity, specifically during childhood and young-adulthood. Although numerous tools for pred...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32428926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0968-5 |
_version_ | 1783543022377500672 |
---|---|
author | Crilly, Colin J. Haneuse, Sebastien Litt, Jonathan S. |
author_facet | Crilly, Colin J. Haneuse, Sebastien Litt, Jonathan S. |
author_sort | Crilly, Colin J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Preterm infants are a population at high risk for mortality and adverse health outcomes. With recent improvements in survival to childhood, increasing attention is being paid to risk of long-term morbidity, specifically during childhood and young-adulthood. Although numerous tools for predicting the functional outcomes of preterm neonates have been developed in the past three decades, no studies have provided a comprehensive overview of these tools, along with their strengths and weaknesses. The purpose of this article is to provide an in-depth, narrative review of the current risk models available for predicting the functional outcomes of preterm neonates. A total of 32 studies describing 43 separate models were considered. We found that most studies used similar physiologic variables and standard regression techniques to develop models that primarily predict the risk of poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. With a recently expanded knowledge regarding the many factors that affect neurodevelopment and other important outcomes, as well as a better understanding of the limitations of traditional analytic methods, we argue that there is great room for improvement in creating risk prediction tools for preterm neonates. We also consider the ethical implications of utilizing these tools for clinical decision-making. IMPACT: Based on a literature review of risk prediction models for preterm neonates predicting functional outcomes, future models should aim for more consistent outcomes definitions, standardized assessment schedules and measurement tools, and consideration of risk beyond physiologic antecedents. Our review provides a comprehensive analysis and critique of risk prediction models developed for preterm neonates, specifically predicting functional outcomes instead of mortality, to reveal areas of improvement for future studies aiming to develop risk prediction tools for this population. To our knowledge, this is the first literature review and narrative analysis of risk prediction models for preterm neonates regarding their functional outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7276948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72769482020-06-08 Predicting the outcomes of preterm neonates beyond the neonatal intensive care unit: What are we missing? Crilly, Colin J. Haneuse, Sebastien Litt, Jonathan S. Pediatr Res Review Article ABSTRACT: Preterm infants are a population at high risk for mortality and adverse health outcomes. With recent improvements in survival to childhood, increasing attention is being paid to risk of long-term morbidity, specifically during childhood and young-adulthood. Although numerous tools for predicting the functional outcomes of preterm neonates have been developed in the past three decades, no studies have provided a comprehensive overview of these tools, along with their strengths and weaknesses. The purpose of this article is to provide an in-depth, narrative review of the current risk models available for predicting the functional outcomes of preterm neonates. A total of 32 studies describing 43 separate models were considered. We found that most studies used similar physiologic variables and standard regression techniques to develop models that primarily predict the risk of poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. With a recently expanded knowledge regarding the many factors that affect neurodevelopment and other important outcomes, as well as a better understanding of the limitations of traditional analytic methods, we argue that there is great room for improvement in creating risk prediction tools for preterm neonates. We also consider the ethical implications of utilizing these tools for clinical decision-making. IMPACT: Based on a literature review of risk prediction models for preterm neonates predicting functional outcomes, future models should aim for more consistent outcomes definitions, standardized assessment schedules and measurement tools, and consideration of risk beyond physiologic antecedents. Our review provides a comprehensive analysis and critique of risk prediction models developed for preterm neonates, specifically predicting functional outcomes instead of mortality, to reveal areas of improvement for future studies aiming to develop risk prediction tools for this population. To our knowledge, this is the first literature review and narrative analysis of risk prediction models for preterm neonates regarding their functional outcomes. Nature Publishing Group US 2020-05-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7276948/ /pubmed/32428926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0968-5 Text en © International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Crilly, Colin J. Haneuse, Sebastien Litt, Jonathan S. Predicting the outcomes of preterm neonates beyond the neonatal intensive care unit: What are we missing? |
title | Predicting the outcomes of preterm neonates beyond the neonatal intensive care unit: What are we missing? |
title_full | Predicting the outcomes of preterm neonates beyond the neonatal intensive care unit: What are we missing? |
title_fullStr | Predicting the outcomes of preterm neonates beyond the neonatal intensive care unit: What are we missing? |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting the outcomes of preterm neonates beyond the neonatal intensive care unit: What are we missing? |
title_short | Predicting the outcomes of preterm neonates beyond the neonatal intensive care unit: What are we missing? |
title_sort | predicting the outcomes of preterm neonates beyond the neonatal intensive care unit: what are we missing? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32428926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0968-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crillycolinj predictingtheoutcomesofpretermneonatesbeyondtheneonatalintensivecareunitwhatarewemissing AT haneusesebastien predictingtheoutcomesofpretermneonatesbeyondtheneonatalintensivecareunitwhatarewemissing AT littjonathans predictingtheoutcomesofpretermneonatesbeyondtheneonatalintensivecareunitwhatarewemissing |