Cargando…

Elbow hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Intraarticular distal humeral fractures of AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 pose a surgical challenge despite the evolution of surgical implants and techniques. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is often preferred as the first choice of treatment, but the results vary and are sometimes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Hamdani, Ali, Rasmussen, Jeppe V., Holtz, Kenneth, Olsen, Bo S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32513252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04418-8
_version_ 1783543276473679872
author Al-Hamdani, Ali
Rasmussen, Jeppe V.
Holtz, Kenneth
Olsen, Bo S.
author_facet Al-Hamdani, Ali
Rasmussen, Jeppe V.
Holtz, Kenneth
Olsen, Bo S.
author_sort Al-Hamdani, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraarticular distal humeral fractures of AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 pose a surgical challenge despite the evolution of surgical implants and techniques. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is often preferred as the first choice of treatment, but the results vary and are sometimes disappointing. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has been widely used for fractures that are not amenable to ORIF in elderly patients, but the mechanical complications remain a challenge, especially in active patients. Elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA) provides a modern alternative that might avoid the mechanical complications and weight bearing restrictions related to the linked articulation in semi-constrained TEA. No studies have compared the results of EHA to that of ORIF, but case series have reported promising results. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a study protocol describing an investigator-initiated, non-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing the outcome of EHA with ORIF for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of the distal humerus in patients who are 50 years or older. Forty-four patients with AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus will be randomized to either EHA or ORIF. The Oxford Elbow Score (OES) will be used as primary outcome. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), pain severity score (VAS), range of motion, and patient satisfaction will be used as secondary outcomes. Reoperations, complications, and the length of sick leave will be recorded. The patients will be examined after the operation and at 3 months and 1, 2, 5, and 10 years. DISCUSSION: The main objective of this study is to investigate the best treatment option for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above. We hypothesize that EHA results in fewer complications and superior functional outcome compared with ORIF and that the mechanical complications related to the linked articulation of TEA can be avoided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, PRS, NCT04163172. Registered November 13, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=evori&cntry=&state=&city=&dist= (Table 2). The protocol has been approved by The Scientific Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (Jr. no.: H(− 19,035,590)). The processing of personal data has been approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (Jr. no. P-2019-246). Inclusion started on February 1, 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7278155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72781552020-06-09 Elbow hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above: a randomized controlled trial Al-Hamdani, Ali Rasmussen, Jeppe V. Holtz, Kenneth Olsen, Bo S. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Intraarticular distal humeral fractures of AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 pose a surgical challenge despite the evolution of surgical implants and techniques. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is often preferred as the first choice of treatment, but the results vary and are sometimes disappointing. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has been widely used for fractures that are not amenable to ORIF in elderly patients, but the mechanical complications remain a challenge, especially in active patients. Elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA) provides a modern alternative that might avoid the mechanical complications and weight bearing restrictions related to the linked articulation in semi-constrained TEA. No studies have compared the results of EHA to that of ORIF, but case series have reported promising results. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a study protocol describing an investigator-initiated, non-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing the outcome of EHA with ORIF for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of the distal humerus in patients who are 50 years or older. Forty-four patients with AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus will be randomized to either EHA or ORIF. The Oxford Elbow Score (OES) will be used as primary outcome. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), pain severity score (VAS), range of motion, and patient satisfaction will be used as secondary outcomes. Reoperations, complications, and the length of sick leave will be recorded. The patients will be examined after the operation and at 3 months and 1, 2, 5, and 10 years. DISCUSSION: The main objective of this study is to investigate the best treatment option for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above. We hypothesize that EHA results in fewer complications and superior functional outcome compared with ORIF and that the mechanical complications related to the linked articulation of TEA can be avoided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, PRS, NCT04163172. Registered November 13, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=evori&cntry=&state=&city=&dist= (Table 2). The protocol has been approved by The Scientific Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (Jr. no.: H(− 19,035,590)). The processing of personal data has been approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (Jr. no. P-2019-246). Inclusion started on February 1, 2020. BioMed Central 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7278155/ /pubmed/32513252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04418-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Al-Hamdani, Ali
Rasmussen, Jeppe V.
Holtz, Kenneth
Olsen, Bo S.
Elbow hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above: a randomized controlled trial
title Elbow hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Elbow hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Elbow hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Elbow hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Elbow hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort elbow hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation for ao/ota type 13 c2 and c3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above: a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32513252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04418-8
work_keys_str_mv AT alhamdaniali elbowhemiarthroplastyversusopenreductionandinternalfixationforaootatype13c2andc3fracturesofdistalhumerusinpatientsaged50yearsorabovearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rasmussenjeppev elbowhemiarthroplastyversusopenreductionandinternalfixationforaootatype13c2andc3fracturesofdistalhumerusinpatientsaged50yearsorabovearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT holtzkenneth elbowhemiarthroplastyversusopenreductionandinternalfixationforaootatype13c2andc3fracturesofdistalhumerusinpatientsaged50yearsorabovearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT olsenbos elbowhemiarthroplastyversusopenreductionandinternalfixationforaootatype13c2andc3fracturesofdistalhumerusinpatientsaged50yearsorabovearandomizedcontrolledtrial