Cargando…

Positive evidence for neonatal imitation: A general response, adaptive engagement

The study employed four gestural models using frame‐by‐frame microanalytic methods, and followed how the behaviours unfolded over time. Forty‐two human newborns (0–3 days) were examined for their imitation of tongue protrusion, ‘head tilt with looking up’, three‐finger and two‐finger gestures. The r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagy, Emese, Pilling, Karen, Blake, Victoria, Orvos, Hajnalka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31408564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/desc.12894
_version_ 1783543132037578752
author Nagy, Emese
Pilling, Karen
Blake, Victoria
Orvos, Hajnalka
author_facet Nagy, Emese
Pilling, Karen
Blake, Victoria
Orvos, Hajnalka
author_sort Nagy, Emese
collection PubMed
description The study employed four gestural models using frame‐by‐frame microanalytic methods, and followed how the behaviours unfolded over time. Forty‐two human newborns (0–3 days) were examined for their imitation of tongue protrusion, ‘head tilt with looking up’, three‐finger and two‐finger gestures. The results showed that all three gesture groups were imitated. Results of the temporal analyses revealed an early and a later, second stage of responses. Later responses were characterized by a suppression of similar, but non‐matching movements. Perinatal imitation is not a phenomenon served by a single underlying mechanism; it has at least two different stages. An early phase is followed by voluntary matching behaviour by the neonatal infant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7277498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72774982020-06-09 Positive evidence for neonatal imitation: A general response, adaptive engagement Nagy, Emese Pilling, Karen Blake, Victoria Orvos, Hajnalka Dev Sci Papers The study employed four gestural models using frame‐by‐frame microanalytic methods, and followed how the behaviours unfolded over time. Forty‐two human newborns (0–3 days) were examined for their imitation of tongue protrusion, ‘head tilt with looking up’, three‐finger and two‐finger gestures. The results showed that all three gesture groups were imitated. Results of the temporal analyses revealed an early and a later, second stage of responses. Later responses were characterized by a suppression of similar, but non‐matching movements. Perinatal imitation is not a phenomenon served by a single underlying mechanism; it has at least two different stages. An early phase is followed by voluntary matching behaviour by the neonatal infant. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-01 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7277498/ /pubmed/31408564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/desc.12894 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Developmental Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Papers
Nagy, Emese
Pilling, Karen
Blake, Victoria
Orvos, Hajnalka
Positive evidence for neonatal imitation: A general response, adaptive engagement
title Positive evidence for neonatal imitation: A general response, adaptive engagement
title_full Positive evidence for neonatal imitation: A general response, adaptive engagement
title_fullStr Positive evidence for neonatal imitation: A general response, adaptive engagement
title_full_unstemmed Positive evidence for neonatal imitation: A general response, adaptive engagement
title_short Positive evidence for neonatal imitation: A general response, adaptive engagement
title_sort positive evidence for neonatal imitation: a general response, adaptive engagement
topic Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31408564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/desc.12894
work_keys_str_mv AT nagyemese positiveevidenceforneonatalimitationageneralresponseadaptiveengagement
AT pillingkaren positiveevidenceforneonatalimitationageneralresponseadaptiveengagement
AT blakevictoria positiveevidenceforneonatalimitationageneralresponseadaptiveengagement
AT orvoshajnalka positiveevidenceforneonatalimitationageneralresponseadaptiveengagement