Cargando…
Effects of a Rehabilitation Programme with a Nasal Inspiratory Restriction Device on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in COPD
Objective: The objective was to assess the effects of a nasal restriction device for inspiratory muscle training, called Feelbreathe(®), added to a rehabilitation program (RP) on exercise capacity, quality of life, dyspnea and inspiratory muscle strength in patients with stable COPD. Methods: Patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456097 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103669 |
_version_ | 1783543073095024640 |
---|---|
author | Arnedillo, Aurelio Gonzalez-Montesinos, Jose L. Fernandez-Santos, Jorge R. Vaz-Pardal, Carmen España-Domínguez, Carolina Ponce-González, Jesús G. Cuenca-García, Magdalena |
author_facet | Arnedillo, Aurelio Gonzalez-Montesinos, Jose L. Fernandez-Santos, Jorge R. Vaz-Pardal, Carmen España-Domínguez, Carolina Ponce-González, Jesús G. Cuenca-García, Magdalena |
author_sort | Arnedillo, Aurelio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: The objective was to assess the effects of a nasal restriction device for inspiratory muscle training, called Feelbreathe(®), added to a rehabilitation program (RP) on exercise capacity, quality of life, dyspnea and inspiratory muscle strength in patients with stable COPD. Methods: Patients were randomized into three groups, one performed a supervised RP using the Feelbreathe(®) device (FB group), the second group developed the same RP with oronasal breathing without FB (ONB group) and the third was the control group (CG). We evaluated inspiratory muscle strength (PImax), dyspnea (mMRC), quality of life (CAT) and exercise capacity (6MWT) before and after 8-week of RP. Results: A total of 16 patients completed the study, seven in FB group, five in ONB group and four in the CG. After the RP, the FB group showed a significant increase in PImax (93.3 ± 19.1 vs. 123.0 ± 15.8 mmHg) and in the 6MWT distance (462.9 ± 71.8 m vs. 529.1 ± 50.1 m) and a decrease in the CAT score (9.7 ± 6.5 vs. 5.9 ± 6.0) and in the mMRC dyspnea score. FB provides greater improvement in PImax, dyspnea, quality of life and 6MWT than ONB. Conclusions: The Feelbreathe(®) device provides greater improvements in quality of life, dyspnea, exercise capacity and inspiratory muscle strength compared to patients that did not use it. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7277218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72772182020-06-15 Effects of a Rehabilitation Programme with a Nasal Inspiratory Restriction Device on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in COPD Arnedillo, Aurelio Gonzalez-Montesinos, Jose L. Fernandez-Santos, Jorge R. Vaz-Pardal, Carmen España-Domínguez, Carolina Ponce-González, Jesús G. Cuenca-García, Magdalena Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Objective: The objective was to assess the effects of a nasal restriction device for inspiratory muscle training, called Feelbreathe(®), added to a rehabilitation program (RP) on exercise capacity, quality of life, dyspnea and inspiratory muscle strength in patients with stable COPD. Methods: Patients were randomized into three groups, one performed a supervised RP using the Feelbreathe(®) device (FB group), the second group developed the same RP with oronasal breathing without FB (ONB group) and the third was the control group (CG). We evaluated inspiratory muscle strength (PImax), dyspnea (mMRC), quality of life (CAT) and exercise capacity (6MWT) before and after 8-week of RP. Results: A total of 16 patients completed the study, seven in FB group, five in ONB group and four in the CG. After the RP, the FB group showed a significant increase in PImax (93.3 ± 19.1 vs. 123.0 ± 15.8 mmHg) and in the 6MWT distance (462.9 ± 71.8 m vs. 529.1 ± 50.1 m) and a decrease in the CAT score (9.7 ± 6.5 vs. 5.9 ± 6.0) and in the mMRC dyspnea score. FB provides greater improvement in PImax, dyspnea, quality of life and 6MWT than ONB. Conclusions: The Feelbreathe(®) device provides greater improvements in quality of life, dyspnea, exercise capacity and inspiratory muscle strength compared to patients that did not use it. MDPI 2020-05-22 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7277218/ /pubmed/32456097 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103669 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Arnedillo, Aurelio Gonzalez-Montesinos, Jose L. Fernandez-Santos, Jorge R. Vaz-Pardal, Carmen España-Domínguez, Carolina Ponce-González, Jesús G. Cuenca-García, Magdalena Effects of a Rehabilitation Programme with a Nasal Inspiratory Restriction Device on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in COPD |
title | Effects of a Rehabilitation Programme with a Nasal Inspiratory Restriction Device on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in COPD |
title_full | Effects of a Rehabilitation Programme with a Nasal Inspiratory Restriction Device on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in COPD |
title_fullStr | Effects of a Rehabilitation Programme with a Nasal Inspiratory Restriction Device on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in COPD |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of a Rehabilitation Programme with a Nasal Inspiratory Restriction Device on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in COPD |
title_short | Effects of a Rehabilitation Programme with a Nasal Inspiratory Restriction Device on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in COPD |
title_sort | effects of a rehabilitation programme with a nasal inspiratory restriction device on exercise capacity and quality of life in copd |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456097 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103669 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arnedilloaurelio effectsofarehabilitationprogrammewithanasalinspiratoryrestrictiondeviceonexercisecapacityandqualityoflifeincopd AT gonzalezmontesinosjosel effectsofarehabilitationprogrammewithanasalinspiratoryrestrictiondeviceonexercisecapacityandqualityoflifeincopd AT fernandezsantosjorger effectsofarehabilitationprogrammewithanasalinspiratoryrestrictiondeviceonexercisecapacityandqualityoflifeincopd AT vazpardalcarmen effectsofarehabilitationprogrammewithanasalinspiratoryrestrictiondeviceonexercisecapacityandqualityoflifeincopd AT espanadominguezcarolina effectsofarehabilitationprogrammewithanasalinspiratoryrestrictiondeviceonexercisecapacityandqualityoflifeincopd AT poncegonzalezjesusg effectsofarehabilitationprogrammewithanasalinspiratoryrestrictiondeviceonexercisecapacityandqualityoflifeincopd AT cuencagarciamagdalena effectsofarehabilitationprogrammewithanasalinspiratoryrestrictiondeviceonexercisecapacityandqualityoflifeincopd |