Cargando…
The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children
Developmental dyslexia (DD) is a common neurobehavioral disorder in children. It refers to the phenomenon in which children with normal intelligence lag significantly behind their peers in reading ability. In China, there is no unified standard for the assessment of dyslexia due to the use of simpli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103660 |
_version_ | 1783543128732467200 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Anyan Wu, Kusheng Li, Anna Zhang, Xuanzhi Lin, Yuhang Huang, Yanhong |
author_facet | Huang, Anyan Wu, Kusheng Li, Anna Zhang, Xuanzhi Lin, Yuhang Huang, Yanhong |
author_sort | Huang, Anyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Developmental dyslexia (DD) is a common neurobehavioral disorder in children. It refers to the phenomenon in which children with normal intelligence lag significantly behind their peers in reading ability. In China, there is no unified standard for the assessment of dyslexia due to the use of simplified and traditional Chinese characters in different regions. This study was aimed at analyzing the reliability and validity of the self-developed Chinese dyslexia assessment tool named Chinese Reading Ability Test (CRAT), which was suitable for students of grade 3 to 5 in primary school. We randomly selected three primary schools in Shantou city of China, including two in the central district and one in the surrounding district. A total of 1492 students of grades 3 through 5 were recruited. We assessed the reliability of CRAT by test–retest reliability and internal consistency. The validity assessment was realized by discriminant validity, content validity and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For reliability, the test–retest correlation coefficient of the total score of the CRAT was 0.671. The difference between the test–retest was not statistically significant. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the CRAT was 0.75. For validity, the correlation coefficient between the score of each subscale and the total score of the scale ranged from 0.29 to 0.73. The indexes of the three structural equation models all meet the standard (p > 0.05, χ(2)/df < 2.00, RMSEA < 0.05, GFI > 0.90, AGFI > 0.90, NFI > 0.90, CFI > 0.90 and IFI > 0.90). The fitting effects of the models were good. The CRAT has sufficient reliability and validity which could be used for the assessment and auxiliary diagnosis of Chinese Dyslexia in primary school students of grade 3 to 5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7277479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72774792020-06-12 The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children Huang, Anyan Wu, Kusheng Li, Anna Zhang, Xuanzhi Lin, Yuhang Huang, Yanhong Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Developmental dyslexia (DD) is a common neurobehavioral disorder in children. It refers to the phenomenon in which children with normal intelligence lag significantly behind their peers in reading ability. In China, there is no unified standard for the assessment of dyslexia due to the use of simplified and traditional Chinese characters in different regions. This study was aimed at analyzing the reliability and validity of the self-developed Chinese dyslexia assessment tool named Chinese Reading Ability Test (CRAT), which was suitable for students of grade 3 to 5 in primary school. We randomly selected three primary schools in Shantou city of China, including two in the central district and one in the surrounding district. A total of 1492 students of grades 3 through 5 were recruited. We assessed the reliability of CRAT by test–retest reliability and internal consistency. The validity assessment was realized by discriminant validity, content validity and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For reliability, the test–retest correlation coefficient of the total score of the CRAT was 0.671. The difference between the test–retest was not statistically significant. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the CRAT was 0.75. For validity, the correlation coefficient between the score of each subscale and the total score of the scale ranged from 0.29 to 0.73. The indexes of the three structural equation models all meet the standard (p > 0.05, χ(2)/df < 2.00, RMSEA < 0.05, GFI > 0.90, AGFI > 0.90, NFI > 0.90, CFI > 0.90 and IFI > 0.90). The fitting effects of the models were good. The CRAT has sufficient reliability and validity which could be used for the assessment and auxiliary diagnosis of Chinese Dyslexia in primary school students of grade 3 to 5. MDPI 2020-05-22 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7277479/ /pubmed/32456019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103660 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Huang, Anyan Wu, Kusheng Li, Anna Zhang, Xuanzhi Lin, Yuhang Huang, Yanhong The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children |
title | The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children |
title_full | The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children |
title_fullStr | The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children |
title_full_unstemmed | The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children |
title_short | The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children |
title_sort | reliability and validity of an assessment tool for developmental dyslexia in chinese children |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huanganyan thereliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren AT wukusheng thereliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren AT lianna thereliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren AT zhangxuanzhi thereliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren AT linyuhang thereliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren AT huangyanhong thereliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren AT huanganyan reliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren AT wukusheng reliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren AT lianna reliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren AT zhangxuanzhi reliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren AT linyuhang reliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren AT huangyanhong reliabilityandvalidityofanassessmenttoolfordevelopmentaldyslexiainchinesechildren |