Cargando…

Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in COPD: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), both the time needed for patients to gain symptom improvement with long-acting bronchodilator therapy and whether an early response is predictive of a sustained response is unknown. This study aimed to investigate how quickly meaningful sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kerwin, Edward M, Boucot, Isabelle H, Vogelmeier, Claus F, Maltais, Francois, Naya, Ian P, Tombs, Lee, Jones, Paul W, Lipson, David A, Keeley, Tom, Bjermer, Leif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32462979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753466620926949
_version_ 1783543264407715840
author Kerwin, Edward M
Boucot, Isabelle H
Vogelmeier, Claus F
Maltais, Francois
Naya, Ian P
Tombs, Lee
Jones, Paul W
Lipson, David A
Keeley, Tom
Bjermer, Leif
author_facet Kerwin, Edward M
Boucot, Isabelle H
Vogelmeier, Claus F
Maltais, Francois
Naya, Ian P
Tombs, Lee
Jones, Paul W
Lipson, David A
Keeley, Tom
Bjermer, Leif
author_sort Kerwin, Edward M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), both the time needed for patients to gain symptom improvement with long-acting bronchodilator therapy and whether an early response is predictive of a sustained response is unknown. This study aimed to investigate how quickly meaningful symptom responses are seen in patients with COPD with bronchodilator therapy and whether these responses are sustained. METHODS: Early MAXimisation of bronchodilation for improving COPD stability (EMAX) was a 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial that randomised patients to umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI), umeclidinium or salmeterol. Daily Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS:COPD) score and rescue salbutamol use were captured via an electronic diary and analysed initially in 4-weekly periods. Post hoc analyses assessed change from baseline in daily E-RS:COPD score and rescue medication use weekly (Weeks 1–8), and association between E-RS:COPD responder status at Weeks 1–4 and later time points. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat population (n = 2425), reductions from baseline in E-RS:COPD scores and rescue medication use were apparent from Day 2 with all treatments. Treatment differences for UMEC/VI versus either monotherapy plateaued by Week 4–8 and were sustained at Weeks 21–24; improvements were consistently greater with UMEC/VI. For all treatments, most patients (60–85%) retained their Weeks 1–4 E-RS:COPD responder/non-responder status at Weeks 21−24. Among patients receiving UMEC/VI who were E-RS:COPD responders at Weeks 1–4, 70% were responders at Weeks 21–24. CONCLUSION: Patients with symptomatic COPD had greater potential for early symptom improvements with UMEC/VI versus either monotherapy. This benefit was generally maintained for 24 weeks. Early monitoring of treatment response can provide clinicians with an early indication of a patient’s likely longer-term response to prescribed bronchodilator treatment and will facilitate appropriate early adjustments in care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03034915, 2016-002513-22 (EudraCT Number). The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7278094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72780942020-06-17 Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in COPD: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial Kerwin, Edward M Boucot, Isabelle H Vogelmeier, Claus F Maltais, Francois Naya, Ian P Tombs, Lee Jones, Paul W Lipson, David A Keeley, Tom Bjermer, Leif Ther Adv Respir Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), both the time needed for patients to gain symptom improvement with long-acting bronchodilator therapy and whether an early response is predictive of a sustained response is unknown. This study aimed to investigate how quickly meaningful symptom responses are seen in patients with COPD with bronchodilator therapy and whether these responses are sustained. METHODS: Early MAXimisation of bronchodilation for improving COPD stability (EMAX) was a 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial that randomised patients to umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI), umeclidinium or salmeterol. Daily Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS:COPD) score and rescue salbutamol use were captured via an electronic diary and analysed initially in 4-weekly periods. Post hoc analyses assessed change from baseline in daily E-RS:COPD score and rescue medication use weekly (Weeks 1–8), and association between E-RS:COPD responder status at Weeks 1–4 and later time points. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat population (n = 2425), reductions from baseline in E-RS:COPD scores and rescue medication use were apparent from Day 2 with all treatments. Treatment differences for UMEC/VI versus either monotherapy plateaued by Week 4–8 and were sustained at Weeks 21–24; improvements were consistently greater with UMEC/VI. For all treatments, most patients (60–85%) retained their Weeks 1–4 E-RS:COPD responder/non-responder status at Weeks 21−24. Among patients receiving UMEC/VI who were E-RS:COPD responders at Weeks 1–4, 70% were responders at Weeks 21–24. CONCLUSION: Patients with symptomatic COPD had greater potential for early symptom improvements with UMEC/VI versus either monotherapy. This benefit was generally maintained for 24 weeks. Early monitoring of treatment response can provide clinicians with an early indication of a patient’s likely longer-term response to prescribed bronchodilator treatment and will facilitate appropriate early adjustments in care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03034915, 2016-002513-22 (EudraCT Number). The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section. SAGE Publications 2020-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7278094/ /pubmed/32462979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753466620926949 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Kerwin, Edward M
Boucot, Isabelle H
Vogelmeier, Claus F
Maltais, Francois
Naya, Ian P
Tombs, Lee
Jones, Paul W
Lipson, David A
Keeley, Tom
Bjermer, Leif
Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in COPD: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial
title Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in COPD: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial
title_full Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in COPD: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in COPD: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in COPD: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial
title_short Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in COPD: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial
title_sort early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in copd: a post hoc analysis of the emax randomised controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32462979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753466620926949
work_keys_str_mv AT kerwinedwardm earlyandsustainedsymptomimprovementwithumeclidiniumvilanterolversusmonotherapyincopdaposthocanalysisoftheemaxrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT boucotisabelleh earlyandsustainedsymptomimprovementwithumeclidiniumvilanterolversusmonotherapyincopdaposthocanalysisoftheemaxrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vogelmeierclausf earlyandsustainedsymptomimprovementwithumeclidiniumvilanterolversusmonotherapyincopdaposthocanalysisoftheemaxrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maltaisfrancois earlyandsustainedsymptomimprovementwithumeclidiniumvilanterolversusmonotherapyincopdaposthocanalysisoftheemaxrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nayaianp earlyandsustainedsymptomimprovementwithumeclidiniumvilanterolversusmonotherapyincopdaposthocanalysisoftheemaxrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tombslee earlyandsustainedsymptomimprovementwithumeclidiniumvilanterolversusmonotherapyincopdaposthocanalysisoftheemaxrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jonespaulw earlyandsustainedsymptomimprovementwithumeclidiniumvilanterolversusmonotherapyincopdaposthocanalysisoftheemaxrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lipsondavida earlyandsustainedsymptomimprovementwithumeclidiniumvilanterolversusmonotherapyincopdaposthocanalysisoftheemaxrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT keeleytom earlyandsustainedsymptomimprovementwithumeclidiniumvilanterolversusmonotherapyincopdaposthocanalysisoftheemaxrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bjermerleif earlyandsustainedsymptomimprovementwithumeclidiniumvilanterolversusmonotherapyincopdaposthocanalysisoftheemaxrandomisedcontrolledtrial