Cargando…

Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies in neurocritical patients: a culprit or a bystander?

BACKGROUND: Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) is an intracellular enzyme, which is widely expressed in central nervous system (CNS), pancreas, and other organs. GAD antibodies (GAD-Abs) are linked to various neurological disorders. However, the significance of GAD-Abs in neurocritical patients is un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Dongmei, Huang, Kaibin, Lin, Zhenzhou, Zhang, Yongfang, Liu, Guanghui, Wu, Yongming, Wang, Shengnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32514855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04466-7
_version_ 1783543290837073920
author Wang, Dongmei
Huang, Kaibin
Lin, Zhenzhou
Zhang, Yongfang
Liu, Guanghui
Wu, Yongming
Wang, Shengnan
author_facet Wang, Dongmei
Huang, Kaibin
Lin, Zhenzhou
Zhang, Yongfang
Liu, Guanghui
Wu, Yongming
Wang, Shengnan
author_sort Wang, Dongmei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) is an intracellular enzyme, which is widely expressed in central nervous system (CNS), pancreas, and other organs. GAD antibodies (GAD-Abs) are linked to various neurological disorders. However, the significance of GAD-Abs in neurocritical patients is undetermined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with serologically positive GAD-Abs and requiring neurocritical care were included. The clinical, laboratory, and outcome data were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: We included 9 patients with serologically positive GAD-Abs. Clinical manifestations involved both CNS and peripheral nervous system (PNS). Six (66.7%) patients had other specific autoimmune antibodies. Non-specific autoimmune responses were observed in 8 (88.9%) patients. All patients clinically responded well to immunotherapy. The titers of GAD-Abs decreased in 7 (77.8%) patients but remained unchanged in the other 2 patients. One (11.1%) patient awoke before the negative conversion of GAD-Abs, and 3 (33.3%) patients remained unconscious and/or under mechanical ventilation for several weeks after the vanishing of GAD-Abs. CONCLUSIONS: Most neurocritical patients with serologically positive GAD-Abs had other specific autoimmune antibodies. All patients responded well to immunotherapy, but not parallel to the titers of GAD-Abs. These results indicated that GAD-Abs might be more a bystander than a culprit in neurocritical patients, suggesting that an underlying autoimmune disease should be explored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7278224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72782242020-06-09 Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies in neurocritical patients: a culprit or a bystander? Wang, Dongmei Huang, Kaibin Lin, Zhenzhou Zhang, Yongfang Liu, Guanghui Wu, Yongming Wang, Shengnan Neurol Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) is an intracellular enzyme, which is widely expressed in central nervous system (CNS), pancreas, and other organs. GAD antibodies (GAD-Abs) are linked to various neurological disorders. However, the significance of GAD-Abs in neurocritical patients is undetermined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with serologically positive GAD-Abs and requiring neurocritical care were included. The clinical, laboratory, and outcome data were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: We included 9 patients with serologically positive GAD-Abs. Clinical manifestations involved both CNS and peripheral nervous system (PNS). Six (66.7%) patients had other specific autoimmune antibodies. Non-specific autoimmune responses were observed in 8 (88.9%) patients. All patients clinically responded well to immunotherapy. The titers of GAD-Abs decreased in 7 (77.8%) patients but remained unchanged in the other 2 patients. One (11.1%) patient awoke before the negative conversion of GAD-Abs, and 3 (33.3%) patients remained unconscious and/or under mechanical ventilation for several weeks after the vanishing of GAD-Abs. CONCLUSIONS: Most neurocritical patients with serologically positive GAD-Abs had other specific autoimmune antibodies. All patients responded well to immunotherapy, but not parallel to the titers of GAD-Abs. These results indicated that GAD-Abs might be more a bystander than a culprit in neurocritical patients, suggesting that an underlying autoimmune disease should be explored. Springer International Publishing 2020-06-08 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7278224/ /pubmed/32514855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04466-7 Text en © Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wang, Dongmei
Huang, Kaibin
Lin, Zhenzhou
Zhang, Yongfang
Liu, Guanghui
Wu, Yongming
Wang, Shengnan
Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies in neurocritical patients: a culprit or a bystander?
title Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies in neurocritical patients: a culprit or a bystander?
title_full Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies in neurocritical patients: a culprit or a bystander?
title_fullStr Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies in neurocritical patients: a culprit or a bystander?
title_full_unstemmed Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies in neurocritical patients: a culprit or a bystander?
title_short Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies in neurocritical patients: a culprit or a bystander?
title_sort glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies in neurocritical patients: a culprit or a bystander?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32514855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04466-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wangdongmei glutamicaciddecarboxylaseantibodiesinneurocriticalpatientsaculpritorabystander
AT huangkaibin glutamicaciddecarboxylaseantibodiesinneurocriticalpatientsaculpritorabystander
AT linzhenzhou glutamicaciddecarboxylaseantibodiesinneurocriticalpatientsaculpritorabystander
AT zhangyongfang glutamicaciddecarboxylaseantibodiesinneurocriticalpatientsaculpritorabystander
AT liuguanghui glutamicaciddecarboxylaseantibodiesinneurocriticalpatientsaculpritorabystander
AT wuyongming glutamicaciddecarboxylaseantibodiesinneurocriticalpatientsaculpritorabystander
AT wangshengnan glutamicaciddecarboxylaseantibodiesinneurocriticalpatientsaculpritorabystander