Cargando…

Visual and anatomic outcomes of sustained single agent anti-VEGF treatment versus double anti-VEGF switching in the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema

BACKGROUND: To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes in eyes with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) after initial anti-VEGF therapy that were retreated continuously with the same anti-VEGF drug versus those that underwent two successive cycles of medication change in anti-VEGF drugs (doub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sorour, Osama A., Liu, Keke, Mehta, Nihaal, Braun, Phillip, Gendelman, Isaac, Nassar, Elsayed, Baumal, Caroline R., Witkin, Andre J., Duker, Jay S., Waheed, Nadia K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-020-00220-5
_version_ 1783543260111699968
author Sorour, Osama A.
Liu, Keke
Mehta, Nihaal
Braun, Phillip
Gendelman, Isaac
Nassar, Elsayed
Baumal, Caroline R.
Witkin, Andre J.
Duker, Jay S.
Waheed, Nadia K.
author_facet Sorour, Osama A.
Liu, Keke
Mehta, Nihaal
Braun, Phillip
Gendelman, Isaac
Nassar, Elsayed
Baumal, Caroline R.
Witkin, Andre J.
Duker, Jay S.
Waheed, Nadia K.
author_sort Sorour, Osama A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes in eyes with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) after initial anti-VEGF therapy that were retreated continuously with the same anti-VEGF drug versus those that underwent two successive cycles of medication change in anti-VEGF drugs (double anti-VEGF switch). METHODS: Retrospective review of eyes with persistent DME after 3 initial consecutive monthly anti-VEGF injections. This cohort was divided into two groups: Group 1 continued to receive the same initial anti-VEGF drug for at least 18 months while group 2 eyes were switched to different anti-VEGF medications twice. Group 1 was further subdivided into: Group 1A composed of eyes with less than 20% reduction in central subfield thickness (CRT) at month 3; and group 1B eyes with greater than or equal to 20% reduction in CRT. The percentage of eyes that achieved greater than 10 letters visual acuity (VA) gain or loss was recorded as the primary end point (through month 18 in group 1 and month 6 after 2nd switch in group 2). RESULTS: Group 1A, 1B and group 2 were composed of 24, 18, and 14 eyes respectively. 34.7%, 56.2% and 36.3% of eyes achieved > 10 letters gain, while 4.3%, 6.2% and 27.2% of eyes lost > 10 letters in groups 1A, 1B, and 2, respectively. Analysis of the visual acuity (VA) letter change in this time interval revealed no significant difference between all groups (p = 0.11). Mean VA and CRT measurements at the primary endpoint in all groups were 0.5, 0.39, and 0.47 logMAR (p = 0.44), and 369.7, 279.9, 321 µm, (p = 0.01) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the visual outcomes between the two treatment strategies in eyes with persistent DME after 3 consecutive anti-VEGF injections. This may indicate that anti-VEGF switching—even if it is done twice—may have comparable clinical outcomes to sustained treatment with one agent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7278067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72780672020-06-09 Visual and anatomic outcomes of sustained single agent anti-VEGF treatment versus double anti-VEGF switching in the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema Sorour, Osama A. Liu, Keke Mehta, Nihaal Braun, Phillip Gendelman, Isaac Nassar, Elsayed Baumal, Caroline R. Witkin, Andre J. Duker, Jay S. Waheed, Nadia K. Int J Retina Vitreous Original Article BACKGROUND: To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes in eyes with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) after initial anti-VEGF therapy that were retreated continuously with the same anti-VEGF drug versus those that underwent two successive cycles of medication change in anti-VEGF drugs (double anti-VEGF switch). METHODS: Retrospective review of eyes with persistent DME after 3 initial consecutive monthly anti-VEGF injections. This cohort was divided into two groups: Group 1 continued to receive the same initial anti-VEGF drug for at least 18 months while group 2 eyes were switched to different anti-VEGF medications twice. Group 1 was further subdivided into: Group 1A composed of eyes with less than 20% reduction in central subfield thickness (CRT) at month 3; and group 1B eyes with greater than or equal to 20% reduction in CRT. The percentage of eyes that achieved greater than 10 letters visual acuity (VA) gain or loss was recorded as the primary end point (through month 18 in group 1 and month 6 after 2nd switch in group 2). RESULTS: Group 1A, 1B and group 2 were composed of 24, 18, and 14 eyes respectively. 34.7%, 56.2% and 36.3% of eyes achieved > 10 letters gain, while 4.3%, 6.2% and 27.2% of eyes lost > 10 letters in groups 1A, 1B, and 2, respectively. Analysis of the visual acuity (VA) letter change in this time interval revealed no significant difference between all groups (p = 0.11). Mean VA and CRT measurements at the primary endpoint in all groups were 0.5, 0.39, and 0.47 logMAR (p = 0.44), and 369.7, 279.9, 321 µm, (p = 0.01) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the visual outcomes between the two treatment strategies in eyes with persistent DME after 3 consecutive anti-VEGF injections. This may indicate that anti-VEGF switching—even if it is done twice—may have comparable clinical outcomes to sustained treatment with one agent. BioMed Central 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7278067/ /pubmed/32523776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-020-00220-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sorour, Osama A.
Liu, Keke
Mehta, Nihaal
Braun, Phillip
Gendelman, Isaac
Nassar, Elsayed
Baumal, Caroline R.
Witkin, Andre J.
Duker, Jay S.
Waheed, Nadia K.
Visual and anatomic outcomes of sustained single agent anti-VEGF treatment versus double anti-VEGF switching in the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema
title Visual and anatomic outcomes of sustained single agent anti-VEGF treatment versus double anti-VEGF switching in the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema
title_full Visual and anatomic outcomes of sustained single agent anti-VEGF treatment versus double anti-VEGF switching in the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema
title_fullStr Visual and anatomic outcomes of sustained single agent anti-VEGF treatment versus double anti-VEGF switching in the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema
title_full_unstemmed Visual and anatomic outcomes of sustained single agent anti-VEGF treatment versus double anti-VEGF switching in the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema
title_short Visual and anatomic outcomes of sustained single agent anti-VEGF treatment versus double anti-VEGF switching in the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema
title_sort visual and anatomic outcomes of sustained single agent anti-vegf treatment versus double anti-vegf switching in the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-020-00220-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sorourosamaa visualandanatomicoutcomesofsustainedsingleagentantivegftreatmentversusdoubleantivegfswitchinginthetreatmentofpersistentdiabeticmacularedema
AT liukeke visualandanatomicoutcomesofsustainedsingleagentantivegftreatmentversusdoubleantivegfswitchinginthetreatmentofpersistentdiabeticmacularedema
AT mehtanihaal visualandanatomicoutcomesofsustainedsingleagentantivegftreatmentversusdoubleantivegfswitchinginthetreatmentofpersistentdiabeticmacularedema
AT braunphillip visualandanatomicoutcomesofsustainedsingleagentantivegftreatmentversusdoubleantivegfswitchinginthetreatmentofpersistentdiabeticmacularedema
AT gendelmanisaac visualandanatomicoutcomesofsustainedsingleagentantivegftreatmentversusdoubleantivegfswitchinginthetreatmentofpersistentdiabeticmacularedema
AT nassarelsayed visualandanatomicoutcomesofsustainedsingleagentantivegftreatmentversusdoubleantivegfswitchinginthetreatmentofpersistentdiabeticmacularedema
AT baumalcaroliner visualandanatomicoutcomesofsustainedsingleagentantivegftreatmentversusdoubleantivegfswitchinginthetreatmentofpersistentdiabeticmacularedema
AT witkinandrej visualandanatomicoutcomesofsustainedsingleagentantivegftreatmentversusdoubleantivegfswitchinginthetreatmentofpersistentdiabeticmacularedema
AT dukerjays visualandanatomicoutcomesofsustainedsingleagentantivegftreatmentversusdoubleantivegfswitchinginthetreatmentofpersistentdiabeticmacularedema
AT waheednadiak visualandanatomicoutcomesofsustainedsingleagentantivegftreatmentversusdoubleantivegfswitchinginthetreatmentofpersistentdiabeticmacularedema