Cargando…

The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children

Developmental dyslexia (DD) is a common neurobehavioral disorder in children. It refers to the phenomenon in which children with normal intelligence lag significantly behind their peers in reading ability. In China, there is no unified standard for the assessment of dyslexia due to the use of simpli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Anyan, Wu, Kusheng, Li, Anna, Zhang, Xuanzhi, Lin, Yuhang, Huang, Yanhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103660
_version_ 1783543128732467200
author Huang, Anyan
Wu, Kusheng
Li, Anna
Zhang, Xuanzhi
Lin, Yuhang
Huang, Yanhong
author_facet Huang, Anyan
Wu, Kusheng
Li, Anna
Zhang, Xuanzhi
Lin, Yuhang
Huang, Yanhong
author_sort Huang, Anyan
collection PubMed
description Developmental dyslexia (DD) is a common neurobehavioral disorder in children. It refers to the phenomenon in which children with normal intelligence lag significantly behind their peers in reading ability. In China, there is no unified standard for the assessment of dyslexia due to the use of simplified and traditional Chinese characters in different regions. This study was aimed at analyzing the reliability and validity of the self-developed Chinese dyslexia assessment tool named Chinese Reading Ability Test (CRAT), which was suitable for students of grade 3 to 5 in primary school. We randomly selected three primary schools in Shantou city of China, including two in the central district and one in the surrounding district. A total of 1492 students of grades 3 through 5 were recruited. We assessed the reliability of CRAT by test–retest reliability and internal consistency. The validity assessment was realized by discriminant validity, content validity and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For reliability, the test–retest correlation coefficient of the total score of the CRAT was 0.671. The difference between the test–retest was not statistically significant. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the CRAT was 0.75. For validity, the correlation coefficient between the score of each subscale and the total score of the scale ranged from 0.29 to 0.73. The indexes of the three structural equation models all meet the standard (p > 0.05, χ(2)/df < 2.00, RMSEA < 0.05, GFI > 0.90, AGFI > 0.90, NFI > 0.90, CFI > 0.90 and IFI > 0.90). The fitting effects of the models were good. The CRAT has sufficient reliability and validity which could be used for the assessment and auxiliary diagnosis of Chinese Dyslexia in primary school students of grade 3 to 5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7277479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72774792020-06-12 The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children Huang, Anyan Wu, Kusheng Li, Anna Zhang, Xuanzhi Lin, Yuhang Huang, Yanhong Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Developmental dyslexia (DD) is a common neurobehavioral disorder in children. It refers to the phenomenon in which children with normal intelligence lag significantly behind their peers in reading ability. In China, there is no unified standard for the assessment of dyslexia due to the use of simplified and traditional Chinese characters in different regions. This study was aimed at analyzing the reliability and validity of the self-developed Chinese dyslexia assessment tool named Chinese Reading Ability Test (CRAT), which was suitable for students of grade 3 to 5 in primary school. We randomly selected three primary schools in Shantou city of China, including two in the central district and one in the surrounding district. A total of 1492 students of grades 3 through 5 were recruited. We assessed the reliability of CRAT by test–retest reliability and internal consistency. The validity assessment was realized by discriminant validity, content validity and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For reliability, the test–retest correlation coefficient of the total score of the CRAT was 0.671. The difference between the test–retest was not statistically significant. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the CRAT was 0.75. For validity, the correlation coefficient between the score of each subscale and the total score of the scale ranged from 0.29 to 0.73. The indexes of the three structural equation models all meet the standard (p > 0.05, χ(2)/df < 2.00, RMSEA < 0.05, GFI > 0.90, AGFI > 0.90, NFI > 0.90, CFI > 0.90 and IFI > 0.90). The fitting effects of the models were good. The CRAT has sufficient reliability and validity which could be used for the assessment and auxiliary diagnosis of Chinese Dyslexia in primary school students of grade 3 to 5. MDPI 2020-05-22 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7277479/ /pubmed/32456019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103660 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Huang, Anyan
Wu, Kusheng
Li, Anna
Zhang, Xuanzhi
Lin, Yuhang
Huang, Yanhong
The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children
title The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children
title_full The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children
title_fullStr The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children
title_full_unstemmed The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children
title_short The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children
title_sort reliability and validity of an assessment tool for developmental dyslexia in chinese children
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103660
work_keys_str_mv AT huanganyan thereliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren
AT wukusheng thereliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren
AT lianna thereliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren
AT zhangxuanzhi thereliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren
AT linyuhang thereliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren
AT huangyanhong thereliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren
AT huanganyan reliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren
AT wukusheng reliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren
AT lianna reliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren
AT zhangxuanzhi reliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren
AT linyuhang reliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren
AT huangyanhong reliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren