Cargando…
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer remains the most common and second most deadly cancer diagnosed amongst U.S. men. External beam radiotherapy is a standard-of-care definitive treatment option for localized prostate cancer and historically constituted an 8–9-week treatment course comprised of 39–45 doses of 1.8–2.0 G...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557988320927241 |
_version_ | 1783543311550644224 |
---|---|
author | Parikh, Neil R. Kishan, Amar U. |
author_facet | Parikh, Neil R. Kishan, Amar U. |
author_sort | Parikh, Neil R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prostate cancer remains the most common and second most deadly cancer diagnosed amongst U.S. men. External beam radiotherapy is a standard-of-care definitive treatment option for localized prostate cancer and historically constituted an 8–9-week treatment course comprised of 39–45 doses of 1.8–2.0 Gy each (conventional fractionation, CF). Based on the notion that prostate cancer may respond favorably to a higher dose per day, considerable research efforts have been focused on characterizing the safety and efficacy profile of shorter and shorter radiation courses. Ultrahypofractionation (UHF) involves condensing the radiation course into just 5–7 treatments of 6–8 Gy each. When utilizing modern techniques that allow the precise sculpting of a dose distribution that delivers high doses to the prostate and lower doses to surrounding normal tissues over five or fewer treatments, this treatment is called stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Two randomized trials (HYPO-RT-PC and PACE-B) have compared UHF to longer radiation courses. The former demonstrated that UHF and CF have similar long-term toxicity and efficacy, while the latter demonstrated that modern SBRT has equivalent short-term toxicity as well. A separate report from a consortium of studies data provides prospective, albeit nonrandomized, data supporting the longer-term safety and efficacy of SBRT specifically. Thus, mounting high-level evidence suggests that SBRT is an acceptable standard care of option for men with localized prostate cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7278320 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72783202020-06-17 Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Parikh, Neil R. Kishan, Amar U. Am J Mens Health Urological Cancer - Review Prostate cancer remains the most common and second most deadly cancer diagnosed amongst U.S. men. External beam radiotherapy is a standard-of-care definitive treatment option for localized prostate cancer and historically constituted an 8–9-week treatment course comprised of 39–45 doses of 1.8–2.0 Gy each (conventional fractionation, CF). Based on the notion that prostate cancer may respond favorably to a higher dose per day, considerable research efforts have been focused on characterizing the safety and efficacy profile of shorter and shorter radiation courses. Ultrahypofractionation (UHF) involves condensing the radiation course into just 5–7 treatments of 6–8 Gy each. When utilizing modern techniques that allow the precise sculpting of a dose distribution that delivers high doses to the prostate and lower doses to surrounding normal tissues over five or fewer treatments, this treatment is called stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Two randomized trials (HYPO-RT-PC and PACE-B) have compared UHF to longer radiation courses. The former demonstrated that UHF and CF have similar long-term toxicity and efficacy, while the latter demonstrated that modern SBRT has equivalent short-term toxicity as well. A separate report from a consortium of studies data provides prospective, albeit nonrandomized, data supporting the longer-term safety and efficacy of SBRT specifically. Thus, mounting high-level evidence suggests that SBRT is an acceptable standard care of option for men with localized prostate cancer. SAGE Publications 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7278320/ /pubmed/32500805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557988320927241 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Urological Cancer - Review Parikh, Neil R. Kishan, Amar U. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer |
title | Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer |
title_full | Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer |
title_fullStr | Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer |
title_short | Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer |
title_sort | stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer |
topic | Urological Cancer - Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557988320927241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parikhneilr stereotacticbodyradiotherapyforprostatecancer AT kishanamaru stereotacticbodyradiotherapyforprostatecancer |