Cargando…
Analysis of Cyclist’s Drag on the Aero Position Using Numerical Simulations and Analytical Procedures: A Case Study
Background: Resistance acting on a cyclist is a major concern among the cycling fraternity. Most of the testing methods require previous training or expensive equipment and time-consuming set-ups. By contrast, analytical procedures are more affordable and numerical simulations are perfect for manipu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32423103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103430 |
_version_ | 1783543062395355136 |
---|---|
author | Forte, Pedro Marinho, Daniel A. Nikolaidis, Pantelis T. Knechtle, Beat Barbosa, Tiago M. Morais, Jorge E. |
author_facet | Forte, Pedro Marinho, Daniel A. Nikolaidis, Pantelis T. Knechtle, Beat Barbosa, Tiago M. Morais, Jorge E. |
author_sort | Forte, Pedro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Resistance acting on a cyclist is a major concern among the cycling fraternity. Most of the testing methods require previous training or expensive equipment and time-consuming set-ups. By contrast, analytical procedures are more affordable and numerical simulations are perfect for manipulating and controlling inputs. The aim of this case study was to compare the drag of a cyclist in the aero position as measured using numerical simulation and analytical procedures. Methods: An elite male cyclist (65 kg in mass and 1.72 m in height) volunteered to take part in this research. The cyclist was wearing his competition gear, helmet and bicycle. A three-dimensional model of the bicycle and cyclist in the aero position was obtained to run the numerical simulations. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a set of analytical procedures were carried out to assess drag, frontal area and drag coefficient, between 1 m/s and 22 m/s, with increments of 1 m/s. The t-test paired samples and linear regression were selected to compare, correlate and assess the methods agreement. Results: No significant differences (t = 2.826; p = 0.275) between CFD and analytical procedures were found. The linear regression showed a very high adjustment for drag (R(2) = 0.995; p < 0.001). However, the drag values obtained by the analytical procedures seemed to be overestimated, even though without effect (d = 0.11). Conclusions: These findings suggest that drag might be assessed using both a set of analytical procedures and CFD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7277172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72771722020-06-15 Analysis of Cyclist’s Drag on the Aero Position Using Numerical Simulations and Analytical Procedures: A Case Study Forte, Pedro Marinho, Daniel A. Nikolaidis, Pantelis T. Knechtle, Beat Barbosa, Tiago M. Morais, Jorge E. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Resistance acting on a cyclist is a major concern among the cycling fraternity. Most of the testing methods require previous training or expensive equipment and time-consuming set-ups. By contrast, analytical procedures are more affordable and numerical simulations are perfect for manipulating and controlling inputs. The aim of this case study was to compare the drag of a cyclist in the aero position as measured using numerical simulation and analytical procedures. Methods: An elite male cyclist (65 kg in mass and 1.72 m in height) volunteered to take part in this research. The cyclist was wearing his competition gear, helmet and bicycle. A three-dimensional model of the bicycle and cyclist in the aero position was obtained to run the numerical simulations. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a set of analytical procedures were carried out to assess drag, frontal area and drag coefficient, between 1 m/s and 22 m/s, with increments of 1 m/s. The t-test paired samples and linear regression were selected to compare, correlate and assess the methods agreement. Results: No significant differences (t = 2.826; p = 0.275) between CFD and analytical procedures were found. The linear regression showed a very high adjustment for drag (R(2) = 0.995; p < 0.001). However, the drag values obtained by the analytical procedures seemed to be overestimated, even though without effect (d = 0.11). Conclusions: These findings suggest that drag might be assessed using both a set of analytical procedures and CFD. MDPI 2020-05-14 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7277172/ /pubmed/32423103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103430 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Forte, Pedro Marinho, Daniel A. Nikolaidis, Pantelis T. Knechtle, Beat Barbosa, Tiago M. Morais, Jorge E. Analysis of Cyclist’s Drag on the Aero Position Using Numerical Simulations and Analytical Procedures: A Case Study |
title | Analysis of Cyclist’s Drag on the Aero Position Using Numerical Simulations and Analytical Procedures: A Case Study |
title_full | Analysis of Cyclist’s Drag on the Aero Position Using Numerical Simulations and Analytical Procedures: A Case Study |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Cyclist’s Drag on the Aero Position Using Numerical Simulations and Analytical Procedures: A Case Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Cyclist’s Drag on the Aero Position Using Numerical Simulations and Analytical Procedures: A Case Study |
title_short | Analysis of Cyclist’s Drag on the Aero Position Using Numerical Simulations and Analytical Procedures: A Case Study |
title_sort | analysis of cyclist’s drag on the aero position using numerical simulations and analytical procedures: a case study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32423103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103430 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fortepedro analysisofcyclistsdragontheaeropositionusingnumericalsimulationsandanalyticalproceduresacasestudy AT marinhodaniela analysisofcyclistsdragontheaeropositionusingnumericalsimulationsandanalyticalproceduresacasestudy AT nikolaidispantelist analysisofcyclistsdragontheaeropositionusingnumericalsimulationsandanalyticalproceduresacasestudy AT knechtlebeat analysisofcyclistsdragontheaeropositionusingnumericalsimulationsandanalyticalproceduresacasestudy AT barbosatiagom analysisofcyclistsdragontheaeropositionusingnumericalsimulationsandanalyticalproceduresacasestudy AT moraisjorgee analysisofcyclistsdragontheaeropositionusingnumericalsimulationsandanalyticalproceduresacasestudy |