Cargando…

Was the Devonian placoderm Titanichthys a suspension feeder?

Large nektonic suspension feeders have evolved multiple times. The apparent trend among apex predators for some evolving into feeding on small zooplankton is of interest for understanding the associated shifts in anatomy and behaviour, while the spatial and temporal distribution gives clues to an in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coatham, Samuel J., Vinther, Jakob, Rayfield, Emily J., Klug, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200272
_version_ 1783543079418986496
author Coatham, Samuel J.
Vinther, Jakob
Rayfield, Emily J.
Klug, Christian
author_facet Coatham, Samuel J.
Vinther, Jakob
Rayfield, Emily J.
Klug, Christian
author_sort Coatham, Samuel J.
collection PubMed
description Large nektonic suspension feeders have evolved multiple times. The apparent trend among apex predators for some evolving into feeding on small zooplankton is of interest for understanding the associated shifts in anatomy and behaviour, while the spatial and temporal distribution gives clues to an inherent relationship with ocean primary productivity and how past and future perturbations to these may impact on the different tiers of the food web. The evolution of large nektonic suspension feeders—‘gentle giants’—occurred four times among chondrichthyan fishes (e.g. whale sharks, basking sharks and manta rays), as well as in baleen whales (mysticetes), the Mesozoic pachycormid fishes and at least twice in radiodontan stem group arthropods (Anomalocaridids) during the Cambrian explosion. The Late Devonian placoderm Titanichthys has tentatively been considered to have been a megaplanktivore, primarily due to its gigantic size and narrow, edentulous jaws while no suspension-feeding apparatus have ever been reported. Here, the potential for microphagy and other feeding behaviours in Titanichthys is assessed via a comparative study of jaw mechanics in Titanichthys and other placoderms with presumably differing feeding habits (macrophagy and durophagy). Finite-element models of the lower jaws of Titanichthys termieri in comparison to Dunkleosteus terrelli and Tafilalichthys lavocati reveal considerably less resistance to von Mises stress in this taxon. Comparisons with a selection of large-bodied extant taxa of similar ecological diversity reveal similar disparities in jaw stress resistance. Our results, therefore, conform to the hypothesis that Titanichthys was a suspension feeder with jaws ill-suited for biting and crushing but well suited for gaping ram feeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7277245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72772452020-06-11 Was the Devonian placoderm Titanichthys a suspension feeder? Coatham, Samuel J. Vinther, Jakob Rayfield, Emily J. Klug, Christian R Soc Open Sci Earth and Environmental Science Large nektonic suspension feeders have evolved multiple times. The apparent trend among apex predators for some evolving into feeding on small zooplankton is of interest for understanding the associated shifts in anatomy and behaviour, while the spatial and temporal distribution gives clues to an inherent relationship with ocean primary productivity and how past and future perturbations to these may impact on the different tiers of the food web. The evolution of large nektonic suspension feeders—‘gentle giants’—occurred four times among chondrichthyan fishes (e.g. whale sharks, basking sharks and manta rays), as well as in baleen whales (mysticetes), the Mesozoic pachycormid fishes and at least twice in radiodontan stem group arthropods (Anomalocaridids) during the Cambrian explosion. The Late Devonian placoderm Titanichthys has tentatively been considered to have been a megaplanktivore, primarily due to its gigantic size and narrow, edentulous jaws while no suspension-feeding apparatus have ever been reported. Here, the potential for microphagy and other feeding behaviours in Titanichthys is assessed via a comparative study of jaw mechanics in Titanichthys and other placoderms with presumably differing feeding habits (macrophagy and durophagy). Finite-element models of the lower jaws of Titanichthys termieri in comparison to Dunkleosteus terrelli and Tafilalichthys lavocati reveal considerably less resistance to von Mises stress in this taxon. Comparisons with a selection of large-bodied extant taxa of similar ecological diversity reveal similar disparities in jaw stress resistance. Our results, therefore, conform to the hypothesis that Titanichthys was a suspension feeder with jaws ill-suited for biting and crushing but well suited for gaping ram feeding. The Royal Society 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7277245/ /pubmed/32537223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200272 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Earth and Environmental Science
Coatham, Samuel J.
Vinther, Jakob
Rayfield, Emily J.
Klug, Christian
Was the Devonian placoderm Titanichthys a suspension feeder?
title Was the Devonian placoderm Titanichthys a suspension feeder?
title_full Was the Devonian placoderm Titanichthys a suspension feeder?
title_fullStr Was the Devonian placoderm Titanichthys a suspension feeder?
title_full_unstemmed Was the Devonian placoderm Titanichthys a suspension feeder?
title_short Was the Devonian placoderm Titanichthys a suspension feeder?
title_sort was the devonian placoderm titanichthys a suspension feeder?
topic Earth and Environmental Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200272
work_keys_str_mv AT coathamsamuelj wasthedevonianplacodermtitanichthysasuspensionfeeder
AT vintherjakob wasthedevonianplacodermtitanichthysasuspensionfeeder
AT rayfieldemilyj wasthedevonianplacodermtitanichthysasuspensionfeeder
AT klugchristian wasthedevonianplacodermtitanichthysasuspensionfeeder